Can public housing authorities attract and hold upwardly mobile households? A report from Cincinnati

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 23, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 431-450

  Varady, David P ^a   Wang, Xin Hao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035538733     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0735-2166.00098     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority. (1998). Changing the face of CMHA: Annual report 1998. Cincinnati, Ohio: CMHA.
2. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority. (2000). Ceiling rent/flat rent schedule. Cincinnati, Ohio: CMHA.
3. Davis, C., & Denton, M. (1987). The development of a tenant satisfaction survey. Toronto: Social Data Research Ltd.
4. Eaton, L. (2000, April 9). A city where the living, and the leaving, is easy. New York Times, 21.
5. Freeman, L. (1998). Interpreting the dynamics of public housing: Cultural and rational choice explanations. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 323-54.
6. Galster, G. C. (1987). Homeowners and neighborhood investment. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
7. Holloway, L. (2000, May 25). As poverty shifts students, getting lessons to stick proves a tough task. New York Times, A29.
8. Husock, H. (2000). How Charlotte is revolutionizing public housing. City Journal, 10(2), 52-59.
9. Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31(2), 249-270.
10. McWhirter, C. (1996, April 16). CMHA making strides. Cincinnati Enquirer, B1, B5.
11. Newman, S. J., & Duncan, G. J. (1979). Residential problems, dissatisfaction and mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(2), 154-166.
12. Speare, A. Jr., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. ( 1974). Residential mobility, migration and metropolitan change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
13. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmert. (No date). Building communities and new markets for the new century: 1998 consolidated report. Washington, DC: HUD.
14. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). A house in order: Results from the first national assessment of HUD housing, Washington, DC: HUD.
15. Vale, L. J. (1998). Public housing redevelopment: Seven kinds of success. In D. P. Varady, W. F. E. Preiser, & F. P. Russell (Eds.), New directions in urban public housing. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
16. Vale, L. J. (1997). Empathological places: Residents' ambivalence toward remaining in public housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(3), 159-76.
17. Vale, L. J. (2000). From the Puritans to the projects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Van Ryzin, G. G. (1996). The impact of resident management on residents' satisfaction with public housing. Evaluation Review, 20(4), 485-506.
19. Varady, D. P. (1980). Housing problems and mobility plans among the elderly. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 301-14.
20. Varady, D. P. (1983). Determinants of residential mobility decisions: The role of government services in relation to other factors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(2), 184-99.
21. Varady, D. P. (1986). Neighborhood upgrading: A realistic assessment. Albany, New York: State University of New York.
22. Varady, D. P., & Raffel, J. A. (1995). Selling cities: Attracting homebuyers through schools and housing programs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23. Vischer, J. C. (1991, May/June). Communicating through surveys. Journal of Property Management, 36-39.