Issues in software engineering of relevance to instructional design

TechTrends

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 28-35

  Douglas, Ian ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750401645     PISSN: 87563894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-006-0035-z     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2002). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/2002/P478.pdf
2. Advanced Distributed Learning. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.adlnet.org/
3. Agile Alliance. (2001). The agile manifesto. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.agilemanifesto.org/
4. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
6. Booch, G. (1999). UML in action. Communications of the ACM, 44(10), 26-28.
7. Bostok, S. (1998). Courseware engineering: An overview of the course development process. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.keele.ac.uk/ depts/cs/Stephen_Bostock/docs/atceng.htm
8. Fowler, M. (2000, December). Put processes on a diet. Software Development Online. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.sdmagazine.com/ documents/s=737/sdm0012a/
9. Goodyear, P. (1995). Infrastructure for courseware engineering. In R.D. Tennyson & A. E. Barron (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 11-31). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools. In S. Dijkstra, N.Seel, F. Schott & D. Tennyson, (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2) (pp. 83-111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42-56.
12. IBM Rational Software. (2005). New to Rational. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www-128.ibm.com/developer-works/rational/newto/
13. IMS global learning consortium. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/
14. Nandigam, J. Lakhotia, A. & Cech C., (1999). Experimental evaluation of agreement between programmers in applying the rules of cohesion. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 11, 35-53.
15. Open Source Initiative. (2005). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.open-source.org/
16. Paulk, C. V., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., & Chrissis, M. B. (1995). The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Pedagogical Patterns Project. (2005). Retrieved January 22,2006, from http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/current/right.html
18. Pressman, R. S. (2000). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1997). Automating instructional design. In S. Dijkstra, N.Seel, F. Schott & Tennyson, D. (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2) (pp. 59-81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Standish Group International. (1999). CHA-OS: A recipe for success. Research report. West Yarmouth, Massachusetts. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/chaos199%9.pdf
21. Wilson, B., Jonassen, D., & Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 21.1-21.22). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Yourdon, E., & Constantine, L. (1979). Structured design: fundamentals of a discipline of computer program and systems design. Englewood