Modularity of action programs in normal and down syndrome individuals;O Papel do conhecimento do nome das letras no início da aprendizagem da leitura: Evidência de indivíduos com síndrome de down

Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 53-59

  Cardoso Martins, Cláudia ^a   Michalick, Mirelle França ^a   Pollo, Tatiana Cury ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Down syndrome; Letter name knowledge; Reading strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750209052     PISSN: 01027972     EISSN: 16787153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-79722006000100008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Buckley, S. (1985). Attaining basic educational skills: Reading, writing and number. In D. Lane & B. Stratford (Eds.), Current apporaches to Down's syndrome (pp.315-343). New York: Praeger Press.
2. Cardoso-Martins, C. (2001). The Reading Abilities of Beginning Readers of Brazilian Portuguese: Implications for a Theory of Reading Acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 289-317.
3. Cardoso-Martins, C. & Batista, A.C.E. (2005). O conhecimento do nome das letras e o desenvolvimento da escrita: Evidência de crianças falantes do português. Psicologia: Reflexão & Crt̂ica, 18, 330-336.
4. Cardoso-Martins, C., Pennington, B.F., & Moon, J. (2006). Reading components in Down Syndrome. (Manuscrito não-publicado)
5. Cardoso-Martins, C., Resende, S.M., & Rodrigues, L.A. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter-phoneme relations in words: evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 409-432.
6. Cardoso-Martins, C., Rodrigues, L.A., & Ehri, L.C. (2003). Place of environmental print in reading development: Evidence from nonliterate adults. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 335-355.
7. De Abreu, M. & Cardoso-Martins, C. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning reading acquisition in Portuguese: the role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 85-104.
8. Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Ehri, L. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In R. Stainthorp &.P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Psychological Aspects of Education: Current Trends Number 1. British Journal of Educational Psychology Series II.
10. Ehri, L. & Wilce, L. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
11. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp.301-330). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Gough, P. & Hillinger, M. (1980). Learning to read: an unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179-196.
13. Harm, M.W. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
14. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition. In G. Mackinnon & T. Waller (Eds.), Reading research. Advances in theory and practice (pp. 199-221). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Pennington, B.F., Moon, J., Edgin, J., Stedron, J., & Nadel, L. (2003). The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: Evidence for hippocampal dysfunctions. Child Development, 74, 75-93.
16. Pinheiro, A. & Keys, K. (1987). A word frequency count in Brazilian Portuguese. University of Dundee, Dundee. (Manuscrito não-publicado)
17. Seymour, P.H.K. & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 1-36.
18. Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., & Richmond-Welty, E.D. (1996). Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 505-514.