Diagnostic accuracy with US: Remote radiologists' versus on-site radiologists' interpretations

Radiology

Volumn 210, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 733-736

  Rosen, Max P ^a   Levine, Deborah ^a   Carpenter, Janet M ^a   Frost, Lisa ^a   Hulka, Carol A ^a   Western, Donna L ^a   McArdle, Colin R ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Pelvic organs; Pelvic organs, diseases; Pregnancy, US; Radiology and radiologists, departmental management; Teleradiology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PELVIC DISEASE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; TELECOMMUNICATION; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0033009799     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr35733     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Emerson DS, Felker RE. Remote real-time ultrasound interactive telediagnosis: putting it into practice. J Ambulatory Care Manage 1995; 18:20-34.
2. Nores J, Malone FD, Athanassiou A, Craigo SD, Simpson L, D'Alton ME. Validation of first-trimester telemedicine as an obstetric imaging technology: a feasibility study. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:353-356.
3. Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Keefe B, Mittelstaedt C, Pisano ED, Lee JKT. Real-time radiologist review of remote ultrasound using low-cost video and voice. Invest Radiol 1993; 28:723-734.
4. Fisk NM, Sepulveda W, Drysdale K, et al. Fetal telemedicine: six month pilot of real-time ultrasound and video consultation between the Isle of Wight and London. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103:1092-1095.
5. Landwehr JB, Zador IE, Wolfe HM, Dombrowski MP, Treadwell MC. Telemedicine and fetal ultrasonography: assessment of technical performance and clinical feasibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:846-848.