Classification methods for random utility models with i.i.d. disturbances under the most probable alternative rule

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1778-1794

  Kalouptsidis, N ^a   Koutroumbas, K ^b   Psaraki, V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Discrete choice models; Logit model; Pattern recognition; Random utility model

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; VECTORS; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; LOGIT MODEL; RANDOM UTILITY MODEL;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 33750230198     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baltas G. A model for multiple brand choice. European Journal of Operational Research 154 (2004) 144-149
2. Benati S., and Hansen P. The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms. Journal of Operational Research 143 (2002) 518-530
3. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman R. Discrete Choice Analysis (1985), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Bhat, C.R., Castelar, S., 2001. A unified mixed logit framework for modelling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco bay area, Transportation Research, Part B.
5. Censor, Y., 2001. On sequential and parallel projection algorithms for feasibility and optimization (keynote paper). In: Censor, Y., Ding, M. (Eds.), Visualization and Optimization Techniques, SPIE Proceedings, vol. 4553, SPIE-the International Society for Optical Engineering, Belligham, Washington, USA, pp. 1-9.
6. Domencich T., and McFadden D. Urban Travel Demand (1975), North Holland, Amsterdam
7. Econometric Software Inc., 1998. Limdep User's Manual, version 7.0.
8. Erlander S. Efficiency of the logit model. Annals of Operations Research 82 (1998) 203-218
9. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. fifth ed. (2003), Prentice-Hall
10. Hensher D.A., and Greene W.H. Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: Alternative normalisations. Transportation Research Part B 36 (2002) 1-17
11. Hensher D.A., and Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation 30 (2003) 133-176
12. Kalouptsidis N. Signal Processing Systems: Theory and Design (1997), John Wiley, New York
13. Karmarkar N. A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373-395
14. Labonte G. On solving systems of linear inequalities with artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 8 (1997) 590-600
15. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications in Marketing, Transportation and Environmental Valuation (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Luenberger D.G. Linear and Nonlinear Programming (1984), Addison Wesley
17. Manrai A. Mathematical models of brand choice behavior. European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 1-17
18. Manski C.F. Maximum score estimation of the stochastic utility model of choice. Journal of Econometrics 3 (1975) 205-228
19. Manski C.F., and Thompson T.S. Operational characteristics of maximum score estimation. Journal of Econometrics 32 (1986) 85-108
20. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1973), Academic Press, New York 105-142
21. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A., Lundqvist L., Snickars F., and Weibull J. (Eds). Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (1978), North Holland, Amsterdam 75-96
22. McFadden, D., 2000. Disaggregate behavioral travel demand's RUM side, A 30-year Retrospective, International Association of Travel Behavior Analysts, Australia, July.
23. Mendenhall W., and Sincich T. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences (1995), Prentice Hall
24. Munizaga M.A., Heydecker B.G., and Ortuzar J.D. Representation of heteroskedasticity in discrete choice models. Transportation Research, Part B 34 (2000) 219-240
25. Nash S.G., and Sofer A. Linear and Nonlinear Programming (1996), McGraw-Hill
26. Ortuzar J., and Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport. second ed. (1996), John Wiley
27. Provencher B., and Bishop R.C. Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 (2004) 793-810
28. Seetharam P.B. Probabilistic versus random utility models of state dependence: An empirical comparison. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (2003) 87-96
29. Theodoridis S., and Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition (2003), Academic Press
30. Walker J., and Ben-Akiva M. Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences 43 (2002) 303-343
31. Wen C., and Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 627-641
32. Williams H.C.W.L., and Ortuzar J.de.D. Travel demand and response analysis-some integrated themes. Transportation Research, Part A 16 5-6 (1982) 345-362