Institutional choice and the diffusion of policy paradigms: Brazil and the second wave of pension reform;Escolha institucional e a difusão dos paradigmas de polítical o Brasil e a segunda onda de reformas previdenciárias

Dados

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 169-206

  Melo, Marcus André ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Convergence; Institutions; Path dependency; Rational choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750186640     PISSN: 00115258     EISSN: 16784588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0011-52582004000100005     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ALMEIDA, Maria Hermínia T. de (1995), Pragmatism by Necessity: The Brazilian Path of Economic Reform. Trabalho apresentado no seminário The Challenge of Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking State/Society Relations. Rio de Janeiro, 4-6 de outubro.
2. _ e MOYA, Maurício. (1997), "A Reforma Negociada: O Congresso e a Política de Privatização". Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 12, no 34, pp. 119-133.
3. Anais do Seminário International da Reforma da Previdência, (1999), Brasília, MPAS.
4. BROOKS, Sarah e JAMES, Estelle. (1999), The Political Economy of Pension Reform. Trabalho apresentado no World Bank-HIID Workshop on Pension Systems in Crisis: Challenges and Options for Reform. Washington, D.C., 19-30 de junho.
5. CECHIN, José. (1996), "Previdência Complementar, Reforma e Poupança". O Estado de S. Paulo, 25 de setembro.
6. COLLIER, D. e MESSICK, R. (1979), "Pre-requisites versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption". American Political Science Review, vol. 69, no 4, pp. 1.299-1.315.
7. CVM - COMISSÃO DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS. (1994), Reestruturação da Previdência: Notas sobre os Custos de Transição. Rio de Janeiro. Manuscrite.
8. DEACON, Bob. (1997), Global Social Policy. London, Sage.
9. DIMAGGIO, Paul e POWELL, Walter. (1983), "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields". American Sociological Review, vol. 48, pp. 147-160.
10. DOLOWITZ, David e MARSH, David. (1996), "Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Literature on Policy Transfer". Political Studies, vol. 44, pp. 343-357.
11. ELENA, Jorge. (1998), External Assessments of the Reform in Brazil. Trabalho apresentado na conferência Public Sector Reform in Brazil. London, 23 de novembre.
12. FIGUEIREDO, Argelina e LIMONGI, Fernando. (1999), Executive e Legislative na Nova Ordem Constitutional. Rio de Janeiro, Fundação Getulio Vargas Editora.
13. GILL, Indermit. (1997), "Reforming Social Security: Lessons from International Experience and Lessons for Brazil". Economic Notes, no 18, World Bank, Country Department 1, Latin American Region.
14. GREEN-PEDERSEN, Christoffer e LINDBOM, Anders. (2002), Politics within Paths. The Trajectories of Danish and Swedish Pension Systems. Trabalho apresentado no ECPR Joint Workshop The Politics of Aging. Turim, 22-26 de março.
15. HAAS, Peter M. (1992), "Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination". International Organization (special issue on Epistemic Communities), vol. 46, no 1, pp. 1-35.
16. HAGGARD, Stephan e MCCUBBINS, Matthew (eds.). (2001), Presidents, Parliaments and Policy. New York, Cambridge University Press.
17. HALL, Peter, (1993), "Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking". Comparative Politics, vol. 25, pp. 275-296.
18. HOCHMAN, Gilberto. (1988), "Aprendixado e Difusão na Constituição de Políticas: A Previdência Social e seus Técnicos". Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 3, no 7, pp. 84-97.
19. HOLZMANN, Robert e STIGLITZ, Joseph (eds.). (2001), New Ideas about Old Age Security: Toward Sustainable Pension Systems in the21st Century. Washington, D.C., World Bank.
20. IKENBERRY, G. John. (1990), "The International Spread of Privatization Policies: Inducements, Learning, and 'Policy Bandwagoning'", in E. Suleiman e J. Waterbury (eds.), The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization. Boulder, CO, Westview.
21. JAMES, Estelle. (2000), New Systems for Old Age Security: Experiments, Evidence and Unanswered Questions. Trabalho apresentado no World Bank-HIID Workshop on Pension Systems in Crisis: Challenges and Options for Reform. Washington, D.C., 19-30 de julho.
22. KAY, Stephen J. (1999), "Unexpected Privatizations: Politics and Social Security Reform in the Southern Cone". Comparative Politics, vol. 31, no 4, pp. 403-422.
23. _. (2001), Politics, Economics and Pension Reforms in the Southern Cone. Trabalho apresentado na Social Security and Pension Reform Conference. México.
24. KNIGHT, Jack. (1992), Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
25. _. (1995), "Models, Interpretations, and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change", in J. Knight e I. Sened (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
26. LODGE, Martin. (2003), "Institutional Choice and Policy Transfer: Reforming British and German Railway Regulation". Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, vol. 13, no 4, pp. 159-178.
27. MADRID, Raul. (1997), The Politics of Social Security Privatisation. Trabalho apresentado no Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association. Guadalajara, México.
28. _. (2000), "Explaining the Wave of Pension Reforms around the World". International Social Science Journal, no 163, pp. 51-59.
29. _. (2002), "The Politics and Economics of Pension Privatisation in Latin America". Latin American Research Review, vol. 37, no 2, pp. 159-182.
30. MALLOY, James. (1979), The Politics of Social Security in Brazil. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
31. MARCH, James e OLSEN, Johan. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, Free Press.
32. MELO, Marcus André. (1997), "As Reformas Constitucionais e a Previdência Social (1993-1996)", in E. Diniz e S. de Azevedo (eds.), Reforma do Estado e Democracia no Brasil. Brasília, Editora da UnB.
33. _. (2000), Institutional Obstacles to Market Reforms: The Politics of Tax Reform in Brazil. Trabalho apresentado no 22nd International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Miami.
34. _. (2002a), Reformas Constitucionais no Brasil: Instituições Políticas e Processo Decisório. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Revan.
35. _. (2002b), "When Institutions Matter: A Comparison of the Politics of Administrative, Social Security and Tax Reforms", in B. Schneider e B. Heredia (eds.), Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. Miami, FL, North-South Center Press.
36. _ e COSTA, Nilson. (1994), "Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Ajuste Estrutural e Política Social: As Estratégias da OMS/OPAS e do Banco Mundial para a Atenção à Saúde". Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, no 11, pp. 49-109.
37. MESA-LAGO, Carmelo. (1996), "Las Reformas de las Pensiones en América Latina y la Posición de los Organismes Internacionales". Revista de la CEPAL, no 60, pp. 21-45.
38. _. (2001), "Structural Reform of Social Security Pensions in Latin America: Models, Characteristics, Results and Conclusions". International Social Security Review, vol. 54, no 4, pp. 67-92.
39. MILLER, Gary. (2000), "Rational Choice and Dysfunctional Institutions". Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, vol. 13, no 4, pp. 535-547.
40. MYLES, John e PIERSON, Paul. (2001), "The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform", in P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
41. NORTH, Douglas. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
42. NUNBERG, Barbara. (1999), "Leading the Horse to Water: Transnational Inducements in Administrative Reform", in J. Perry (ed.), Comparative Civil Service. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
43. OLIVEIRA, Francisco B., BELTRÃO, Kaizô e FERREIRA, Mônica G. (1997), "Reforma da Previdência". Texto para Discussão, no 508, IPEA, Brasília.
44. ORENSTEIN, Mitchell. (2003), Mapping the Diffusion of Pension Innovation. Syracuse University. Manuscrito.
45. ORSZAG, Peter R. e STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2001), "Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths about Social Security Systems", in R. Holzmann e J. Stiglitz (eds.), New Ideas about Old Age Security: Toward Sustainable Pension Systems in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C., World Bank.
46. PALIER, Bruno e BONOLI, Giuliano. (1999), "Phénomènes de Path Dependence et Ré formes des Systèmes de Protection Sociale". Revue Française de Science Politique, vol. 49, no 3, pp. 399-420.
47. PAPADOPULOS, Jorge. (2001), Politics and Ideas in Policy-making. Reforming Pension Systems in Comparative Perspective: The Cases of Uruguay and Chile. Trabalho apresentado no Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association. Washington, D.C.
48. PIERSON, Paul. (2000a), "The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change". Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, vol. 13, no 4, pp. 475-499.
49. _. (2000b), "Increasing Returns, Path Dependency and the Study of Politics". American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no 2, pp. 251-267.
50. _ e WEAVER, R. Kent. (1993), "Imposing Losses in Pension Policy", in R. K. Weaver e B. Rockman (eds.), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the US and Abroad. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution.
51. PINHEIRO, Vinicius C. (2001), "A Experiência Brasileira", in Anais do Seminário Regional sobre as Reformas dos Sistemas de Pensão na America Latina. Brasília, MPAS.
52. PUTNAM, Robert. (1993), "Diplomacy and Domestic Policy: The Logic of Two Level Games", in P. Evans, H. K. Jacobson e R. Putnam (eds.), Double Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Los Angeles, University of California Press.
53. SHEPSLE, Kenneth. (1989), "Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach". Journal of Theoretical Politics, no 2, pp. 131-147.
54. VÉLEZ, Claudio e FERREIRA, Francisco. (2002), Inequality and Economic Development. World Bank. Manuscrito.
55. WEAVER, R. Kent e ROCKMAN, Bert (eds.). (1993), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the US and Abroad. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution.
56. WORLD BANK. (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis. Washington, D.C.,World Bank.
57. _. (1995), "Brazil: Social Security and Private Pensions". Report, no 12.336, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
58. _. (2001a), "Brazil: Critical Issues in Social Security". World Bank Country Study, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
59. _. (2001b), "Enhancing Economic Reforms through Social Development: Brazil State Pension Systems Reform LIL". Note, no 52, março.