Getting a word in edgeways? Patient group participation in the appraisal process of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence

Clinical Governance: An International Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 39-45

  Quennell, Pauline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical effectiveness; Groups; Patients expectations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 12244253026     PISSN: 14777274     EISSN: 17586038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14777270310459968     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Consumers’ Association (2001), National Institute for Clinical Excellence: A Patient-centred Inquiry, Consumers’ Association, London.
2. Department of Health (1999), Faster Access to Modern Treatment: How NICE Appraisals Will Work, Department of Health, London.
3. Department of Health (2000), The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment: A Plan for Reform, Cm4818, The Stationery Office, London.
4. Department of Health (2002), Cost-Effective Provision of Disease-Modifying Therapies for People with Multiple Sclerosis, HSC 2002/004, Department of Health, London.
5. Eaton, L. (2000), “A dose of scepticism”, Health Service Journal, 20 July, p. 12.
6. Edelman, M. (1971), Politics as Symbolic Action, Free Press, New York, NY.
7. Harrison, S. (2002), “New Labour, modernisation, and the medical labour process”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 465-85.
8. Harrison, S., Dowswell, G. and Milewa, T. (2002), “Public and user ‘involvement’ in the UK National Health Service”, Health and Social Care in the Community, Vol. 10 No. 19, pp. 1-4.
9. Hogg, C. (1999), Patients, Power and Politics, Sage, London.
10. Kendrick, S. (2001), “Using all the evidence: towards a truly intelligent National Health Service”, Health Bulletin, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 71-6.
11. NHS Management Executive (1992), Local Voices: The Views of Local People in Purchasing for Health, HMSO, London.
12. NICE (2001a), Guidance for Patient/Carer Groups on Making a Submission to a Technology Appraisal, NICE, London.
13. NICE (2001b), Appraisal of Beta Interferon and Glatiramer Acetate for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Final Appraisal Determination, NICE, London.
14. NICE (2002), Supplementary Submission to the House of Commons Health Select Committee (Papers 1 and 2), NICE, London.
15. Quennell, P. (2001), “Getting their say or getting their way? Has participation strengthened patient ‘voice’ in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence?”, Journal of Medical Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 202-19.
16. Raftery, J. (2001), “NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 323, pp. 1300-3.
17. Sackett, D., Straus, S., Richardson, W., Rosenberg, W. and Haynes, R. (2000), Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practise and Teach EBM (2nd ed.), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
18. White, M. (2000), “Consumerism and community participation: a reassessment of process, impact and value”, in Albrecht, G., Fitzpatrick, R. and Scrimshaw, S. (Eds), Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine, Sage, London.