A graphical user interface for the retrieval of hierarchically structured documents

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 269-289

  Crestani, Fabio ^a   Vegas, Jesús ^b   De la Fuente, Pablo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Graphical user interface; Information retrieval; Structured document retrieval

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HTML; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); QUERY LANGUAGES; SGML; XML;

DOCUMENT STRUCTURE; QUERY REFINEMENT;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0346896758     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00120-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agosti M., Crestani F., Melucci M. On the use of information retrieval techniques for the automatic construction of hypertexts. Information Processing and Management. 33(2):1997;133-144.
2. Agosti M., Smeaton A. Information retrieval and hypertext. 1996;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA.
3. Baeza-Yates R., Ribeiro-Nieto B. Modern information retrieval. 1999;Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK.
4. Barker P. Interactive electronic books. Interactive Multimedia. 2(1):1991;11-28.
5. Baumgarten, C. (1997). A probabilistic model for distributed information retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR (pp. 258-266). Philadelphia, USA.
6. Belew R. Finding out about: A cognitive perspective on search engines technology and the WWW. 2000;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Bordogna G., Pasi G. Flexible representation and querying of heterogeneous structured documents. Kibernetika. 36(6):2000;617-633.
8. Callan, J. (1994). Passage-level evidence in document retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR (pp. 302-310). Dublin, Ireland.
9. Carroll J., Mack R., Kellog W. Interface metaphors and user interface design. Helander M. Handbook of human computer interaction. 1988;67-85 Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, Holland.
10. Chiaramella, Y. (2001). Information retrieval and structured documents. In M. Agosti, F. Crestani, G. Pasi (Series Eds.), Lectures notes in computer science: Vol. 1980. Lectures on information retrieval (pp. 291-314). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
11. Chiaramella, Y., Mulhem, P., & Fourel, F. (1996). A model for multimedia information retrieval. Technical report FERMI/96/4, ESPRIT Basic Research Action, project number 8134 - FERMI, Department of Computing Science, Glasgow University.
12. Crestani, F., de la Fuente, P., & Vegas, J. (2001). Design of a graphical user interface for focussed retrieval of structured documents. In Proceedings of SPIRE 2001, symposium on string processing and information retrieval (pp. 246-249). Laguna de San Rafael, Chile.
13. Crestani F., Lalmas M., van Rijsbergen C., Campbell I. Is this document relevant? ⋯probably. A survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval. ACM Computing Surveys. 30(4):1998;528-552.
14. Crestani F., Ntioudis S. User centred evaluation of an automatically constructed hyper-textbook. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 11(1):2002;3-19.
15. Cutler, M., Shih, Y., & Meng, W. (1997). Using the structure of HTML documents to improve retrieval. In Proceedings of the USENIX symposium on Internet technologies and systems (pp. 241-251). Monterey, CA, USA.
16. De Campos, L., Fernandez-Luna, J., & Huete, J. (2002). A layered Bayesian network model for document retrieval. In Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG European colloquium on information retrieval research (pp. 169-182). Glasgow, UK.
17. Diez, G., & Rostaing, A. (2001). Docball: una interfaz de consulta para recuperacion de documentos XML. M.Sc. Thesis, Departamento de Informatica, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
18. Dunlop, M., & McDonald, K. (2000). Supporting different search strategies in a video query interface. In Proceedings of the RIAO conference. Paris, France.
19. Frakes W., Baeza-Yates R. Information retrieval: Data structures and algorithms. 1992;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
20. Frisse M. Searching for information in a medical handbook. Communications of the ACM. 31(7):1988;880-886.
21. Hauptmann A., Witbrock M. Informedia news-on-demand: Using speech recognition to create a digital video library. Maybury M. Intelligent multimedia information retrieval. 1997;215-240 AIII Press/The MIT Press, MenloPark, CA, USA.
22. Hearst, M. (1995). TileBars: visualisation of term distribution information in full text information access. In Proceedings of CHI'95 (pp. 59-66). Denver, CO, USA.
23. Ingwersen P. Information retrieval interaction. 1992;Taylor Graham, London, UK.
24. Kerkouba, D. (1985). Indexation automatique et aspects structurels des textes. In Proceedings of the RIAO conference (pp. 227-249). Grenoble, France.
25. Kim J., Oard W. The use of speech retrieval systems: A study design. Coden A., Brown E., Srinivasan S. Information retrieval techniques for speech applications. 2002;87-93 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
26. Kleinberg, J. (1998). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (pp. 668-677). San Francisco, CA, USA.
27. Lalmas, M., & Moutogianni, E. (2000). A Dempster-Shafer indexing for the focussed retrieval of a hierarchically structured document space: Implementation and experiments on a web museum collection. In Proceedings of the RIAO conference. Paris, France.
28. Lalmas M., Ruthven I. Representing and retrieving structured documents with Dempster-Shafer's theory of evidence: Modelling and evaluation. Journal of Documentation. 54(5):1998;529-565.
29. Myaeng, S., Jang, D., Kim, M., & Zhoo, Z. (1998). A flexible model for retrieval of SGML document. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR (pp. 138-145). Melbourne, Australia.
30. Navarro G., Baeza-Yates R. Proximal nodes: A model to query document databases by content and structure. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 15(4):1997;400-435.
31. Pejtersen, A., & Fidel, R. (1998). A framework for work centred evaluation and design: A case study of IR and the Web. Working paper for Mira Workshop, Grenoble, France.
32. Roelleke, T. (1999). POOL: Probabilistic object-oriented logical representation and retrieval of complex objects - A model for hypermedia retrieva. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Dortmund, Germany.
33. Roelleke, T., Lalmas, M., Kazai, G., Ruthven, I., & Quicker, S. (2002). The accessibility dimension for structured document retrieval. In Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG European colloquium on information retrieval research (pp. 284-302). Glasgow, UK.
34. Salton G. Automatic information organization and retrieval. 1968;McGraw Hill, New York.
35. Salton, G., & Allan, J. (1994). Automatic text decomposition and structuring. In Proceedings of the RIAO conference: Vol. 1 (pp. 6-20). Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
36. Salton G., Allan J., Buckley C. Automatic structuring and retrieval of large text files. Communications of the ACM. 37(2):1994;97-108.
37. Shneiderman B. Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 11(1):1992;92-99.
38. Southall R. Interfaces between the designer and the document. Andre J., Furuta R., Quint V. Structured documents. 1989;119-131 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Spence R. Information visualization. 2001;Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK.
40. Vegas, J. (1999). Un Sistema de Recuperación de Información sobre Estructura y Contenido. Ph.D. Thesis, Departamento de Informática, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
41. Wilkinson, R. (1994). Effective retrieval of structured documents. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR (pp. 311-317). Dublin, Ireland.