메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 296-299

Program outcome data: What do we measure? What does it mean? How does it lead to improvement?

Author keywords

Multi trait multi method (MTMM); Outcomes; Program assessment; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750326883     PISSN: 10638628     EISSN: 15505154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00019514-200610000-00013     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (12)
  • 2
    • 33750297984 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Higher Learning Commission, Academic Quality Improvement Program. The Higher Learning Commission
    • The Higher Learning Commission, Academic Quality Improvement Program. Principles and Categories for Improving Academic Quality. The Higher Learning Commission; 2005.
    • (2005) Principles and Categories for Improving Academic Quality
  • 3
    • 1842821013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission. New York: National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission
    • National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission. Interpretive Guidelines for Standards and Criteria. New York: National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission; 1999.
    • (1999) Interpretive Guidelines for Standards and Criteria
  • 5
    • 85039242595 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Available at: Accessed May 30, 2006
    • WSCN. WSCN AQIP system portfolio. 2006. Available at: www.wscn.edu. Accessed May 30, 2006.
    • (2006) WSCN AQIP System Portfolio
  • 6
    • 33750311116 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • West Suburban College of Nursing. Eagle, Idaho: InterEd
    • West Suburban College of Nursing. Annual Integrated Nursing Report. Eagle, Idaho: InterEd; 2004.
    • (2004) Annual Integrated Nursing Report
  • 7
    • 33745482838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring critical thinking in graduate education: What do we know?
    • Seldomridge LA, Walsh CM. Measuring critical thinking in graduate education: what do we know? Nurse Educ. 31(3):132-137.
    • Nurse Educ , vol.31 , Issue.3 , pp. 132-137
    • Seldomridge, L.A.1    Walsh, C.M.2
  • 8
    • 0033094008 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nursing education for critical thinking: An integrative review
    • Adams BL. Nursing education for critical thinking: an integrative review. J Nurs Educ. 1999;38(3):111-119.
    • (1999) J Nurs Educ , vol.38 , Issue.3 , pp. 111-119
    • Adams, B.L.1
  • 9
    • 33750300390 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Graduate nurses: Critical thinkers or better decision makers?
    • Girot EA. Graduate nurses: critical thinkers or better decision makers? J Adv Nurs. 2001;43(6):569-577.
    • (2001) J Adv Nurs , vol.43 , Issue.6 , pp. 569-577
    • Girot, E.A.1
  • 10
    • 0035312206 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students: A longitudinal study
    • Beckie T, Lowry L, Barnett S. Assessing critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students: a longitudinal study. Holist Nurs Pract. 2001;15(3):27-34.
    • (2001) Holist Nurs Pract , vol.15 , Issue.3 , pp. 27-34
    • Beckie, T.1    Lowry, L.2    Barnett, S.3
  • 11
    • 0033124250 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breakthroughs in nursing education: Looking back, looking forward
    • McBride AB. Breakthroughs in nursing education: looking back, looking forward. Nurs Outlook. 1999;47(30):114-119.
    • (1999) Nurs Outlook , vol.47 , Issue.30 , pp. 114-119
    • McBride, A.B.1
  • 12
    • 0004045633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Pew Health Professions Commission. San Francisco, Calif: The Pew Health Professions Commission
    • O'Neil EN, The Pew Health Professions Commission. Recreating Health Professional Practice for a New Century. San Francisco, Calif: The Pew Health Professions Commission; 1998.
    • (1998) Recreating Health Professional Practice for a New Century
    • O'Neil, E.N.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.