Development of in vivo derived diploid and tetraploid pig embryos in a modified medium NCSU 37

Theriogenology

Volumn 62, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 155-164

  Prochazka R ^a,b   Vodicka P ^a,b   Zudova D ^c   Rybar R ^c   Motlik J ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Culture; Embryo; NCSU 37; Pig; Ploidy

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL FUSION; CULTURE MEDIUM; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DIPLOIDY; EMBRYO; MOSAICISM; POLYPLOIDY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SWINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CELL FUSION; CULTURE MEDIA; CULTURE TECHNIQUES; DIPLOIDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; MOSAICISM; OXYGEN; POLYPLOIDY; SWINE;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 2642587572     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beckmann L.S., Day B.N. Effect of medium NaCl concentration and osmolarity ion culture of the early stage porcine embryo and viability of embryos cultured in a selected superior medium. Theriogenology. 39:1993;611-622
2. Petters R.M., Wells K.D. Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 48:1993;61-73
3. Dobrinsky J.R., Johnson L.A., Rath D. Development of a culture medium (BECM-3) for porcine embryos: effect of bovine serum albumin and fetal bovine serum on embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 55:1996;1069-1074
4. Machaty Z., Day B.N., Prather R.S. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 59:1998;451-455
5. Long C.R., Dobrinski J.R., Johnson L.A. In vitro production of pig embryos: comparison of culture media and boars. Theriogenology. 51:1999;1375-1390
6. Peters J.K., Milliken G., Davis D.L. Development of porcine embryos in vitro: effects of culture medium and donor age. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2001;1578-1583
7. Kikuchi K., Onishi A., Kashiwazaki N., Iwamoto M., Noguchi J., Kaneko H., et al. Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol. Reprod. 66:2002;1033-1041
8. Nagy A., Rossant J., Nagy R., Abramow-Newerly W., Roder J.C. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:1993;8424-8428
9. Ueda O., Jishage K., Kamada N., Uchida S., Suzuki H. Production of mice entirely derived from embryonic stem (ES) cell with many passages by coculture of ES cells with cytochalasin B induced tetraploid embryos. Exp. Anim. 44:1995;205-210
10. Wang Z.Q., Kiefer F., Urbanek P., Wagner E.F. Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutnt mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection. Mech. Dev. 62:1997;137-145
11. Amano T., Kato Y., Tsunoda Y. Comparison of heat-treted and tetraploid blastocysts for the production of completely ES-cell-derived mice. Zygote. 9:2001;153-157
12. Prather R.S., Hoffman K.E., Schoenbeck R.A., Stumpf T.T., Li J. Characterization of DNA synthesis during the two-cell stage and the production of tetraploid chimeric pig embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 45:1996;38-42
13. Butler J.E., Anderson G.B., BonDurant R.H., Pashen R.L., Penedo M.C. Production of ovine chimeras by inner cell mass transplantation. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1987;317-324
14. O'Neill G.T., Speirs S., Kaufman M.H. Sex chromosome constitution of post-implantation tetraploid mouse embryos. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 53:1990;191-195
15. Eglitis M.A. Formation of tetraploid mouse blastocysts following blastomere fusion with polyethyleneglycol. J. Exp. Zool. 213:1980;309-313
16. Spindle A. Polyetylene glycol-induced fusion of two-cell mouse embryo blastomeres. Exp. Cell Res. 131:1981;465-470
17. Krivokharchenko A., Galat V., Ganten D., Bader M. In vitro formation of tetraploid rat blastocysts after fusion of two-cell embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 61:2002;160-465
18. Kubiak J.Z., Tarkowski A.K. Electrofusion of mouse blastomeres. Exp. Cell Res. 157:1985;561-566
19. Edwards R.G. Colchicine induced heteroploidy in the mouse: II. The induction of tetraploidy and other types of heteroploidy. J. Exp. Zool. 137:1958;349-362
20. Snow M.H. Tetraploid mouse embryos produced by cytochalasin B during cleavage. Nature. 244:1973;513-515
21. Lu T.Y., Markert C.L. Manufacture of diploid/tetraploid chimeric mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:1980;6012-6016
22. Koizumi N., Fukuta K. Pre-implantation development of tetraploid mouse embryo produced by cytochalasin B. Exp. Anim. 44:1995;105-109
23. Ozil J.P., Modlinski J.A. Effects of electric field on fusion rate and survival of two-cell rabbit embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 96:1986;211-228
24. Iwasaki S., Kono T., Fukutsu H., Nakahara T. Production of bovine tetraploid embryos by electrofusion and their developmental capability in vitro. Gamete Res. 24:1989;261-267
25. Curnow E.C., Gunn I.M., Trounson A.O. Electrofusion of two-cell bovine embryos for the production of tetraploid blastocysts in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56:2000;372-377
26. Yerle M., Goureau A., Gellin J., Le Tissier P., Moran C. Rapid mapping of cosmid clones on pig chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mamm. Genome. 5:1994;34-37
27. Martini E., Flaherty S.P., Swann N.J., Payne D., Matthews C.D. Analysis of unfertilized oocytes subjected to intracytoplasmatic sperm injection using two rounds of fluorescence in situ hybridization and probes to five chromosomes. Hum. Reprod. 12:1997;2011-2018
28. Funahashi H., Kim N.H., Stumpf T.T., Cantley T.C., Day B.N. Presence of organic osmolytes in maturation medium enhances cytoplasmic maturation of porcine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 54:1996;1412-1419
29. Yoshioka K., Suzuki C., Tanaka A., Anas I.M.-K., Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66:2002;112-119
30. Henery C.C., Kaufman M.H. Cleavage rates of diploid and tetraploid mouse embryos during pre-implantation period. J. Exp. Zool. 259:1991;371-378
31. James R.M., Kaufman M.H., Webb S., West J.D. Electrofusion of mouse embryos results in uniform tetraploidy and not tetraploid/diploid mosaicism. Genet. Res. 60:1992;185-194