Scope and limitations of diagnostics in breast disease - Focussing on large core biopsy;Möglichkeiten und grenzen der mammadiagnostik unter besonderer berücksichtigung der perkutanen stanzbiosie

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 456-461

  De Waal, Johann Christian ^a   Prechtel, K ^a   Weltz, J ^a   Staufer, F ^a   Pankratz Hauer, M ^a   Nerlich, A ^b  

^a Gemeinschaftspraxis im Brustzentrum Dachau ^*  (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BOGENHAUSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast diagnosis; Breast ultrasound; Clinical finding; Evaluation; Histological B classification; Large core biopsy; Mammography; Total diagnostic score

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33750610004     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926818     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. American College of Radiology (ACR). Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston (VA), 1998; 3rd edition
2. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003; 4th edition
3. Ariga R, Bloom K, Ready VB et al. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 410-413
4. Bazzocchi M, Facecchia I, Zuiani C et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast. Its diagnostic imaging and the role of percutaneous needle biopsy with a 14-gauge needle. Radiol Med (Torino) 1999; 98: 133-137
5. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849
6. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E et al. Ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer 1999; 87: 19-24
7. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 341-346
8. Britton P, Morgan MWE. Core and Diagnostic Biopsies. In: della Rovere GQ, Warren R, Benson JR (Hrsg). Early Breast Cancer. From Screening to Multidisciplinary Management 2006: 210-216
9. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P et al. Ultraschallgezielte Stanzbiopsie der Mamma: Technik, Ergebnisse, Indikationen. Der Radiologe 2002; 42:25-32
10. Carder PJ, Liston JC. Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate? J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 133-138
11. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S et al. Accuracy of Sonographically guided 14-Gauge Core-Needle Biopsy: Results of 715 consecutive Breast Biopsies with at least two-Year Follow-UP of benign Lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33: 47-52
12. Dahlstrom JE, Jain S, Sutton T et at. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographic breast cancer screening programme. Histopathology 1996; 28: 421-427
13. De Waal JC, Sültz D. Bildgebende Verfahren in der Mammadiagnostik. Chir Praxis 2002; 60: 145-158
14. De Wolf C. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1996; 2nd edition
15. Duda V, Schulz-Wendtland R. Mammadiagnostik, komplementärer Einsatz aller Verfahren. Springer-Verlag, 2004
16. Fersis N, Smyczek-Gargya B. Krainick U et al. Klinische Erfahrungen mit perkutanen Biopsien der Brust und deren histologische Beurteilung. Zentralbl Gynakol 2001; 123: 132-135
17. Fishman JE, Milikowski C, Ramsinghani R et al. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary? Radiology 2003; 226: 779-782
18. Götzinger P, Gebhard b, Gnant M et al. Die Wertigkeit der Stanzbiopsie in der Diagnostik palpabler Brusttumoren Eine prospektive Analyse von 150 Patienten. Der Chirurg 1998; 69: 1068-1071
19. Hille H, Vetter M, Hackelöer BJ. Neubewertung der Mammasonographie in der gegenwärtigen Mammakarzinomdiagnostik. Ultraschall in Med 2004; 25: 411-417
20. Ioffe OB, Berg WA, Silverberg SG et al. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast. Mod Pathol 1998; 11: 721-727
21. Krainick-Strobel U, Hahn M, Duda VF et al. Konsensusempfehlung zu Anwendung und Indikationen der Vakuumbiopsie der Brust unter Ultraschallsicht. Geburtsh Frauenheilkunde 2005; 65: 526-529
22. Lee AH, Denley HE, Pinder SE et al. Excision biopsy findings of patients with breast needle core biopsies reported as suspicious of malignancy (B4) or lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Histopathology 2003;42:331-636
23. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 2000; 89: 2538-2546
24. Lorenzen J, Welger J, Lisboa BW et al. Perkutane Hochgeschwindigkeitsstanzbiopsie palpabler Brusttumoren: 1st die Sonographie notwendig? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1142-1146
25. McKenzie JG, Daltymple J. Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology. In: della Rovere GQ, Warren R, Benson JR (Hrsg). Early Breast Cancer, From Screening to Multidisciplinary Management 2006: 200-209
26. Memarsadeghi M, Pfarl G, Riedl C et al. Die Wertigkeit der 14-Gauge Ultraschall-gezielten Stanzbiopsie bei Brustläsionen. Röfo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003; 175: 374-380
27. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998; 206: 717-720
28. Moore MM, Hargett 3rd CW, Hanks JB et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 726-731 (discussion 731-733)
29. National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology (NHSBSP). Pathology Reporting in Breast Screening. Sheffield (UK): Breast Screening Publications, 2001; No 50
30. Orel S, Kay N, Reynolds C et al. Birads categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845-850
31. Parker SH, Burbank FR. A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996; 200: 11-20
32. Pfarl G, Helbich TH. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) - Deutsche Version. Röfo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002; 174: 921-926
33. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Methods for Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast. AJR 2003; 180: 347-351
34. Pilgrimm S, Ravichandran D. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology as an adjunct to Core Biopsy in the Assessment of Symptomatic Breast Carcinoma. Breast 2005; 14: 411-414
35. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 967-972
36. Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Krämer S et al. Sonographisch gezielte Stanzbiopsie: Wie viele Biopsiezylinder sind notwendig? Röfo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003; 175: 94-98
37. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Imhoff K et al. Diagnostik von Brustdrüsenerkrankungen. Biopsiemethoden im Vergleich. GynäkolPrax 2004; 28: 607-625
38. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Imhoff K et al. Interventionelle Methoden in der Mammadiagnostik - Ein neues Mamma-Vakuumbiopsie-system im täglichen klinischen Einsatz. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 411-414
39. Schulz-Wendtland R, Krämer S, Döinghaus K et al. Interventionelle Techniken in der Mammadiagnostik: sonographisch gezielte Stanzbiopsie. Akt Radiol 1997; 7: 30-34
40. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D et al. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologie, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2004; 97: 1824-1831
41. Sittek H, de Waal JC, Eiermann W et al In: Sauer HJ, Tumorzentrum München (Hrsg). Manual Mammakarzinome. München/Wien/New York: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 2003; 9: 28-40
42. Sittek H, Kessler M, Untch M et al. Minimal-invasive Biopsie und prä operative Markierung suspekter Mammaläsionen. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2004; 44:69-83
43. Sittek H, Wieser A, Kessler M et al. Sonographically guided, minimal invasive Biopsy of uncertain Mammary Lesions. Clinical Experience with a new Biopsy System. Radiologe 2005; 45: 269-277
44. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 43-49
45. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound. Lippincott: Williams & Williams, 2004
46. Tabor L, Tot T, Dean P. Breast Cancer, The Art and Science of Early Detection with Mammography. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag, 2005
47. Untch M, Sittek H, Bauerfeind I et al. Diagnostik und Therapie des Mammakarzinoms - State of the Art 2004. München/Wien/New York: W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 2004
48. White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson Jr JA et al. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 769-777