Indicators and procedures: Nevertheless and but

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 463-486

  Blakemore, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444291305     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700008355     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
2. Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bach, K. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22.4. 327-366.
4. Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge.
5. Bar-Lev, Z. & Palacas, A. (1980). Semantic command over pragmatic priority. Lingua 51. 137-146.
6. Blakemore, D. L. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Blakemore, D. L. (1989). Denial and contrast: a Relevance theoretic analysis of 'but'. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 15-37.
8. Blakemore, D. L. (1990). Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91. 197-213.
9. Blakemore, D. L. (1993). The relevance of reformulations. Language and Literature 2.2. 101-120.
10. Blakemore, D. L. (1996). Are apposition markers discourse markers? Journal of Linguistics 32. 325-347.
11. Blakemore, D. L. (1998). Non-truth conditional meaning. Linguistische Berichte 8. 92-101.
12. Blakemore, D. & Carston, R. (1999). The interpretation of and-conjunctions. In Iten, C. & Neelman, A. (eds.), University College Working Papers in Linguistics II. London: UCL. 1-20.
13. Blass, R. (1990). Relevance relations in discourse: a study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Blass, R. (1993). Are there logical relations in a text? Lingua 90.1/2. 91-110.
15. Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature and truth theoretic semantics. In Kempson, R. (ed.), Mental representations: the interface between language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155-182.
16. Carston, R. (1993). Conjunction, explanation and relevance. Lingua 90.1/2. 27-48.
17. Carston, R. (1999) The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from Relevance Theory. In Turner, K. (ed.), The semantics-pragmatics interface from different points of view. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 85-125.
18. Carston, R. (forthcoming). Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Clark, B. (1991). Relevance Theory and the semantics of non-declaratives. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.
20. Clark, B. (1993). Relevance and pseudo-imperatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 79-121.
21. Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
22. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Hobbs, J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3. 67-90.
24. Haegeman, L. (1993). The interpretation of the particle da in West Flemish. Lingua 90.1/2. 291-319.
25. Higashimori, I. (1994). A Relevance theoretic analysis of even, sae/sura/mo/temo/ddemo/ datte/made. English Literature Review (Kyoto Women's University) 38. 51-80.
26. Ifantidou-Trouki, E. (1993). Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90.1/2. 65-90.
27. Itani, R. (1993). The Japanese sentence-final particle 'ka': a relevance theoretic approach. Lingua 90.1/2. 129-147.
28. Kitis, E. (1995). Connectives and ideology. Paper delivered at the 4th International Symposium on Critical Discourse Analysis: Language, Social Life and Critical Thought. University of Athens, 15-16 December 1995.
29. Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. (1987). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9. 57-90.
30. Palmer, F. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Recanati, F. (1987). Meaning and force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Rieber, S. (1997). Conventional implicatures as tacit performatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 20.1. 51-72.
33. Rouchota, V. (1994a). The semantics and pragmatics of the subjunctive in Modern Greek - a Relevance theoretic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.
34. Rouchota, V. (1994b). Na-interrogatives in Modern Greek: their interpretation and relevance. In Philippaki-Warburton, I. et al. (eds.), Themes in Greek linguistics: papers from the First International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 177-184.
35. Rouchota, V. (1994c). The subjunctive in Modern Greek: dividing the labour between semantics and pragmatics. Journal of Modern Greek Studies 30. 441-475.
36. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1988). Mood and modality, in Dancy, J. Moravcsik, J. & Taylor, C. (eds.), Human agency: language, duty and value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 77-101.
39. Wilson D. & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90. 5-25.
40. Urmson, J. (1966). Parenthetical verbs. In Flew, A. (ed.), Essays in conceptual analysis. London: MacMillan. 192-212.