Automating instructional design

Instructional Design: International Perspectives: Volume 2: Solving Instructional Design Problems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 59-81

  Michael Spector, J ^a   Muraida, Daniel J ^b  

^a Armstrong Laboratory Technical Training Research Division Instructional Design Branch   (United States)

^b Brooks AFB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071531632     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315044743-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Ahmad, A. (1989). Evaluadng appropriate technology for development: Before and after. Evaluation Review 13(3), 310-319.
2. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instrucdonal design. Journal of Instructional Development 3(4), 2-16.
3. B0dker, S. (1989). A human acdvity approach to user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(3), 171-196.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Nye, N. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 173-205). Alexandria, VA: Associadon for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Canfield, A. M., & Spector, J. M. (1991). A pilot study of the naming transaction shell (AL-TP-1991-006). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
6. Chin, K., Lamb, T. A., amp; Bennett, W. R. (1992). Introduction to training decisions modelling technologies: The training decisions system (AL-TP-1992-0014). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
7. Duchastel, P. C. (1990). Cognitive designs for instrucdonal design. Instructional Science, 19(6) 437-444.
8. Friedman, A. (1993). Designing graphics to support mental models. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, amp; D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues (pp. 249-292). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educadonal Technology.
9. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Gagné, R. M. (1992). Tryout of an organizing strategy for lesson design: Maintenance procedure with checklist (AL-TP-1992-0016). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
11. Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 38(1), 23-30.
12. Gagné, R. M., Tennyson, R. D., & Gettman, D. J. (1991). Designing an advanced instructional design advisor: Conceptual frameworks (AL-TP-1991-0017-Vol-5). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
13. Golas, K. C, & Shriver, S. (1991). Revision of the Air Force instructional systems development process: Baseline analysis report (Contract No. F42650-87-D-0026). Randolph AFB, TX: Air Training Command/XPCR.
14. Halff, H. M. (1993). Prospects for automadng instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, amp; D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues (pp. 67-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educadonal Technology.
15. Hall, E. M., Gott, S. P., & Pokorny, R. A. (in press). A procedural guide to cognitive task analysis: The PARI methodology (AL-TP-1992-xxxx). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
16. Hamm, R. M. (1988). Moment by moment variation in expert’s analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18(5), 757-776.
17. Hickey, A. E., Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1991). Design specifications for the advanced instructional design advisor (AIDA) (AL-TR-1991-0085). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
18. Kageff, L. L., & Roberts, E.J. (1989). TIPS: An expert system with the user in mind [Ford Aerospace internal document]
19. Kieras, D. E., Poison, P. G. (1985). An approach to the formal analyser of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 22, 365-394.
20. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research 61(2), 179-211.
21. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990). The second generation instructional design research program. Educational Technology, 30(88), 26-31.
22. Muraida, D.J. (1994). Evaluating an instructional development system. In R. D. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. Brussels, Belgium: Springer¬Verlag.
23. Muraida, D. J., Spector, J. M., O’Neil, H. F., & Marlino, M. R. (1993). Evaluation issues in automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, amp; D.J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues (pp. 293-321). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
24. Nelson, W. A., Magliaro, S., amp; Sherman, T. M. (1988). The intellectual content of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 11(1), 29-35.
25. Perez, R. S., amp; Neiderman, E. C. (1992). Modelling the expert training developer. In R.J. Seidel amp; P. Chatelier (Eds.), Advanced training technologies applied to training design (pp. 57-94). New York: Plenum.
26. Pirolli, P. (1989). On the art of building: Putting a new instructional design into practice. In H. Burns &J. Parlette (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Intelligent Tutoring Systems Forum (pp. 131-144). San Antonio, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
27. Pirolli, P., amp; Russell, D. M. (1990). The instructional design environment: Technology to support design problem solving. Instructional Science 19(2), 121-144.
28. Pressman, R. S. (1992). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Rich, E., amp; Knight, K K (1991). Artificial intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65-86.
31. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
32. Spector, J. M. (1990). Designing and developing an advanced instructional design advisor (AFHRL-TP-90-52). Brooks AFB, TX: Human Resources Laboratory, Technical Training Division.
33. Spector, J. M. (1993). Approaches to automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues (pp. 63-66). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
34. Spector, J. M., Gagné, R. M�? Muraida, D. J., & Dimitroff, W. A. (1992, April). Intelligent frameworks for instructional design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
35. Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1991a). Evaluating transaction theory. Education Technology, 37(10), 29-35.
36. Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D.J. (1991b, March). When CBT speaks: Guidelines for incorporating audio. Paper presented at the annual CBT Conference and Exposition, Orlando, FL.
37. Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1992, November). An intelligent framework for the creation of effective computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Norfolk, VA.
38. Spector, J. M., Muraida, D. J., & Dallman, B. E. (1990). Establishing instructional strategies for advanced interactive technologies. In Proceedings of the Psychology in the DoD Symposium (USAFA-TR-90-1). USAFA, CO: USAF Academy, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership.
39. Stephenson, S. D. (1992). The effects of student-instructor interaction on achievement in a dyad computer-based training environment (AL-TP-1992-0005). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
40. Tennyson, R. D. (1991). Framework specifications for an instructional systems development expert system. In R. M. Gagné, R. D. Tennyson, & D. J. Gettman, Designing an advanced instructional design advisor: Conceptual frameworks (AL-TP-1991-0017-Vol-5) (pp. 17-58). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
41. Tennyson, R. D. (1993). A framework for automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues (pp. 191-212). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
42. Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1992, April). The practice of instructional design: A survey of what designers do, don’t do, and why they don’t do it. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, San Francisco.
43. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Krammer, H. P. M., & Maaswinkel, R. M. (1994). Automating the planning and construction of programming assignments for teaching introductory computer programming. In R. D. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. Brussels, Belgium: Springer-Verlag.
44. Wipond, K., & Jones, M. (1990). Curriculum and knowledge representation in a knowledge-based system for curriculum development. Educational Technology, 30(3), 7-14.