Learning a ranking from pairwise preferences

Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 629-630

  Carterette, Ben ^a   Petkova, Desislava ^a  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Data fusion; Information retrieval

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; DATA STRUCTURES; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ALGORITHMS; DATA FUSION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DATA FUSION; MULTIPLE RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; PAIRWISE PREFERENCES; TRAINING DATA; VOTING ALGORITHM;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

DOCUMENT PREFERENCES; PAIRWISE PREFERENCES; VOTING ALGORITHM;

EID: 33750314747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1148170.1148289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. J. Aslam and M. Montague. Models for Metasearch. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 275-285, 2001.
2. B. Bartell, G. Cottrell, and R. Belew. Automatic Combination of Multiple Ranked Retrieval Systems. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 173-181, 1994.
3. E. Fox and J. Shaw. Combination of Multiple Searches. In Proceedings of TREC-2.
4. S. Keerthi and D. DeCoste. A Modified Finite Newton Method for Fast Solution of Large Scale Linear SVMs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, pages 341-362, Mar 2005.
5. R. Manmatha and H. Sever. A Formal Approach to Score Normalization for Metasearch. In Proceedings of HLT, pages 88-93, 2002.
6. D. Mease. A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins. The American Statistician, Nov 2003.