Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: Qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Calderón, Carlos ^a   Rotaeche, Rafael ^a   Etxebarria, Arritxu ^b   Marzo, Mercé ^c   Rico, Rosa ^d   Barandiaran, Marta ^e  

^a Alza Health Centre   (Spain)

^b Osakidetza Basque Health Service   (Spain)

^c INSTITUT CATALÀ DE LA SALUT   (Spain)

^d Health Department of the Basque Government   (Spain)

^e Hernani Health Centre   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOGRAPHY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIOLOGY; SPAIN; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ASTHMA; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPAIN;

EID: 33750525482     PISSN: 14726963     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-138     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bonfill X, Marzo M: Guías de práctica clínica: tenerlas, que sean de calidad y que salgan del armario. Med Clin (Barc) 2003, 120:496-497.
2. Rico R, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Asua J, Navarro MA, Reyes A, Marín I, Briones E: Valoración de escalas y criterios para la evaluación de guías de práctica clínica. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2004, 78(4):457-467.
3. Aymerich M, Sánchez E: Del conocimiento científico de la investigación clínica a la cabecera del enfermo: las guías de práctica clínica y su implementación. Gac Sanit 2004, 18:326-334.
4. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O' Connell D, Oxman AD, Philips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, GRADE Working Group: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 2004, 4(1):38.
5. GRADE Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004, 328:1490.
6. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, O' Connell D, Oxman AD, Philips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW, Grade Working Group: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res 2005, 5:25.
7. Marzo M, Alonso P, Rotaeche R: ¿Cómo clasificar la calidad de la evidencia y la fuerza de las recomendaciones? Aten Primaria 2006, 37:5-8.
8. Rotaeche R, Etxeberria A, Marzo M, Rico R, Alonso P: Experiencies with Spanish translation GRADE Lyon: III GIN International Meeting; 2005.
9. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(16):1-274.
10. Popay J, Williams G: Qualitative research and evidence-based health care. J R Soc Med 1998, 91:32-37.
11. Green J, Britten N: Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ 1998, 316:1230-1232.
12. Giacomini MK: The rocky road: qualitative research as evidence. EBM notebook 2001, 6:4-6.
13. Freeman AC, Sweeney K: Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2001, 323:1100-1102.
14. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J: Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2002, 8:145-153.
15. Moreira T: Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Soc Sci Med 2004, 60:1975-1985.
16. Hammersley M, Atkinson P: Etnografía. Métodos de investigación Barcelona, Paidós; 1994.
17. Walker R: Applied Qualitative Research Edited by: Walker R. Hants, Gower; 1985.
18. Conde F: El análisis de la información en la investigación cualitativa. In Introducción a la Investigación Cualitativa. Máster de Investigación en Atención Primaria Edited by: Calderón C, Conde F, Fernández de Sanmamed MJ and Monistrol O. Barcelona, semFYC, UAB, Fundació Dr. Robert; 2003.
19. Calderón C, Rotaeche R, Martínez P, Alonso MT, Manrique E, Sampietro S: ¿Cómo investigamos? Evaluación cualitativa de un estudio sobre calidad del control de los pacientes diabéticos. Aten Primaria 2002, 30.Suplemento I.XXII Congreso Nacional de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria:14.
20. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM: Standardized Reporting of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139(6):493-498.
21. Christiaens T, De Backer D, Burgers J, Baerheim A: Guidelines, evidence, and cultural factors. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004, 22:141-145.
22. Griffiths F, Green E, Tsouroufli M: The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. BMJ 2005, 330:511-515.
23. Greenhalgh T: "Is my practice evidence-based?": Should be answered in qualitative, as well as quantitative terms. BMJ 1996, 313:957-958.
24. Garfield FB, Garfield JM: Clinical judgment and clinical practice guidelines. Intl J of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000, 16:1050-1060.
25. Heathfield HA, Pitty D, Hanka R: Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ 1998, 316:1959-1961.
26. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PC, Rubin HR: Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement. JAMA 1999, 282:1458-1465.
27. Gabbay J, le May A: Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines"?. Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004, 329:1013.
28. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Russell I: Developing clinically valid practice guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 1995, 1:37-48.
29. Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers London, National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Available from: www.nice.org; 2005.
30. Jaime J: Introduction: Practice Gidelines. Helpful Aids or Paradigm Shift? Intl J of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000, 16:957-958.
31. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CFB, Askham J, Marteau T: Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(3):1-88.
32. Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N: Developing clincal guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ 2005, 331:631-633.
33. Ibáñez J: Del algoritmo al sujeto. Perspectivas de la investigación social Madrid, Siglo XXI; 1985.