Variability in some texture characteristics and chemical composition of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 86, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2445-2449

  Casañas, Francesc ^a,c   Pujolà, Montserrat ^a   Del Castillo, Roser Romero ^a   Almirall, Antoni ^a   Sánchez, Esther ^a   Nuez, Fernando ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chemical composition; Common bean; Texture; Variability

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 33750625081     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2638     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Wassimi NN, Hostfield GL and Uerbersax MA, Inheritance of physico-chemical seed characters related to culinary quality in dry bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:492-499 (1990).
2. Sanz-Calvo M and del Rey JA, Sensory analysis of beans. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 3:201-204 (1999).
3. Pujolà M, Casañas F, Bosch L, Almirall A, Sánchez E and Nuez F, Creaminess and chemical composition in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): the roles of protein and starch, in 5th European Conference on Grain Legumes. Conference Handbook. Dijon, ed. by AEP (European Association for Grain Legume Research). 12 Avenue George V, 75008 Paris, France. p. 424 (2004).
4. Santalla M, Rodiño AP and de Ron AM, Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for the common bean. Theor Appl Genet 104:934-944 (2002).
5. Casañas F, Bosch L, Pujolà M, Sanchez E, Sorribas X, Baldi M, et al, Characteristics of a common bean landrace (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of great culinary value and selection of a commercial inbred line. J Sci Food Agric 79:693-698 (1999).
6. Quenzer NM, Fuman VL and Burns EE, Some factors affecting pinto bean quality. J Food Sci 43:1059-1061 (1978).
7. Wang CR, Chang KC and Grafton K, Canning quality evaluation of pinto and navy beans. J Food Sci 53:772-776 (1998).
8. Casañas F, Pujolà M, Bosch L, Sanchez E and Nuez F, Chemical basis for low sensory perception of Ganxet bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed coat. J Sci Food Agric 82:1282-1286 (2002).
9. Ong MH and Blanxhard JMV, Texture determinants in cooked parboiled rice. I: Rice starch amylase and the fine structure of amylopectin. J Cereal Sci 21:251-260 (1995).
10. Ramesh M, Bhattacharya KR and Mitchell JR, Developments in understanding the basis of cooked-rice texture. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 40:449-460 (2000).
11. Champagne ET, Bett-Garber KL, McClung AM and Bergman C, Sensory characteristics of diverse rice cultivars as influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Cereal Chem 81:237-243 (2004).
12. Park JK, Kim SS and Kim KO, Effect of milling ratio on sensory properties of cooked rice and on physicochemical properties of milled and cooked rice. Cereal Chem 78:151-156 (2004).
13. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA (1990).
14. Southgate DA, Determination of carbohydrates in foods. I. Available carbohydrates. J Sci Food Agric 20:326-330 (1969).
15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of analysis, 20th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA (1997).
16. Juliano BO, Perez CM, Blakeney AB, Castillo T, Kongseree N, Laignelet B, et al, International cooperative testing on the amylase content of milled rice. Starch/Stärke 33:157-162 (1981).
17. SAS Institute, SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary NC (1985).
18. Baudoin JP and Maquet A, Improvement of protein and amino acid contents in seeds of food legumes. A case study in Phaseolus. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 3:220-224 (1999).