Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 331-347

  Shevill, Ian ^a   Hall, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 7544248495     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724990344000178     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bakeman, R., & McArthur, D. (1996). Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 584-589.
2. Blaisdell, A. P., Bristol, A. S., Gunther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 335-351.
3. Blaser, R. E., Couvillon, P. A., & Bitterman, M. E. (2004). Backward blocking in honeybees. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 349-360.
4. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
5. Hall, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 233-255.
6. Holland, P. C. (1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversion. Learning and Motivation, 12, 1-12.
7. Holland, P. C. (1990). Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action. Cognition, 37, 105-131.
8. Holland, P. C. (1999). Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: No recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 307-333.
9. Holland, P. C., & Forbes, D. T. (1982). Representation mediated extinction of conditioned flavour aversions. Learning and Motivation, 13, 454-471.
10. Holland, P. C., & Ross, R. T. (1981). Within-compound associations in serial compound conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 228-241.
11. Kaufman, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonornic Society, 18, 318-320.
12. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Larkin, M. J. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Retrospective revaluation under positive and negative contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1331-1352.
14. Matzel, L. D., Shuster, K., & Miller, R. R. (1987). Covariation in conditioned response strength between elements trained in compound. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 439-477.
15. Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Graham, N. J. (1992). Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of the cues present during training ofthat specific stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 251-264.
16. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego. CA: Academic Press.
17. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-75.
18. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
19. Rescorla, R. A., & Cunningham, C. L. (1978). Within-compound flavour associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 267-275.
20. Rescorla, R. A., & Wanner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
22. Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23-64). Mahwah, NJ: Eawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Ward-Robinson, J., & Hall, G. (1996). Backward sensory preconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 395-404.