Impact of corn vitreousness and processing on site and extent of digestion by feedlot cattle

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 3020-3031

  Corona, L ^a,b   Owens, F N ^a,c   Zinn, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c PIONEER HI BRED INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cattle; Corn; Digestion; Processing; Vitreousness

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; ZEA MAYS;

BOS TAURUS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33750576364     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-603     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 1969. ASAE Standard S319: Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. Page 346 in Agriculture Engineers Yearbook. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.
2. AOAC. 1986. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.
3. Barajas, R., and R. A. Zinn. 1998. The feeding value of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn in finishing diets for feedlot cattle: Influence of protein supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1714-1752.
4. Bergen, W. G., D. B. Purser, and J. H. Cline. 1968. Effect of ration on the nutritive quality of microbial protein. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1497-1501.
5. Chai, W., and P. Uden. 1998. An alternative oven method combined with different detergent strengths in analysis of neutral detergent fiber. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 74:281-288.
6. Cole, N. A., R. R. Johnson, and F. N. Owens. 1976. Influence of roughage level and corn processing method on the site and extent of digestion by beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 43:490-496.
7. Correa, C. E. S., R. D. Shaver, M. N. Pereira, J. G. Lauer, and K. Kohn. 2002. Relationship between corn vitreousness and ruminal in situ starch degradability. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3008-3012.
8. Dombrink-Kurtzman, M. A., and J. A. Bietz. 1993. Zein composition in hard and soft endosperm of maize. Cereal Chem. 70:105-108.
9. Dombrink-Kurtzman, M. A., and C. A. Knutson. 1997. A study of maize endosperm hardness in relation to amylose content and susceptibility to damage. Cereal Chem. 74:776-780.
10. Dorsey-Redding, C., C. R. Hurburgh Jr., L. A. Johnson, and S. R. Fox. 1991. Relationships among maize quality factors. Cereal Chem. 68:602-605.
11. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 1992. Maize in human nutrition. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO Food and Nutrition Series, No. 25). Rome, Italy.
12. Gajda, M., E. A. Flickinger, C. M. Grieshop, L. L. Bauer, N. R. Merchen, and G. C. Fahey, Jr. 2005. Corn hybrid affects in vitro and in vivo measures of nutrient digestibility in dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:160-171.
13. Gibson, T. S., V. A. Solah, and B. V. McCleary. 1997. A procedure to measure amylose in cereal starches and flours with concanavalin A. J. Cereal Sci. 25:111-119.
14. Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.
15. Hamilton, T. S., B. C. Hamilton, B. C. Johnson, and H. H. Mitchell. 1951. The dependence of the physical and chemical composition of the corn kernel on soil fertility and cropping system. Cereal Chem. 28:163-176.
16. Hicks, C. R. 1973. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments. 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY.
17. Hill, F. N., and D. L. Anderson. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive determinations with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64:587-603.
18. Hoover, W. H. 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2755-2766.
19. Huntington, G. B. 1997. Starch utilization by ruminants: From basics to the bunk. J. Anim. Sci. 75:852-867.
20. Johnson, D. E., J. K. Matsushima, and K. L. Knox. 1968. Utilization of flaked vs. cracked corn by steers with observations on starch modification. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1431-1437.
21. Katarski, S. F., R. D. Waniska, and K. K. Thurn. 1992. Starch hydrolysis by the rumen microflora. J. Nutr. 122:178-190.
22. McAllister, T. A., K. J. Cheng, L. M. Rode, and C. W. Forsberg. 1990. Digestion of barley, maize, and wheat by selected species of ruminal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:3146-3153.
23. Mohd, B. M. N., and M. Wootton. 1984. In vitro digestibility of hydroxypropyl maize, waxy maize and high amylose maize starches. Starch/Die Stǎrke 36:273-275.
24. NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
25. Ørskov, E. R., N. A. MacLeod, and D. J. Kyle. 1986. Flow of nitrogen from the rumen and abomasum in cattle and sheep given protein-free nutrients by intragastric infusion. Br. J. Nutr. 56:241-248.
26. Owens, F. N., and R. A. Zinn. 2005. Corn grain for cattle: Influence of processing on site and extent of digestion. Pages 86-112 in Proc. 20th Annual Southwest Nutr. Conf., Phoenix, AZ. Univ. Arizona, Tucson.
27. Philippeau, C., F. Le Deschault de Monredon, and B. Michalet-Doreau. 1999a. Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain. J. Anim. Sci. 77:238-243.
28. Philippeau, C., C. Martin, and B. Michalet-Doreau. 1999b. Influence of grain source on ruminal characteristics and rate, site, and extent of digestion in beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1587-1596.
29. Pomeranz, Y., C. R. Martin, D. D. Traylor, and F. S. Lai. 1984. Corn hardness determination. Cereal Chem. 61:147-150.
30. Rodríguez, S., J. F. Calderón, and R. A. Zinn. 2001. Variation in ruminal starch digestion due to dry rolling versus steam flaking corn and sorghum can be reliably predicted based on changes in starch solubility and 6-h amylase reactive insoluble starch. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52: 529-530.
31. Rooney, L. W., and R. L. Pflugfelder. 1986. Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1607-1623.
32. Russell, J. B., and D. B. Wilson. 1996. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? J. Dairy Sci. 79:1503-1509.
33. Wang, X., P. L. Conway, I. L. Brown, and A. J. Evans. 1999. In vitro utilization of amylopectin and high-amylose maize (amylomaize) starch granules by human colonic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4848-4854.
34. Watson, S. A. 1987. Structure and Composition. Pages 53-82 in Corn: Chemistry and Technology. S. A.Watson, and E. R. Ramstad, ed. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, MN.
35. Wolin, M. J. 1960. A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. J. Dairy Sci. 43:1452-1459.
36. Zinn, R. A. 1987. Influence of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin on comparative feeding value of steam-flaked versus dry-rolled corn in diets for feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 65:256-266.
37. Zinn, R. A. 1988. Comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in finishing diets for feedlot steers supplemented with and without monensin. J. Anim. Sci. 66:213-227.
38. Zinn, R. A. 1990. Influence of flake density on the comparative feeding value of steam-flaked corn for feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:767-775.
39. Zinn, R. A., C. F. Adam, and M. S. Tamayo. 1995. Interaction of feed intake level on comparative ruminal and total tract digestion of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1239-1245.
40. Zinn, R. A., and F. N. Owens. 1986. A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:157-166.
41. Zinn, R. A., F. N. Owens, and R. A. Ware. 2002. Flaking corn: Processing mechanics, quality standards, and impacts on energy availability and performance of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1145-1156.
42. Zinn, R. A., and A. Plascencia. 1993. Interaction of whole cottonseed and supplemental fat on digestive function in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71:11-17.