Structural effects on the ground and excited-state properties of photoswitchable hydrogen-bonding receptors

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 71, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 8523-8531

  Molard, Yann ^a   Bassani, Dario M ^b   Desvergne, Jean Pierre ^b   Moran, Nina ^c   Tucker, James H R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOPHORES; DIMERIZATION; GROUND STATE; PHOTOCHROMISM; REACTION KINETICS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

BINDING ABILITY; EXCIMERS; PHOTOCYCLIZATION; PHOTODIMERIZATION;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

ALKANE DERIVATIVE; ANTHRACENE; ANTHRACENE DERIVATIVE; BARBITAL; BARBITURIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BUTANOL; CARBENE; CHLORTALIDONE; HYDROGEN BOND RECEPTOR; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHROMATOPHORE; COVALENT BOND; DIMERIZATION; EXCITED STATE; GROUND STATE; HYDROGEN BOND; NONHUMAN; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTOSENSITIVITY; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33750481900     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo061528a     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. (a) Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry, Concepts and Perspectives; VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
2. (b) Petitjean, A.; Kyritsakas, N.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6818 and references therein.
3. For a review of switchable binding processes at a surface, see: Cooke, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4860.
4. (a) Asanuma, H.; Takarada, T.; Yoshida, T.; Tamaru, D.; Liang, X. G.; Komiyama, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2671.
5. (b) Woolley, G. A.; Jaikaran, A. S. I.; Berezovski, M.; Calarco, J. P.; Krylov, S. N.; Smart, O. S.; Kumita, J. R. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 6075 and references therein.
6. (c) Volgraf, M.; Gorostiza, P.; Numano, R.; Kramer, R. H.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Trauner, D. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 47 and references therein.
7. For a recent review of switchable processes in rotaxanes, see: Tian, H.; Wang, Q. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 361.
8. For recent examples of substrate-switched (e.g., allosteric) binding, see: (a) Abe, H.; Masuda, N.; Waki, M.; Inouye, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16189 and references therein.
9. (b) Amendola, V.; Esteban-Gomez, D.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Monzani, E.; Sancenon, F. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 8690.
10. For examples and reviews of redox-switched binding processes, see: (a) Bu, J. J.; Lilienthal, N. D.; Woods, J. E.; Nohrden, C. E.; Hoang, K. T.; Truong, D.; Smith, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6423 and references therein.
11. (b) Tucker, J. H. R.; Collinson, S. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 147.
12. For examples and reviews of photoswitched binding of metal cations, see: (a) Shinkai, S.; Nakaji, T.; Nishida, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Manabe, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5860.
13. (b) Kimura, K.; Sakamoto, H.; Nakamura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 225.
14. (c) Alfimov, M. V.; Fedorova, O. A.; Gromov, S. P. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2003, 158, 183.
15. (d) Bacchi, A.; Carcelli, M.; Pelizzi, C.; Pelizzi, G.; Pelagatti, P.; Rogolino, D.; Tegoni, M.; Viappiani, C. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 5871.
16. (e) Desvergne, J.-P.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Perez-Inestrosa, E.; Marsau, P.; Cotrait, M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 185-186, 257 and references therein.
17. For photoswitched binding of charged or neutral molecules, see: (a) Ueno, A.; Yoshimura, H.; Saka, R.; Osa, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2779.
18. (b) Mulder, A.; Jukovic, A.; Huskens, J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1748 and references therein;
19. (c) Hunter, C. A.; Togrul, M.; Tomas, S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 108.
20. Goodman, A.; Breinlinger, E.; Ober, M.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6213.
21. Bouas-Laurent, H.; Dürr, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 639.
22. For examples and reviews of related H-bonding photoresponsive systems, see: (a) Huang, C. H.; Bassani D. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 4041.
23. (b) Yagai, S.; Karatsu, T.; Kitamura, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4054.
24. (c) Vida Pol, Y.; Suau, R.; Perez-Inestrosa, E.; Bassani, D. M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1270 and references therein.
25. Lucas, L. N.; van Esch, J.; Kellogg, R. M.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Commun. 2001, 759.
26. (e) Vollmer, M. S.; Clark, T. D.; Steinem, C.; Ghadiri, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1598.
27. (f) Würther, F.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 446.
28. (g) Irie, M.; Miyatake, O.; Uchida, K.; Eriguchi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9894.
29. (h) Bassani, D. M.; Sallenave, X.; Darcos, V.; Desvergne, J.-P. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1446.
30. (a) Bouas-Laurent, H.; Castellan, A.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Lapouyade, R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 43.
31. (b) Bouas-Laurent, H.; Castellan, A.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Lapouyade, R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 248.
32. (c) McSkimming, G.; Tucker, J. H. R.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Light, M. E. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 3331 and references therein.
33. Desvergne, J.-P.; Bitit, N.; Castellan, A.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Soulignac, J.-C. J. Lumin. 1987, 37, 175.
34. (e) Ferguson, J.; Castellan, A.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Bouas-Laurent, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 78, 446 and references therein.
35. (f) Marquis, D.; Desvergne, J.-P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 230, 131.
36. For other examples of photoswitched cation binding via anthracene photodimerization, see: (a) Schafer, C.; Mattay, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 331.
37. (b) Ikegami, M.; Ohshiro, I.; Arai, T. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1566.
38. (c) Deng, G.; Sakaki, T.; Nakashima, K.; Shinkai, S. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1287.
39. For examples of photoswitched cation transport via anthracene photodimerization, see: (a) Xu, M.; Fu, X. G.; Wu, L. Z.; Zhang, L. P.; Tung, C. H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 4030.
40. (d) Jin, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1379.
41. (a) Chang, S.-K.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1318.
42. (b) Chang, S.-K.; Van Engen, D.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7640.
43. For examples of supramolecular assemblies based on barbiturate-receptor interactions, see: (a) Lipkowski, P.; Bielejewska, A.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1311.
44. (b) Prins, L. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Timmerman, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2382.
45. (c) Russell, K. C.; Lehn, J. M.; Kyritsakas, N.; DeCian, A.; Fischer, J. New J. Chem. 1998, 22, 123.
46. (d) Berl, V.; Schmutz, M.; Krische, M. J.; Khoury, R. G.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1227.
47. (e) Kolomiets, E.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1519.
48. (f) Kolomiets, E.; Buhler, E.; Candau, S. J.; Lehn, J. M. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 1173.
49. (g) Dirksen, A.; Hahn, U.; Schwanke, F.; Nieger, M.; Reek, J. N. H.; Voegtle, F.; De Cola, L. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 2036.
50. (h) Dirksen, A.; Kleverlaan, C. J.; Reek, J. N. H.; De Cola, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5248.
51. (i) McClenaghan, N. D.; Grote, Z.; Darriet, K.; Zimine, M.; Williams, R. M.; De Cola, L.; Bassani, D. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 807.
52. (j) Schmittel, M.; Kalsani, V. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 245, 1.
53. Molard, Y.; Bassani, D. M.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Horton, P. N.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Tucker, J. H. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1072.
54. Schönberg. A. Preparative Organic Photochemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1968; p 492.
55. No significant changes in the percentage fatigue were found from cycling in the presence of an excess amount of barbital.
56. (a) Sillen, L. G.; Warnqvist, B. Ark. Kemi 1968, 31, 377.
57. (b) Sillen, L. G.; Warnqvist, B. Ark. Kemi 1968, 31, 315.
58. (b) Havel, J. Haltafal-Spefo program; Mazaryle University: Brno, Moravia, Czech Republic.
59. Hynes, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 311.
60. The H-bonded amide proton at 9.5 ppm in T4C underwent an upfield shift of 0.15 ppm upon the addition of 5 equiv of barbital to indicate a disruption of the intermolecular H-bonding interactions. Complexation of barbital also affected the signal for the isophthaloyl proton of each receptor, which moved downfield due to its proximity to the apical CO of guest (e.g., +0.2, +0.1. and +0.16 ppm. respectively, for T3, T3C, and T6C).
61. (a) Melhuish, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65, 229.
62. (b) Eaton, D. E. In Handbook of Organic Photochemistry, Vol. I; Scaiano, J. C., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
63. It is also possible that the excimer is in equilibrium with the locally excited-state.
64. The reduced spacer length in T1 is expected to limit the mobility of the chromophores due to restricted conformational freedom of the amide linker. The ensuing biexponential decay may be due to the presence of excimer fluorescence or kinetically distinct nonequilibrating locally excited-states.
65. Hamilton, A. D.; Van Engen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5035.
66. In the case of T6C, the addition of barbital also had a significant effect on the shift of other proton signals. In particular, the signals for the OCH2 and the central photodimer CH protons moved downfield by +0.37 and +0.17 ppm, respectively.
67. Hager, K.; Franz, A.; Hirsch, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2663.
68. Castellan, A.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Bouas-Laurent, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 76, 390.
69. de Roek, T.; Boens, N.; Dockx, J. DECAN 1.0; Leuven, Belgium, 1991.