Comparison of expected vs. actual tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Knee

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-18

  Sudhahar, T A ^a,b   Glasgow, M M S ^a   Donell, S T ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS GRAMPIAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament; Ligament reconstruction; Tunnel position

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTHROTOMY; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; LIGAMENT SURGERY; PATELLA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENDON; TIBIA; X RAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 1242270563     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00100-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Howell S.M., Clark J.A., Farley T.E. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Part A. 75:1993;1044-1055.
2. Aglietti P., Buzzi R., Giron F., Simeone A.J.V., Zaccherotti G. Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc. 5:1997;138-144.
3. Romano V.M., Graf B.K., Keene J.S., et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion. Am J Sports Med. 21:1993;415-418.
4. Klos T.V.S., Banks S.A., Habets R.J.E., Cook F.F. Sagittal plane imaging parameters for computer-assisted fluoroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comput Aided Surg. 5:2000;28-34.
5. Khalfayan E.E., Sharkey P.F., et al. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 24:1996;335-341.
6. Picard F., DiGioia A.M., Moody J., et al. Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 6:(5):2001;279-289.
7. Boden B., Migaud H., Gougeon F., Debroucker M.J., Duquennou A. Effect of graft position on laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Stress radiography in 90 knees 2 to 5 years after autograft. Acta Orthop Belg. 62:1996;2-7.
8. Djian P., Christel P., Roger B., Witvoet J. Radiologic And MRI evaluation of intra-articular ligamentoplasty using a patellar tendon. Correlations with anatomical results. Rev Chir Orthop. 80:(5):1994;403-412.
9. Klos T.V., Harman M.K., Devilee R.J., Banks S.A., Cook F.F. Patellar tendon graft position after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Interobserver variability on lateral radiographs. Acta Orthop Scand. 70:(2):1999;180-184.
10. Klos T.V., Habets R.J., Banks A.Z., Banks S.A., Devilee R.J., Cook F.F. Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop. (354):1998;65-69.
11. Burkart A., Debski R.E., McMahon P.J., et al. Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 6:(5):2001;270-278.