Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of class II restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 305-310

  Loomans, Bas A C ^a   Opdam, Niek J M ^a   Roeters, Joost F M ^a   Bronkhorst, Ewald M ^a   Plasschaert, Alphons J M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Class II composite resin restoration; Matrix system; Proximal contact; Separation ring

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; CLEARFIL PHOTO BOND; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC CERAM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MATRIX BANDS; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33750420613     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation composite flowable composites. JADA 1998;129:567-577.
2. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
3. Dörfer CE, Steinhausen J, Staehle HJ. Messung approximaler Kontaktstärken von Komposit- und Amalgamfüllungen im Seitenzahnbereich in vitro (English abstract available). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:335-338.
4. Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy, ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strenghts. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:368-377.
5. Eberhard J, Dörfer CE, Staehle HJ. Einfluss der Inserttechnik auf approximale Kontaktstärken bei Kopositrestaurationen in vitro (English abstract available). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:184-186.
6. El-Bradawy WA, Leung BW, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Rubo MH. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:162-167.
7. Klein F, Keller AK, Staehle HJ, Dörfer CE. Proximal contact formation with different restorative materials and techniques. Am J Dent 2002;15:232-235.
8. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift jr. EJ. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:234-249.
9. Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of light cured composites. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:304-314.
10. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. J Dent 2006;34:292-297.
11. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 2006 (in press).
12. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder KF. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. JADA 2001;132:1099-1104.
13. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001;17:533-541.
14. Stavridakis MM, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent 2005;30:118-128.