Social adjustment and academic achievement: A predictive model for students with diverse academic and behavior competencies

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 493-501

  Ray, Corey E ^a   Elliott, Stephen N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750564263     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bender, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
2. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children's academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302-306.
3. Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2002). Critical levels of perceived social support associated with student adjustment. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), 213-241.
4. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31, 293-297.
5. DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31, 298-312.
6. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7. Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., & Evans-Fernandez, S. E. (1993). Student Self-Concept Scale: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
9. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Lomax, R. G. (1983). A guide to multiple-sample structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15, 580-584.
11. Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: The development of the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39, 1-17.
12. Malecki, C. K., Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (2001). A working manual on the development of the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale. Unpublished manuscript.
13. Merrell, K. W. (1991). Teacher ratings of social competence and behavioral adjustment: Differences between learning-disabled, low-achieving, and typical students. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 207-217.
14. Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 577-586.
15. Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066-1078.
16. Wenz-Gross, M., & Siperstein, G. N. (1998). Students with learning problems at risk in middle school: Stress, social support, and adjustment. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 91-100.
17. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2005). Educational assessment in Wisconsin. Available online at http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/oea/ assessmt.html
18. Zins, J. E., Bloodworm, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2004) The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. In i. Zins, M. Bloodworm, R. Weissberg, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 3-22). New York: Teachers College Press.