Evaluation of a diabetes education call center intervention

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 457-465

  Boren, Suzanne Austin ^a   De Leo, Gianluca ^b   Chanetsa, F Fungai ^a   Donaldson, Joe ^c   Krishna, Santosh ^b   Balas, E Andrew ^d  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; GLUCOSE; HEALTH CARE; INSULIN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NUTRITION;

DIABETES; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; VOICE TECHNOLOGIES;

DISEASES;

INSULIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COPING BEHAVIOR; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION CENTER; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRETEST POSTTEST CONTROL GROUP DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; SELF EVALUATION; SELF HELP; TELECONSULTATION; TELEPHONE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BODY WEIGHT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; BODY WEIGHT; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 33750604820     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.457     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Diabetes Association. Basic Diabetes Information. www.diabetes.org/ Last accessed May 27, 2005.
2. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care 2003;26:917-932.
3. Nicolucci A, Cavaliere D, Scorpiglione N, Carinci F, Capani F, Tognoni G, Benedetti MM. A comprehensive assessment of the avoidability of long-term complications of diabetes. A case-control study. SID-AMD Italian Study Group for the Implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration. Diabetes Care 1996;19:927-933.
4. Pasagian-Macaulay A, Basch CE, Zybert P, Wylie-Rosett J. Ophthalmic knowledge and beliefs among women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 1997;23:433-437.
5. Mullen PD, Simons-Morton DG, Ramirez G, Frankowski RF, Green LW, Mains DA. A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns 1997;32:157-173.
6. Padgett D, Mumford E, Haynes M, Carter R. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychological intervention on management of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:1007-1030.
7. Balas EA, Krishna S, Kretschmer RA, Cheek TR, Lobach DF, Boren SA. Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care. Med Care 2004;42:610-621.
8. Piette JD. Using telephone support to manage chronic disease. California HealthCare Foundation. June 2005. www.chcf.org Last accessed June 7, 2005.
9. Piette JD, McPhee SJ, Weinberger M, Mah CA, Kraemer FB. Use of automated telephone disease management calls in an ethnically diverse sample of low-income patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1302-1309.
10. Piette JD. Patient education via automated calls: A study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. Am J Prev Med 1999;17:138-141.
11. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med 2000;108:20-27.
12. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: A randomized, controlled trial. Med Care 2000;38:218-230.
13. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Diabetes Care 2001;24:202-208.
14. Krishna S, Balas EA, Boren SA, Maglaveras N. Patient acceptance of educational voice messages: A review of controlled clinical studies. Methods Inf Med 2002;41:360-369.
15. Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M, Weinger K, Mulcahy K, Barta P, Hosey G, Kopher W, Lasichak A, Lamb B, Mangan M, Norman J, Tanja J, Yauk L, Wisdom K, Adams C. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Care 2003;26:S149-156.
16. De Leo G, Krishna, S, Boren SA, Fato M, Porro I, Balas EA. Web and computer telephone-based diabetes education: Lessons learnt from the development and use of a call center. J Med Syst 2005;29:343-355.
17. The Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center. Survey Instruments. www.med.umich.edu/mdrtc/Last accessed June 3, 2003.
18. Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, Barr PA, Anderson RM, Hiss RG, Davis WK. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care 1998;21:706-710.
19. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, Arnold MS, Fitzgerald JT, Feste CC. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 1995;18:943-949.
20. Coster S, Gulliford MC, Seed PT. Self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Med 2000;17:755-761.
21. Harris MI. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:979-982.
22. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: The Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry. Am J Med 2001;111:1-9.