Globalisation and international higher education: Contested positionings

Journal of Studies in International Education

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 319-333

  Dixon, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Globalisatio; International higher education; Positioning; Story lines

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750461610     PISSN: 10283153     EISSN: 15527808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1028315306287789     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
2. Apple, M. (1999). Rhetorical reforms: Markets, standards and inequality. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 1 (2). Retrieved May 12, 2000, from www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/ma112.htm
3. Atkinson, E. (2003). The postmodern prism: Fracturing certainty in educational research. In J. Swann & J. Pratt (Eds.), Educational research in practice (pp. 35-50). London: Continuum.
4. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
5. Buenfil-Burgos, R. N. (2000). Globalization, education and discourse political analysis: Ambiguity and accountability in research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13 (1), 1-24.
6. Carnoy, M. (1998). Globalisation and educational reform. Melbourne Studies in Education, 39 (2), 21-40.
7. Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What does globalisation mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 46 (1), 1-9.
8. Castells, M. (1999). Flows, networks and identities: A critical theory of the informational society. In M. Castells, R. Flecha, P. Friere, H. Giroux, D. Macedo, & P. Willis (Eds.), Critical education in the new information age (pp. 37-64). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9. Clyne, F., Marginson, S., & Woock, R. (2001). International education in Australian universities: Concepts and definitions. Melbourne Studies in Education, 42 (1), 111-127.
10. Dale, R., & Robertson, S. L. (2003). Editorial introduction. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1 (1), 3-11.
11. Daly, H. E. (1999). Globalisation versus internationalisation: Some implications. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved February 19, 2002, from http://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/econ/herman2.htm
12. Davies, B., &, Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20 (1), 43-63.
13. Dixon, M. (1995). The curriculum decision to teach in English in schools in Kathmandu. Unpublished research project, the University of Melbourne, Australia.
14. Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (1997). Final frontiers? Globalisation, pedagogy and (dis)location. Curriculum Studies, 5 (3), 253-268.
15. Ganderton, P. (1996). Concepts of globalisation and their impact upon curriculum policy-making: Rhetoric and reality - A study of Australian reform. International Journal Educational Development, 16 (4), 393-405.
16. Green, A. (1997). Education, globalization and the nation state. New York: St. Martin's Press.
17. Harré, R., & Slocum, N. (2003). Disputes as complex social events: On the uses of positioning theory. Common Knowledge, 9 (1), 100-118.
18. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21 (4), 394-407.
19. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20. MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham,UK: Open University Press.
21. Marginson, S. (1999). After globalization: Emerging politics of education. Journal of Education Policy, 14 (1), 19-31.
22. Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22 (1), 23-31.
23. Marginson, S. (2001, November). The global market in foreign higher education: The case of Australia. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Association for Studies in Higher Education, Virginia.
24. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281-309.
25. Ma Rhea, Z. (1997). Gift, commodity and mutual benefit: Analyzing the transfer of university knowledge between Thailand and Australia. Higher Education Policy, 10 (2), 111-120.
26. Meek, V. L. (2000). Diversity and marketisation of higher education: Incompatible concepts? Higher Education Policy, 13 (1), 23-39.
27. Neave, G. (2000). Diversity, differentiation and the market: The debate we never had but which we ought to have done. Higher Education Policy, 13, 7-21.
28. Osborne, M. (2002, November 20). Globalisation's toll on universities. The Age, p. 16-16.
29. Pratt, G., & Poole, D. (1999). Globalisation and Australian universities: Policies and impacts. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12 (6), 533-544.
30. Saffu, K. (2000). Contradictions in international tertiary strategic alliances: The case from down under. International Studies in Educational Administration: Journal of the Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management, 28 (2), 36-46.
31. Singh, M. G., & Gale, T. (1996). Restructuring teacher education, the national interest and globalisation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24 (1), 17-32.
32. Sklair, L. (2001). The transnational capitalist class and the discourse of globalization. Global Dimensions. Retrieved August 21, 2002, from http://www.globaldimensions.net/articles/sklair/Lsklair2.html
33. Spivak, G. C. (1996). The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayatri ChakravortySpivak. New York: Routledge.
34. Standish, P. (2002). Disciplining the profession: Subjects subject to procedure. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 14 (1), 5-24.
35. Trinh, M. H. (1991). When the moon waxes red: Representation, gender and cultural politics. New York: Routledge.
36. Usher, R. (2002). Putting space back on the map: Globalisation, place and identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34 (1), 41-55.
37. Welch, A. (2001). Globalisation, postmodernity and the state: Comparative education facing the third millennium. Comparative Education, 37 (4), 475-492.