Where do firms choose to locate their R&D? A spatial conditional logit analysis on french data

European Planning Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1187-1208

  Autant Bernard, Corinne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; LOCATION DECISION; LOGIT ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33750362089     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654310600933314     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Anselin, L. (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics International Regional Science Review, 26(2), pp. 153-166. Special Issue
2. Anselin, L. and Varga, A. and Acs, Z. (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp. 422-448.
3. Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (2005) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics: Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
4. Audretsch, D. and Vivarelli, M. (1994) Small firms and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 67, pp. 225-237.
5. Autant-Bernard, C. (2001) Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case Research Policy, 30, pp. 1069-1078.
6. Autant-Bernard, C. and Massard, N. (2003) Innovation and Local Externalities: Evidence and Ambiguities Drawn from the Geography of Innovation. Saint-Etienne. CREUSET Working Paper
7. Autant-Bernard, C. and Massard, N. (2004). Disparités locales dans la production d'innovations: L'incidence du choix des indicateurs. Paper presented at the Fourth Proximity Congress Marseille June 17-18. In [pp.].
8. Autant-Bernard, C. and Massard, N. (2005). Pecuniary and knowledge externalities as agglomeration forces: Empirical evidence from individual French data, "Knowledge and Regional Economic Development". Paper presented Barcelona June 9-11. In [pp.].
9. Baldwin, R. and Forsild, R. (2000) The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: Stabilising and de-stabilising integration Economica, 67, pp. 307-324.
10. Baldwin, R. and Martin, P. (2005) Agglomeration and regional growth. In Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics: Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
11. Baldwin, R. and Martin, P. and Ottaviano, G. (2001) Global economic divergence, trade and industrialisation: The geography of growth take-offs Journal of Economic Growth, 6, pp. 5-37.
12. Baldwin, R. and (2003) Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999) Public research and industrial innovations in Germany Research Policy, 28, pp. 397-422.
14. Beron, K. and Vijverberg, W. (2004) Probit in a spatial context: A Monte Carlo analysis. In Advances in Spatial Econometrics. (pp. 169-195). Berlin: Springer.
15. Bolduc, D. and Fortin, B. and Gordon, S. (1997) Multinomial probit estimation of spatially interdependent choices: An empirical comparison of two techniques International Regional Science Review, 20, pp. 77-101.
16. Bottazzi, L. and Peri, G. (2003) Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data European Economic Review, 47, pp. 687-710.
17. Case, A. (1992) Neighborhood influence and technological change Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, pp. 491-508.
18. Cockburn, I. and Henderson, R. (1998) Absorptive capacity, co-authoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2, pp. 157-181.
19. Coughlin, C. and Garrett, T. and Hernandez-Murillo, R. (2004) Spatial Probit and the Geographic Patterns of State Lotteries. The Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis.
20. Crozet, M. and Mayer, T. and Mucchielli, J.-L. (2003) How do firms agglomerate? A study of foreign direct investment in France Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, pp. 27-54.
21. Duranton, G. and Puga, D. (2005) From sectoral to functional urban specialisation Journal of Urban Economics, 57, pp. 343-370.
22. Devereux, M. and Griffith, R. and Simpson, H. (2003) Agglomeration, Regional Grants and Firm Location. IFS Working Paper
23. Englman, F. and Walz, U. (1995) Industrial centers and regional growth in the presence of local inputs Journal of Regional Science, 35(1), pp. 389-405.
24. Feldman, M. (1994) The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Fleming, M. (2004) Techniques for estimating spatially dependent discrete choice models. In Advances in Spatial Econometrics. (pp. 145-167). Berlin: Springer.
26. Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2003) Market potential and the location of Japanese firms in the European Union Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, pp. 959-972.
27. Holloway, G. and Shankar, B. and Rahman, S. (2002) Bayesian spatial probit estimation: A primer and an application to HYV rice adoption Agricultural Economics, 27, pp. 383-402.
28. Jaffe, A. (1989) Real effects of academic research The American Economic Review, 79, pp. 957-970.
29. Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 577-598.
30. Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (1994) The organization and geography of Japanese R&D: Results from a survey of Japanese electronics and biotechnology firms Research Policy, 23, pp. 305-323.
31. Le Gallo, J. (2002) Econométrie spatiale: l'autocorrélation spatiale dans les modèles de régression linéaires Economie et Prévision, 155, pp. 139-158.
32. Lesage, J. (1997) Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models International Regional Science Review, 20, pp. 113-129.
33. Lucas, R. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3-42.
34. Marsh, T. and Mittelhammer, R. and Huffaker, R. (2000) Probit with spatial correlation by field plot: Potato Leafroll virus net necrosis in potatoes Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 5, pp. 22-38.
35. Martin, P. and Ottaviano, G. (1999) Growing location: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth European Economic Review, 43, pp. 281-302.
36. Mayer, T. and Mucchielli, J.-L. (2004) Multinational Firms' Location and the New Economic Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
37. Murdoch, J. and Sandler, T. and Vijverberg, W. (2003) The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: A spatial probit analysis Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp. 337-362.
38. Nelson, G. and D Pinto, A. and Harris, V. and Stone, S. (2004) Land use and road improvements: A spatial perspective International Regional Science Review, 27, pp. 297-325.
39. Ottaviano, G. and Thisse, J. (2005) Agglomeration and economic geography. In Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics: Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
40. Rosenthal, S. and Strange, W. (2005) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics: Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
41. Varga, A. (1998) Local Academic Knowledge Spillovers and the Concentration of Economic Activity. In (pp. 28). West Virginia University. Research Paper 9803
42. Walz, U. (1996) Transport costs, intermediate goods, and localized growth Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(6), pp. 671-695.