Stimulus salience and retrospective revaluation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 481-487

  Liljeholm, Mimi ^a   Balleine, Bernard W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioning; Extinction; Rats; Recovery from overshadowing; Reinforcement; Retrospective revaluation; Stimulus salience

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LONG EVANS RAT; MALE; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; VISION;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750174071     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.481     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baker, A. G., & Mercier, P. (1989). Attention, retrospective processing and cognitive representations. In S. Klein & R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories (pp. 85-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Balleine, B. W., Espinet, A., & Gonzalez, F. (2005). Perceptual learning enhances retrospective revaluation of conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 341-350.
3. Carr, A. F. (1974). Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 718-723.
4. Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 837-854.
5. Denniston, J. C., Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance as a determinant of cue competition. Psychological Science, 7, 325-331.
6. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49(B), 60-80.
7. Holland, P. C. (1999). Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: No recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52(B), 307-333.
8. Holland, P. C., & Forbes, D. T. (1982). Representation-mediated extinction of conditioned flavor aversions. Learning and Motivation, 13, 454-471.
9. Kaufman, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318-320.
10. Larkin, M. J. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Retrospective revaluation of causality judgments under positive and negative contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1331-1352.
11. Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186-192.
12. Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., & Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 16, 398-412.
13. McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
14. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Navarro, J. I., Hallam, S. C., Matzel, L. D., & Miller, R. R. (1989). Superconditioning and unovershadowing. Learning and Motivation, 20, 130-152.
16. Rauhut, R. S., McPhee, J. E., & Ayres, J. J. B. (1990). Blocked and overshadowed stimuli are weakened in their ability to serve as blockers and second-order reinforcers in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 267-275.
17. Rescorla, R. A., & Cunningham, C. L. (1978). Within-compound flavor associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 45-67.
18. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 37(B), 1-21.
19. Shevill, I., & Hall, G. (2004). Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57(B), 331-347.
20. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
21. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.