Diploid porcine parthenotes produced by inhibition of first polar body extrusion during in vitro maturation of follicular oocytes

Reproduction

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 559-570

  Somfai, Tamás ^a,b   Ozawa, Manabu ^a   Noguchi, Junko ^a   Kaneko, Hiroyuki ^a   Ohnuma, Katsuhiko ^a   Karja, Ni Wayan Kurniani ^d   Fahrudin, Mokhamad ^a   Maedomari, Naoki ^c   Dinnyés, András ^b   Nagai, Takashi ^d   Kikuchi, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c AZABU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LIVESTOCK AND GRASSLAND SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHALASIN B; DNA FRAGMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANAPHASE; ANIMAL CELL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMERE; CELL CULTURE; CELL STIMULATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUMULUS OOPHORUS; DIPLOIDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; IN VITRO STUDY; INCIDENCE; METAPHASE; NICK END LABELING; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OVARY FOLLICLE MATURATION; PARTHENOGENESIS; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRONUCLEUS; SWINE; TETRAPLOIDY;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; BLASTOCYST; CELL NUCLEUS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOMES; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; CYTOCHALASIN B; DIPLOIDY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; IN SITU NICK-END LABELING; MALE; OOGENESIS; PARTHENOGENESIS; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 33750517976     PISSN: 14701626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01216     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Balakier H & Tarkowski AK 1976 Diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by heat-shock and Cytochalasin B. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 35 25-39.
2. Cha SK, Kim NH, Lee SM, Baik CS, Lee HT & Chung KS 1997 Effect of cytochalasin B and cycloheximide on the activation rate, chromosome constituent and in vitro development of porcine oocytes following parthenogenetic stimulation. Reproduction Fertility and Development 9 441-446.
3. Delimitreva SM, Zhivkova RS, Tatev ITS & Toncheva DI 2005 Chromosomal disorders and nuclear and cell destruction in cleaving human embryos. International Journal of Developmental Biology 49 409-416.
4. Dinnyes A, Hirao Y & Nagai T 1999 Parthenogenetic activation of porcine oocytes by electric pulse and/or butyrolactone 1 treatment. Cloning 1 209-216.
5. Fukui Y, Sawai K, Furudate M, Sato N, Iwazumi Y & Ohsaki K 1992 Parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes treated with ethanol and cytochalasin B after in vitro maturation. Molecular Reproduction and Development 33 357-362.
6. Funahashi H, Cantley TC & Day BN 1997 Synchronization of meiosis in porcine oocytes by exposure to dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate improves developmental competence following in vitro fertilization. Biology of Reproduction 57 49-53.
7. Hagen DR, Prather RS & First NL 1991 Response of porcine oocytes to electrical and chemical activation during maturation in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development 28 70-73.
8. Henery CC & Kaufman MH 1992 Cleavage rate of haploid and diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos during the preimplantation period. Molecular Reproduction and Development 31 258-263.
9. Jagiello GM, Miller WA, Ducayen MB & Lin JS 1974 Chiasma frequency and disjunctional behavior of ewe and cow oocytes matured in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 10 354-363.
10. Karja NWK, Wongsrikeao P, Murakami M, Agung B, Fahrudin M, Nagai T & Otoi T 2004 Effects of oxygen tension on the development and quality of porcine in vitro fertilized embryos. Theriogenology 62 1585-1595.
11. Kawarsky SJ, Basrur PK, Stubbings RB, Hansen PJ & King WA 1996 Chromosomal abnormalities in bovine embryos and their influence on development. Biology of Reproduction 54 53-59.
12. Kikuchi K, Izaike Y, Noguchi J, Furukawa T, Daen FP, Naito K & Toyoda Y 1995 Decrease of histone H1 kinase activity in relation to parthenogenetic activation of pig follicular oocytes matured and aged in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 105 325-330.
13. Kikuchi K, Nagai T, Ding J, Yamauchi N, Noguchi J & Izaike Y 1999 Cytoplasmic maturation for activation of pig follicular oocytes cultured and arrested at metaphase I. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 116 143-156.
14. Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Akita T & Nagai T 2002 Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biology of Reproduction 66 1033-1041.
15. Kim NH, Uhm SJ, Ju JY, Lee HT & Chung KS 1997a Blastocoele formation and cell allocation to the inner cell mass and trophectoderm in haploid and diploid pig parthenotes developing in vitro. Zygote 5 365-370.
16. Kim NH, Chung KS & Day BN 1997b The distribution and requirements of microtubules and microfilaments during fertilization and parthenogenesis in pig oocytes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 111 143-149.
17. Kubiak J, Paldi A, Weber M & Maro B 1991 Genetically identical parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by inhibition of the first meiotic cleavage with cytochalasin D. Development 111 763-769.
18. Liu L, Trimarchi JR & Keefe DL 2002 Haploidy but not parthenogenetic activation leads to increased incidence of apoptosis in mouse embryos. Biology of Reproduction 66 204-210.
19. Lee JW, Tian XC & Yang X 2004 Optimization of parthenogenetic activation protocol in porcine. Molecular Reproduction and Development 68 51-77.
20. Mrazek M & Fulka F Jr 2003 Failure of oocyte maturation: possible mechanisms for oocyte maturation arrest. Human Reproduction 18 2249-2252.
21. Nussbaum DJ & Prather RS 1995 Differential effects of protein synthesis inhibitors on porcine oocyte activation. Molecular Reproduction and Development 41 70-75.
22. Petters RM & Wells KD 1993 Culture of pig embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 48 61-73.
23. Prather RS, Eichen PA, Nicks DK & Peters MS 1991 Artificial activation of porcine oocytes matured in vitro. Molecular Reproduction and Development 28 405-409.
24. Prochazka R, Vodicka P, Zudova D, Rybar R & Motlik J 2004 Development of in vivo derived diploid and tetraploid pig embryos in a modified medium NCSU 37. Theriogenology 62 155-164.
25. Soewarto D, Schmiady H & Eichenlaub-Ritter U 1995 Consequences of non-extrusion of the first polar body and control of the sequential segregation of homologues and chromatids in mammalian oocytes. Human Reproduction 10 2350-2360.
26. Somfai T, Dinnyes A, Sage D, Marosan M, Carnwath JW, Ozawa M, Kikuchi K & Niemann H 2005 Development to the blastocyst stage of parthenogenetically activated in vitro matured porcine oocytes after Solid Surface Vitrification (SSV). Theriogenology 66 415-422.
27. Somfai T, Kikuchi K, Medvedev S, Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Fuchimoto D, Ozawa M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Ohnuma K, Sato E & Nagai T 2005 Development to the blastocyst stage of immature pig oocytes arrested before the metaphase-11 stage and fertilized in vitro. Animal Reproduction Science 90 307-328.
28. Wang WH, Machaty Z, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS & Day BN 1998 Parthenogenetic activation of pig oocytes with calcium ionophore and the block to sperm penetration after activation. Biology of Reproduction 58 1357-1366.
29. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Han YM, Prather RS & &Day BN 1999 Morphologic evaluation and actin filament distribution in porcine embryos produced in vitro and in vivo. Biology of Reproduction 60 1020-1028.
30. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS & Day BN 2000 Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early development. Biology of Reproduction 62 1177-1183.
31. Wassarman PM, Josefowicz WJ & Letourneau GE 1976 Meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes in vitro: inhibition of maturation at specific stages of nuclear progression. Journal of Cell Science 22 531-545.
32. Yoshizawa M, Matsukawa A, Matsumoto K, Suzuki K, Yasumatsu K, Zhu S & Muramatsu S 1998 Required concentration and time of vinblastine treatment for chromosome preparation in bovine blastocysts derived from in vitro fertilization. Journal of Reproduction and Development 44 59-64.