Sampling saproxylic Coleoptera: Scale issues and the importance of behavior

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 478-487

  Saint Germain, Michel ^a,b   Buddle, Christopher M ^a,b   Drapeau, Pierre ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Host selection behavior; Primary attraction; Random attack; Saproxylic Coleoptera; Tree scale sampling

Indexed keywords

ATTRACTANT; BEETLE; CAPTURE METHOD; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DEFINITIVE HOST; HOST SELECTION; SAMPLING; SNAIL;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA;

EID: 33750213969     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-35.2.478     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allison, J. D., J. H. Borden, and S. J. Seybold. 2004. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology 14: 123-150.
2. Belmain, S. R., M.S.J. Simmons, and W. M. Blaney. 2002. Influence of odor from wood-decaying fungi on host selection behavior of deadwatch beetle, Xestobium rufovillosum. J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 741-754.
3. Berg, Å., B. Ehnström, L. Gustafsson, T. Hallingbäck, M. Jonsell, and J. Weslien. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
4. Berryman, A. A., and M. Ashraf. 1970. Effects of Abies grandis resin on the attack behavior and brood survival of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 102: 1229-1236.
5. Borden, J. H., L. C. Ryder, L. J. Chong, H. D. Pierce, B. D. Johnston, and A. C. Oehlschlager. 1987. Response of the mountain pine-beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to 5 semiochemicals in Br. Colombia lodgepole pine forests. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 118-128.
6. Brattli, J. G., J. Andersen, and A. C. Nilssen. 1998. Primary attraction and host tree selection in deciduous and conifer-living Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae and Lymexylidae. J. Appl. Entomol. 122: 345-352.
7. Buddle, C. M., J. Beguin, E. Bolduc, A. Mercado, T. E. Sackett, R. D. Selby, H. Varady-Szabo, and R. M. Zeran. 2005. The importance and use of taxon sampling curves for comparative biodiversity research with forest arthropod assemblages. Can. Entomol. 137: 120-127.
8. Byers, J.A. 1995. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles. In R. T. Cardé and W. J. Bell (eds.), Chemical ecology of insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.
9. Chénier, J.V.R., and B.J.R. Philogène. 1989a. Field responses of certain forest Coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1729-1745.
10. Chénier, J.V.R., and B.J.R. Philogène. 1989b. Evaluation of three trap designs for the capture of conifer-feeding beetles and other forest Coleoptera. Can. Entomol. 121: 159-168.
11. Dajoz, R. 2000. Insects and forests: the role and diversity of insects in the forest environment. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France.
12. Drapeau, P., A. Leduc, J. F. Giroux, J.P.L. Savard, Y. Bergeron, and W. L. Vickery. 2000. Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 423-444.
13. Dufrêne, M., and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345-366.
14. Eilersten, O., O. R. Rune, O. Tonje, and P. Oddvar. 1990. Data manipulation and gradient length estimation in DCA ordination. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 261-270.
15. Fletchmann, C.A.H., M. J. Dalusky, and C. W. Berisford. 1999. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) responses to volatiles from aging loblolly pine billets. Environ. Entomol. 28: 638-648.
16. Goeden, R. D., and D. M. Norris. 1964. Attraction of Scolytus quadrispinosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to Carya spp. for oviposition. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57: 141-146.
17. Grohmann, C., U. Irmler, and R. Noetzold. 2004. The saproxylic beetle fauna (Coleoptera) of forests with different age and size. Mitteilungen Deutsch Gesellschaft Allgemeine Angewandte Entomol. 14: 307-310.
18. Grove, S. J. 2002a. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 1-23.
19. Grove, S. J. 2002b. The influence of forest management history on the integrity of the saproxylic beetle fauna in an Australian lowland tropical rainforest. Biol. Conserv. 104: 149-171.
20. Grove, S. J., and N. E. Stork. 1999. The conservation of saproxylic insects in tropical forests: a research agenda. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 67-74.
21. Haack, R. A., and F. Slansky. 1987. Nutritional ecology of wood-feeding Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera, pp. 449-486. In F. Slansky and J. G. Rodriguez (eds.), Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. John Wiley, New York.
22. Hammond, H.E.J., D. W. Langor, and J. R. Spence. 2001. Early colonization of Populus wood by saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera). Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1175-1183.
23. Hammond, H.E.J., D. W. Langor, and J. R. Spence. 2003. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) using Populus in boreal aspen stands of western Canada: spatiotemporal variation and conservation of assemblages. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1-19.
24. Hanks, L. M. 1999. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid larvae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 483-505.
25. Heliövaara, K., and R. Väisänen. 1984. Effects of modern forestry on north-western European forest invertebrates: a synthesis. Acta For. Fenn. 189: 1-32.
26. Hill, M. O., and H. G. Gauch, Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
27. Hövemeyer, K., and J. Schauermann. 2003. Succession of Diptera on dead beech wood: a 10-year study. Pedobiologia 47: 61-75.
28. Huber, D.P.W., H. Gries, J. H. Borden, and H. D. Pierce. 2000. A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology 10: 103-113.
29. Huber, D.P.W., and J. H. Borden. 2001. Angiosperm bark volatiles disrupt response of Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, to attractant-baited traps. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 217-233.
30. Jonsell, M., and J. Weslien. 2003. Felled or standing retained wood - it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For. Ecol. Manag. 175: 425-435.
31. Jonsell, M., K. Nittérus, and K. Stighäll. 2004. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 118: 163-173.
32. Kaila, L., P. Martikainen, P. Punttila, and E. Yakovlev. 1994. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on dead birch trunks decayed by different polypore species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 97-107.
33. Kappes, H., and W. Topp. 2004. Emergence of Coleoptera from deadwood in a managed broadleaved forest in central Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 1905-1923.
34. Lindhe, A., and Å. Lindelöw. 2004. Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. For. Ecol. Manag. 203: 1-20.
35. Macias-Samano, J. E., J. H. Borden, R. Gries, H. D. Pierce, G. Gries, and G.G.S. King. 1998. Primary attraction of the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis. J. Chem. Ecol. 24: 1049-1075.
36. Martikainen, P. 2001. Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecol. Bull. 49: 205-218.
37. Martikainen, P., L. Kaila, and Y. Haila. 1998. Threatened beetles in white-backed woodpecker habitats. Conserv. Biol. 12: 293-301.
38. Martikainen, P., J. Siitonen, P. Punttila, L. Kaila, and J. Rauh. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 94: 199-209.
39. Maeto, K., S. Sato, and H. Miyata. 2002. Species diversity of longicorn beetles in humid warm-temperate forests: the impact of forest management practices on old-growth forest species in southwestern Japan. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 1919-1937.
40. Moeck, H. A., D. L. Wood, and K. Q. Lindahl, Jr. 1981. Host selection behavior of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa, with special emphasis on the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 49-83.
41. Morewood, W. D., K. E. Simmonds, R. Gries, J. D. Allison, and J. H. Borden. 2003. Disruption by conophthorin of the kairomonal response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 2115-2129.
42. Mustaparta, H., M. E. Angst, and G. N. Lanier. 1979. Specialization of olfactory cells to insect- and host-produced volatiles in the bark beetle Ips pini (Say). J. Chem. Ecol. 5: 109-123.
43. Økland, P. 1996. A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. Eur. J. Entomol. 93: 195-209.
44. Pajares, J. A., F. Ibeas, J. J. Diez, and D. Gallego. 2004. Attractive response by Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae) to host and bark beetle semiochemicals. J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 633-638.
45. Person, H. J. 1931. Theory in explanation of the selection of certain trees by the western pine beetle. J. Forestry 29: 696-699.
46. Rainius, T., and N. Jansson. 2000. The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol. Conserv. 95: 85-94.
47. Rainius, T., and N. Jansson. 2002. A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 1759-1771.
48. Saint-Germain, M., P. Drapeau, and C. Hébert. 2004a. Comparison of Coleoptera assemblages from a recently burned and unburned black spruce forests of northeastern North America. Biol. Conserv. 118: 583-592.
49. Saint-Germain, M., P. Drapeau, and C. Hébert. 2004b. Xylophagous insect species composition and patterns of substratum use on fire-killed black spruce in central Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 677-685.
50. Schroeder, L. M. 1987. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda to Scots pine trees in relation to tree vigor and attack density. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 44: 53-58.
51. Shepherd, W. P., and R. A. Goyer. 2003. Seasonal abundance, arrival and emergence patterns of predaceous hister beetles (Coleoptera: Histeridae) associated with Ips engraver beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Louisiana. J. Entomol. Sci. 38: 612-620.
52. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
53. Similä, M., J. Kouki, and P. Martikainen. 2003. Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters. For. Ecol. Manag. 174: 365-381.
54. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. Ordination. In R. H. Jongman, C.J.F. ter Braak, and O.F.R. van Tongeren (eds.), Data analysis in community ecology Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
55. Tunset, K., A. C. Nilssen, and J. Andersen. 1993. Primary attraction in host recognition of coniferous bark beetles and bark weevils (Col., Scolytidae and Curculionidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 115: 155-169.
56. Wood, D. L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: 411-446.
57. Zhang, Q. H., and F. Schlyter. 2004. Olfactory recognition and behavioral avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agr. Forest Entomol. 6: 1-19.