The Use of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Radiology:. A Systematic Review

Academic Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1394-1404

  Mathers, Sandra A ^a,b   Chesson, Rosemary A ^b   Proctor, Jill M ^a,b   McKenzie, Graham A ^b   Robertson, Elizabeth ^b  

^a ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

interventional radiology; outcome measurement; Patient centred outcome; patient defined outcome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DATA EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RADIOLOGY; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCREENING;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PERIODICALS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 33750305102     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Thornbury J.R., Fryback D.G., and Edwards W. Likelihood ratios as a measure of diagnostic usefulness of excretory urogram information. Radiology 141 (1975) 561-565
2. Fineberg H.V., Bauman R., and Sosman M. Computerized cranial tomography: Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA 238 (1977) 224-230
3. Banta H.D., and McNeil B.J. Evaluation of the CAT scanner and other diagnostic technologies. Health Care Manage Rev (1978) 7-19 winter
4. Mushlin A.I., Mooney C., Holloway R.E., et al. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with equivocal neurological symptoms. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 13 (1997) 21-34
5. Visser K., de Vries S.O., Kitslaar P.J.E.H.M., et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging work-up and treatment for patients with intermittent claudication in the Netherlands. Eur J Endovasc Surg 25 (2003) 213-223
6. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of health care. Millbank Memorial Fund Q 44 (1966) 166-206
7. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Volume 1: The Definition of Quality and Approach to Its Assessment (1980), Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan
8. Donabedian A. An Introduction to Quality Assessment in Health Care (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
9. Rapier C.M. An Introduction to Outcomes Research (1996), Brookwood Medical Publications, England
10. Wright J.G. Outcomes research: What to measure. World J Surg 23 (1999) 1224-1226
11. Kelson M.C. Consumer collaboration, patient defined outcomes, and the preparation of Cochrane reviews. Health Exp 2 (1999) 129-135
12. Sullivan M. The new subjective medicine: Taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. Soc Sci Med 56 (2003) 1595-1604
13. Blackmore C.C., Black W.C., Jarvik J.G., et al. A critical synopsis of the diagnostic and screening radiology outcomes literature. Acad Radiol 6 Suppl 1 (1999) S8-S18
14. Hunink M.G.M. Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology. Eur Radiol 6 (1996) 615-620
15. Laine C., and Davidoff F. Patient centered medicine: A professional evolution. JAMA 275 (1996) 152-156
16. Murphy E. How was it for you? Imaging technology and the patient experience. Synergy (1999) 4-5 July
17. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research of Effectiveness. CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report 4. York, England: York NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 1996.
18. Collins English Dictionary. 3rd edition (1995), HarperCollins, London
19. Acad Radiol 3 Suppl 1 (1996)
20. Acad Radiol 6 Suppl 1 (1999)
21. Schreiber M.H., Leonard M., and Rieniets C.Y. Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: Survey of patient preferences. Am J Radiol 165 (1995) 467-469
22. Hollingworth W., Dixon A.K., Todd C.J., et al. Self-reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 7 (1998) 369-375
23. Swingler G.H., Hussey G.D., and Zwarenstein M. RCT of clinical outcome after chest radiograph in ambulatory acute lower-respiratory infection in children. Lancet 9100 (1998) 404-408
24. Goldberg M.S., Mayo N.E., Levy A.R., et al. Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low level ionising radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Epidemiology 9 (1998) 271-278
25. Kerry S., Dundas D., Hilton S., et al. Routine referral for radiography of patients presenting with low back pain: Is patients' outcome influenced by GPs' referral for plain radiography?. Health Technol Assess 4 (2000)
26. Kendrick D., Miller P., Fielding K., et al. The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: A randomised (unblinded) controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 5 (2001) 30
27. Worthington-Kirsch R.L., Popky G.L., and Hutchins F.L. Uterine arterial embolization for the management of leiomyomas: Quality of life assessment and clinical response. Radiology 208 (1998) 625-629
28. Bosch J.L., van der Graaf Y., and Hunink M.G.M. Health-related quality of life after angioplasty and stent placement in patients with iliac artery occlusive disease: Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Circulation 99 (1999) 3155-3160
29. Roth A.R., Spies J.B., Walsh S.M., et al. Pain after uterine artery embolisation for leiomyomata: Can its severity be predicted and does severity predict outcome?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 (2000) 1047-1052
30. Woodcock R.J., Marx W.F., Johnson R.M., et al. Needle diameter in outpatient myelography: Rates of adverse effects and current practice trends. Neuroradiology 42 (2000) 371-374
31. Siskin G.P., Stainken B.F., Dowling K., et al. Outpatient uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic uterine fibroids: Experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 (2000) 305-311
32. Mueller P.R., Biswal S., Halpern E.F., et al. Interventional radiologic procedures: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure, and satisfaction with medication: A prospective study. Radiology 215 (2000) 684-688
33. Spies J.B., Spector A., Roth A.R., et al. Complications after uterine artery embolisation for leiomyomas. Obstet Gynaecol 100 (2002) 873-880
34. Watson G.M.T., and Walker W.J. Uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids in 114 women: Reduction in size of the fibroids and women's views of the success of the treatment. Br J Gynaecol 109 (2002) 129-135
35. Hodler J., Peck D., and Gilula L.A. Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: Predictive value of technical and patient related factors. Radiology 227 (2003) 662-668
36. Loeken K., Steine S., Sandvik L., et al. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography: Validity, reliability and discriminatory power. Med Care 35 (1997) 731-741
37. Novy D.M., Price M., Huynh P.T., et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: Correlates of anxiety. Acad Radiol 8 (2001) 467-472
38. Lindfors K.K., O'Connor J., and Parker R.A. False-positive screening mammograms: Effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress. Radiology 218 (2001) 247-253
39. Priyanath A., Feinglass J., Dolan N.C., et al. Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998. Am J Radiol 178 (2002) 451-456
40. Currence B.V., Pisano E.D., Earp J.A., et al. Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have psychosocial effects?. Acad Radiol 10 (2003) 1257-1266
41. Mackenzie R., Sims C., Owens R.G., et al. Patients perception of MRI. Clin Radiol 50 (1995) 137-143
42. Blanchard T.K., Bearcroft P.W., Dixon A.K., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging or arthrography of the shoulder: Which do patients prefer?. Br J Radiol 70 (1997) 86-790
43. Steine S. Will it hurt, doctor?. Factors predicting patients' experience of pain during double contrast examination of the colon. Br Med J 307 (1993) 100
44. Jarvik J.G., Deyo R.A., and Koepsell T.D. Screening magnetic resonance images versus plain films for low back pain: A randomised trial of effects of patient outcomes. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) S28-S31
45. Loken K., Steine S., and Laerum E. Patient satisfaction and quality of care at four diagnostic imaging procedures: Mammography, double-contrast barium enema, abdominal ultrasonography and vaginal ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 9 (1999) 1459-1463
46. Jarvik J.G., Hollingworth W., Brook M., et al. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging VS radiographs for patients with low back pain: A randomised controlled trial. JAMA 289 (2003) 2810-2818
47. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1083; 8:141-144.
48. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: A new facility for measurement of health related quality of life. Health Pol 16 (1990) 199-208
49. Speilbeger C.D., Gorsuch R.L., and Lushene R. Manual for State Trait Anxiety Inventory (1983), Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto
50. Ware J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
51. Zigmond A.S., and Snaith R.P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67 (1983) 361-370
52. Kendrick D., Fielding K., Bentley E., et al. Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ 322 (2001) 400-405
53. McNeil B.J. Prospects for outcomes research in radiology and health policy. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) S19-S20
54. Groner C. Outcomes studies: Quest continues for validation. Diagn Imaging 1997; summer.
55. Dixon A.K. Evidence-based diagnostic radiology. Lancet 350 (1997) 509-512
56. Greenhalgh J. The Role of User Outcomes within Diabetes Care. Outcome Briefing 16, Nuffield Institute of Health, University of Leeds 8 (1996) 10-16
57. Hlatky M.A. Patient preferences and clinical guidelines (editorial). JAMA 273 (1995) 1219-1220
58. Proceedings of UK Radiological Congress 2005. British Journal of Radiology, Congress Series, British Institute of Radiology.
59. Blaxter M. Consumers and Research in the NHS: An R&D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in NHS. London: Department of Health, 1995.
60. Medical Research Council. Good Practice in Research. Available from: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-good_research.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2006.
61. Alzheimers Society Quality Research in Dementia. Consumer Involvement. London: Alzheimers Society. Available from http://www.qrd.alzeimers.org.uk/consumers.htm. Accessed April 21, 2006.
62. The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology Patient Liaison Group. Available from http:/www.rcr.ac.uk/index.asp?PageID=503. Accessed May 25, 2006.
63. Revicki D.A., Yabroff K.R., and Shikiar R. Outcomes research in radiologic imaging: Identification of barriers and potential solutions. Acad Radiol 6 Suppl 1 (1999) S20-S28