The mathematics content knowledge role in developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge

Journal of Research in Childhood Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 102-118

  Capraro, Robert M ^a   Capraro, Mary Margaret ^a   Parker, Dawn ^a   Kulm, Gerald ^a   Raulerson, Tammy ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750388967     PISSN: 02568543     EISSN: 21502641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02568540509594555     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ball, D. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 500-508.
2. Ball, D. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241-247.
3. Ball, D., &Wilson, S. (1990, April). Knowing the subject and learning to teach it: Examining assumptions about becoming a mathematics teacher. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Research Association, Boston, MA.
4. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., &Lamb, C. E. (2001, October). Digital video: Watch me do what I say! Paper presented at Fall Teacher Education Conference of the Consortium of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education, Corpus Christi, TX.
5. Carpenter, T P, &Lehrer, R (1999) Teaching and learning with understanding In E Fennema &T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp.33-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 87-103.
7. Feinman-Nemser, S., &Buchmann, M. (1986). Pitfalls of experience in teacher education. In J. Raths &L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 61-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Fuller, R. (1997). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics. MidWestern Educational Researcher, 10(2), 9-16.
9. Ginsburg, H. D., Lopez, L. S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Yamamoto, T., Willis, T. M., &Kelly, M. J. (1992). Assessing understandings of arithmetic In R Lesh &S Lamon (Eds), Assessment ofauthentic performance in school mathematics (pp.265-289). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10. Hadfield, O. D., Littleton, C. E., Steiner, R. L., &Woods, E S (1998) Predictors of preservice elementary teacher effectiveness in the microteaching of mathematics lessons. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 34-46.
11. Harrington, H L (1995) Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-214.
12. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., &Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics Washington, DC: National Academy Press
13. Kulm, G, Capraro, R M, Capraro, M M, Burghardt, R., &Ford, K. (2001, April). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding in an era of accountability and high-stakes testing Paper presented at the research presession of the 79th annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Orlando, FL
14. Leinhardt, G, Putnam, R T, Stein, M T, &Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters In J E Brophy (Ed), Advances in research on teaching: Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (Vol. 2, pp 87-113) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
15. Lloyd, G, &Frykholm, J (2000) How innovative middle school mathematics can change prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions. Education, 120, 575-580.
16. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Merseth, K K (1996) Cases and case methods in teacher education In T J Buttery &E Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp 722-744) New York: Macmillan
18. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (1996) What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989) Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991) Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author
22. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing and learning mathematics for teaching. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
23. Onslow, B., Beynon, C., &Geddis, A. (1992). Developing a teaching style: A dilemma for student teachers The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 4, 301-315.
24. Program for International Student Assessment PISA items. Retrieved on January 17, 2001, from www.pisa.oecd.org
25. Quinn, R. (1997). Effects of mathematics methods courses on the mathematical attitudes and content knowledge of preservice teachers The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 108-113.
26. Romberg, T, &Carpenter, T (1986) Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), The third handbook of research on teaching (pp.850-873). New York: Macmillan.
27. Schwartz, J. E., &Riedsel, C. A. (1994, February). The relationship between teachers’ knowledge and beliefs and the teaching of elementary mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of College for Teacher Education, Chicago, IL (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED366585)
28. Secada, W. G., &Berman, P. W. (1999). Equity as a value-added dimension in teaching for understanding in school mathematics In E Fennema &T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp 76-94) Mah-wah, NJ: Erlbaum
29. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth and teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
30. Texas Statewide Systemic Initiative. (1998). Guidelines for the mathematical preparation of prospective elementary teachers. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center for Mathematics and Science Education
31. Thompson, B, &Borrello, G M (1985) The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203-209.