A computational framework for retrieval of document fragments based on decomposition schemes in engineering information management

Advanced Engineering Informatics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 401-413

  Liu, S ^a   McMahon, C A ^a   Darlington, M J ^a   Culley, S J ^a   Wild, P J ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational framework; Decomposition schemes; Document mark up; Faceted classification; Fragment retrieval; XML

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; INFORMATION USE; XML;

COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK; DECOMPOSITION SCHEMES; DOCUMENT FRAGMENT RETRIEVAL; DOCUMENT MARK-UP; FACETED CLASSIFICATION;

IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

EID: 33750475627     PISSN: 14740346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2006.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. R.L. Larsen, H.D. Wactlar, Knowledge Lost in Information, Report of the NSF Workshop on Research Directions for Digital Libraries, Chatham, MA, 2003.
2. P. Waddington, Dying for information? A report on the effects of information overload in the UK and worldwide, British Library Research and Innovation Report 78. , 1997 (accessed 04.11.05).
3. Hameri A.P., and Nihtil J. Product data management - exploratory study on state-of-the-art in one-of-a-kind industry. Computers in Industry 35 3 (1998) 195-206
4. W.A. Woods, Conceptual Indexing: a better way to organize knowledge, Report No. SMLI TR-97-61, April 1997, Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Calif.
5. Harper D.J., Koychev I., Sun Y., and Pirie I. Within-document retrieval: a user-centred evaluation of relevance profiling. Information Retrieval 7 3-4 (2004) 265-290
6. Baeza-Yates R., and Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval (1999), ACM Press
7. A. Lowe, C.A. McMahon, T. Shah, S.J. Culley, A method for the study of information use profiles for design engineers, ASME Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas, DTM-8753, 1999.
8. M. Aurisicchio, P.M. Langdon, S. Ahmed, K.M. Wallace, Investigating knowledge searches in aerospace design, in: ICED03, 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003, pp. 293-294.
9. Fidel R., and Green M. The many faces of accessibility: engineers' perception of information sources. Information Processing and Management 40 3 (2004) 563-581
10. T. Shaw, Documents and document fragments, 1999. Available from: .
11. W3C, Fragment definition, REC-DOM-Level-1-19981001.
12. Blair D.C. The challenge of commercial document retrieval, Part 2: A strategy for document searching based on identifiable document partition. Information Processing and Management 38 2 (2002) 293-304
13. Hatano K., Kinutani H., Amagasa T., Mori Y., Yoshikawa M., and Uemura S. Analysing the properties of XML fragments decomposed from the INEX document collection, Advances in XML Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3493 (2005) 168-182
14. Van Zwol R., Wiering F., and Dignum V. The Utrecht blend: basic ingredients for an XML retrieval system, Advances in XML Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3493 (2005) 140-152
15. Bose S., Fegaras L., Levine D., and Chaluvadi V. A query algebra for fragmented XML stream data. Database Programming Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2921 (2004) 195-215
16. Blair D.C. The challenge of commercial document retrieval, Part 1: Major issues, and a framework based on search exhaustivity, determinacy of representation and document collection size. Information Processing and Management 38 2 (2002) 273-291
17. Flasca S., Manco G., Masciari E., Pontueri L., and Pugliese A. Fast detection of XML structural similarity. IEEE transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 2 (2005) 160-175
18. D.G. Watson, A brief history of document mark-up, 2002. Available from: .
19. McMahon C., Crossland R., Lowe A., Shah T., Sims Williams J., and Culley J. No zero match browsing of hierarchically categorised information entities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16 (2002) 243-257
20. M. Lehtonen, Document assembly with XML structured source data, 2001. Available from: .
21. Knobloch M., and Kopp M. Web Design with XML (2003), Wiley
22. Erdmann M., and Studer R. How to structure and access XML documents with ontologies. Data and Knowledge Engineering 36 (2001) 317-335
23. Darlington M. Document decomposition for engineering information access support, Internal Report No. 04/05, University of Bath, 2005.
24. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Available from: .
25. Quatrani T. Visual modelling with Rational Rose 2000 and UML (2000), Addison-Wesley
26. Kingston J., and Macintosh A. Knowledge management through multi-perspective modelling: representing and distributing organisational memory. Knowledge Based Systems 13 2-3 (2000)
27. T. Kudrass, T. Krumbein, Rule-based generation of XML DTDs from UML class diagrams, in: Proceedings of Advances Databases and Information Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2798 (2003) 339-354.
28. DTD, W3C. Available from: .
29. DOM, W3C. Available from: .
30. S. Liu, An exploration of computational support for retrieval of document fragments, Internal Report No. 08/05, University of Bath, 2005.
31. J.D. Eisenberg, SVG Essentials, O'Reilly: Beijing, Cambridge, Farnharm, Koln, Paris, Sebastopol, Taipei, Tokyo, 2002.
32. XML, W3C. Available from: .
33. D. Brodie, A. Gupta, W.S. Shi, Accelerating dynamic Web content delivery using keyword-based fragment detection, in: Web Engineering-Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3140 (2004) 359-372.
34. Gupta S., Kaiser G.E., Grimm P., Chiang M.F., and Starren J. Automating content extraction of HTML documents. World Wide Web - Internet and Web Information Systems 8 2 (2005) 179-224
35. Crestani F., Vegas J., and de la Fuente P. A graphical user interface for the retrieval of hierarchical structured documents. Information Processing and Management 40 2 (2004) 269-289
36. Rowley J., and Farrow J. Organising Knowledge. third ed. (2000), Gower Publishing
37. Foskett A.C. The Subject Approach to Information. fifth ed. (1996), Library Association Publishing, London
38. S.R. Ranganathan, Philosophy of Library Classification, Copenhagen, E. Munksgaard, 1951.
39. Taylor A. Introduction to Cataloguing and Classification (1992), Libraries Unlimited
40. P. Singh, Faceted Classification: The right choice in electronic environment, 2004. Available from: .
41. Mills J. Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval. Library Trends 52 3 (2004) 541-570
42. McMahon C., Lowe A., Culley S., Corderoy M., Crossland R., Shah T., and Stewart D. Waypoint: an integrated search and retrieval system for engineering documents. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 4 4 (2004) 329-338
43. Lizorkin D.A., and Lisovsky K.Y. Implemetation of the XML linking language XLink by functional methods. Programming and Computer Software 319 1 (2005) 34-46
44. XLink and XPointer, W3C. Available from: .
45. McMahon C., and Browne J. CADCAM principles, practice and manufacturing management. second ed. (1998), Addison-Wesley
46. P.J. Wild, C.A. McMahon, S.J. Culley, M.J. Darlington, S. Liu, A Diary Study in the Engineering Domain. In: J.S. Gero, N. Bonnardel (Eds.), International Workshop on Understanding Designers'05, Aix-en-Provence, 17-18 October 2005.
47. Liu G.Z. Semantic vector space model: implementation and evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 5 (1997) 395-417
48. Kolda T.G., and O'Leary D.P. A semidiscrete matrix decomposition for latent semantics indexing in information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 16 4 (1998) 322-346
49. Hristidis V., Koudas N., Papakonstantinou Y., and Srivastava D. Keyword proximity search in XML trees. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 18 4 (2006) 525-539
50. Sadakane K., and Imai H. Fast algorithms for k-word proximity search. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences E84A 9 (2001) 2311-2318
51. Borzemski L., and Lopatka P. Complementing search engines with text mining. Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3533 (2005) 743-745
52. Gong R.B., and Chan T.K.Y. Syllable alignment: a novel model for phonetic string search. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E89D 1 (2006) 332-339
53. G. Ruibin, C.K. Yun, An adaptive model for phonetic string search, in: Knowledge-based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, PT 3, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3683 (2005) 915-921.
54. M. Agosti, M. Bacchin, N. Ferro, M. Melucci, Improving the automatic retrieval of text documents, Advances in Cross-Language Information Retrieval Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2785 (2003) 279-290.
55. Ahmed S., and Wallace K.M. Identifying and supporting the knowledge needs of novice designers within the aerospace industry. Journal of Engineering Design 15 5 (2004) 475-492
56. D. Pawson, XSL - FO, O'Reilly, 2002.
57. M. Lehtonen, R. Petit, O. Heinonen, G. Linden, A dynamic user interface for document assembly, in: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, Mclean, Virginia, USA, 2002, pp. 131-141.