Access and benefits: Assistive technology in audit literacy

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 114-125

  Silver Pacuilla, Heidi ^a  

^a AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750327184     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.50.2.4     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Brydon-Miller, M. (2001). Education, research, and action: Theory and methods of participatory action research. In D.L. Tolman & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 76-89). New York: New York University Press.
2. Cervero, R.M., & Wilson, A.L. (2001). At the heart of practice: The struggle for knowledge and power. In R.M. Cervero & A.L. Wilson (Eds.), Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp. 1-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Corely, M.A., & Taymans, J.M. (2002). Adults with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 3, pp. 44-83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Fingeret, H.A., & Drennon, C. (1997). Literacy for life: Adult learners, new practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Fink, R.P. (1998). Successful dyslexies: A constructivist study of passionate interest reading. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading (pp. 387-408). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
6. Fink, R.P. (2000). Gender, self-concept, and reading disabilities. Thalamus: Journal of the International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities, 18(1), 15-33.
7. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M.B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
8. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Hooper, S.R., & Olley, J.G. (1996). Psychological comorbidity in adults with learning disabilities. In N. Gregg, C. Hoy, & A.F. Gay (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities (pp. 162-183). New York: Guilford.
10. Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1998). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 179-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States (Position statement). Newark, DE: Author.
12. Kaufman, P., Alt, M.N., & Chapman, C.D. (2001). Executive summary of the statistical analysis report of dropout rates in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
13. Labbo, L.D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Theory and research into practice: Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
14. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
15. Levine, P., & Nourse, S.W. (1998). What follow-up studies say about postschool life for young men and women with learning disabilities: A critical look at the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 212-233.
16. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent & Adult literacy, 43, 448-461.
17. Marder, C., & D'Amico, R. (1992). How well are youth with disabilities really doing? A comparison of youth with disabilities and youth in general. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED369233; http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno= ED369233)
18. National Adult Literacy and Learning Disabilities Center. (1999). Bridges to practice: A research-based guide for literacy practitioners serving adults with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
19. Office of Special Education Programs. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2002/index.html
20. Padilla, R.V. (1993). Using dialogical research methods in group interviews. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 153-166). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Purcell-Gates, V. (1995). Other people's words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Purcell-Gates, V., Degener, S., Jacobson, E., & Soler, M. (2002). Impact of authentic adult literacy instruction on adult literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 70-92.
23. Raskind, M.H. (1998). Literacy for adults with learning disabilities through assistive technology. In S. Vogel & S. Reder (Eds.), Learning disabilities, literacy, and adult education (pp. 253-270). Baltimore: Brookes.
24. Reder, S. (1999). Adult literacy and postsecondary education students: Overlapping populations and learning trajectories. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), The annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved January 29, 2005, from http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ncsall/ann_rev/ vol1_4.html
25. Ryan, R., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
26. Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., & Escobar, M. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998-1002.
27. Sheehan-Holt, J.K., & Smith, M.C. (2000). Does basic skills education affect adults' literacy proficiencies and reading practices? Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 226-227.
28. Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2003). Speaking up and speaking out: Engaging women literacy learners with disabilities in participatory action research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(10). (UMINo. 3108953)
29. Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2004). Assistive technology and adult literacy: Bridging the gap for adults with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (NARIC Accession No. 015274)
30. Sum, A., Kirsch, I., & Taggart, R. (2002). The twin challenges of mediocrity and inequality: Literacy in the U.S. from an international perspective. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center of the Educational Testing Service.
31. Tyler, J.H., Murnane, R.J., & Willett, J.B. (2000). Cognitive skills matter in the labor market, even for school dropouts (Report No. 15). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
32. Viise, N.M., & Austin, O.F. (2005). Can adult low-skilled literacy learners assess and discuss their own spelling knowledge? Journal of Adolescent 6- Adult Literacy, 48, 412-414.
33. Vogel, S. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 44-52.
34. Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman, L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
35. Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., Gelderblom, G.J., & De Witte, L. (2003). Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and Disability, 15, 231-238.