Modeling Variably Saturated Flow Using Kinematic Waves in MODFLOW

Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States

Volumn 9, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-112

  Niswonger, Richard G ^a,b   Prudic, David E ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater flow Southwestern States

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886331891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/009WSA07     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bixio, A. C, M. Putti, S. Orlandini, and C. Paniconi, Physically-based distributed model for coupled surface runoff and subsurface flow simulation at the catchment scale, in Proceedings of the XIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 25-29, 2000, edited by L.R. Bently, J.F. Shykes, C.A., Brebbia, W.G Gray, and J.E Pinder, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 1115-1122, 2000.
2. Brooks, R.H., and A.T. Corey, Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow, ASCEJ. oflrrig. and Drain., 101, 85-92, 1966.
3. Childs, E.C., and M. Bybordi, The vertical movement of water in stratified porous material, 1. Infiltration, Water Resour. Res., 5, 445-459, 1969.
4. Freeze, R.A., The mechanisms of natural groundwater recharge and discharge 1. One-dimensional, vertical, unsteady, unsaturated flow above a recharging or discharging groundwater flow system, Water Resour. Res., 5, 153-171, 1969.
5. Freeze, R.A., and J. Banner, The mechanism of natural groundwater recharge and discharge 2. Laboratory column experiments and field measurements, Water Resour. Res., 6, 138-155, 1970.
6. Freeze, R.A., and R.L. Harlan, Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, J. Hydro!., 9, 237-258, 1969.
7. Healy, R.W., Simulation of solute transport in variably saturated porous media with supplemental information on modification of the U.S. Geological Survey's computer program VS2D, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 90-4025, 125 pp., 1990.
8. Jobson, H.E., and A.W. Harbaugh, Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (DAFLOW) for coupling to the modular finite-difference groundwater flow model (MOD-FLOW), U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 99-217, 107 pp., 1999.
9. Leavesley, G.H., Restrepo,PJ., Markstrom, S.L., Dixon,M., and Stannard, L.G, The modular modeling system (MMS)-User's manual: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-151, 142 p., 1996.
10. Leavesley, G.H., Lichty, R.W., Troutman, B.M., and Saindon, L.G., Precipitation-runoff modeling system-User's manual: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 83-4238, 207 p., 1983.
11. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh, A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model, U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. ofWater Resour. Invest, 6-A1, 586 pp., 1988.
12. Mein, R.G, and C.L. Larson, Modeling infiltration during a steady rain, Water Resour. Res., 9, 384-394, 1973.
13. Montgomery and Watson Engineers, Documentation and User Manual for Integrated Groundwater and Surface Water Model, Montgomery and Watson Engineers, Sacramento, Calif, 164 pp., 1993.
14. Moore, J.E., and C.T. Jenkins, An evaluation of the effect of groundwater pumpage on the infiltration rate of a semipervious streambed, Water Resour. Res., 2, 691-696, 1966.
15. Peterson, D.M., Modeling the effects of variably saturated flow on stream losses, in Conference on the Use of Models to Analyze and Find Working Solutions to Solving Groundwater Problems with Models, 4th, Indianapolis, Indiana, International Groundwater Modeling Center, Halcomb Research Institute, Butler University, 899-927, 1989.
16. Peterson, D.M., and H. Zhang, Simulation of stream losses affected by the vadose zone, in Proceedings of the XIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 25-29, 2000, edited by L.R. Bently, J.F. Shykes, C.A., Brebbia, W.G. Gray, and J.F. Pinder, AABalkema, Rotterdam, 1131-1138, 2000.
17. Prudic, D.E., Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, groundwater flow model, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 88-729, 113 pp., 1989.
18. Refsgaard, J.C., and B. Storm, MIKE SHE, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by V.P. Singh, Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO., 809-846, 1995.
19. Ronan, A.D., D.E. Prudic, C.E. Thodal, and J. Constantz, Field study of diurnal temperature effects of infiltration and variably saturated flow beneath an ephemeral stream, Water Resour. Res., 34, 2137-2153, 1998.
20. Smith, R.E., Approximate soil water movement by kinematic characteristics, SoilSci. Soc. Am. J., 41, 3-8, 1983.
21. Smith, R.E., and R.H.B. Hebbert, Mathematical simulation of interdependent surface and subsurface hydrologic processes, Water Resour. Res., 19, 987-1001, 1983.
22. Smith, R.E., K.R.J. Smettem, P. Broadbridge, and D.A. Woolhiser, Infiltration theory for hydrologic applications, Water Resour. Mono., 15, 212 pp., 2002.
23. Swain, E.D., and E.J. Wexler, A coupled surface-water and groundwater flow model for simulation of stream-aquifer interaction: U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 6-A6, 125 pp., 1996.
24. Sophocleous, M., and S.P. Perkins, Methodology and application of combined watershed and groundwater model in Kansas. J. Hydrol, 236, 185-201, 2000.
25. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS, Technical reference manual, Davis, CA, Hydrologic Engineering Center, CPD-748, 149 p, 2000.
26. VanderKwaak, J.E., and K. Loague, Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resour. Res., 37, 999-1013, 2001.
27. Vauclin, M., D. Khanji, and G. Vachaud, Experimental and numerical study of a transient, two-dimensional unsaturated-saturated water table recharge problem, Water Resour. Res., 15, 1089-1101, 1979.