Competition-dependent incompatibility in Phormium tenax: Does self-fertilisation provide reproductive assurance?

New Zealand Journal of Botany

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 249-259

  Jesson, Linley K ^a   Milicich, Lesley D ^a   Newman, Sarah C ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cryptic incompatibility; Inbreeding depression; Outcrossing rates; Phormium tenax; Reproductive assurance

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FRUIT SET; GEITONOGAMY; INCOMPATIBILITY; OUTCROSSING; PERENNIAL PLANT; POLLINATOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED SET;

AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND;

LINUM USITATISSIMUM; PHORMIUM TENAX;

EID: 33750173531     PISSN: 0028825X     EISSN: 11758643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0028825X.2006.9513022     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, HG. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after “long-distance” dispersal. Evolution, 9:347–348.
2. Barrett, SCH. 2002. Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity, 88:154–159.
3. Barrett, SCH, and Eckert, CG. 1990. “ Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. ”. In Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants, Edited by:Kawano, S. 229–254. Tokyo, Japan:Academic Press.
4. Bateman, AJ. 1956. Cryptic self-incompatibility in the wildflower:Cheiranthus cheiri L. Heredity, 10:257–261.
5. Becerra, JX, and Lloyd, DG. 1992. Competition dependent abortion of self-pollinated flowers of Phormium tenax (Agavaceae):a second action of self-incompatibility at the whole flower level?. Evolution, 46:458–469.
6. Bertin, RI, and Sullivan, M. 1988. Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campis radicans. American Journal of Botany, 75:1140–1147.
7. Bertin, RI, Barnes, C, and Guttman, SI. 1989. Self-sterility and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans (Bigno-niaceae). Botanical Gazette, 150:397–403.
8. Bowman, RN. 1987. Cryptic self-incompatibility and the breeding system of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany, 74:471–476.
9. Broyles, SD, and Wyatt, R. 1993. The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany, 80:41–44.
10. Charlesworth, D. 1989. Why do plants produce so many more ovules than seeds?. Nature, 338:21–22.
11. Charlesworth, D, and Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution, 44:870–888.
12. Craig, JL. 1989a. Seed set in Phormium—interactive effects of pollinator behavior, pollen carryover and pollen source. Oecologia, 81:1–5.
13. Craig, JL. 1989b. A differential response to self pollination—seed size in Phormium. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 27:583–586.
14. Craig, JL, and Stewart, AM. 1988. Reproductive biology of Phormium tenax:a honeyeater-pollinated species. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 26:453–463.
15. Darwin, C. 1877. The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects, 300London, UK:University of Chicago Press.
16. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms, 230Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
17. Eckert, CG. 2000. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology, 81:532–542.
18. Eckert, CG, and Allen, M. 1997. Cryptic self-incompatibility in tristylous Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). American Journal of Botany, 84:1391–1397.
19. Eckert, CG, and Barrett, SCH. 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae):population genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution, 48:952–964.
20. Glover, DE, and Barrett, SCH. 1987. Genetic variation in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity, 59:7–17.
21. Griffin, CAM, and Eckert, CG. 2003. Experimental analysis of biparental inbreeding in a self-fertilizing plant. Evolution, 57:1513–1519.
22. Harder, LD, and Barrett, SCH. 1996. “ Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal pollinated plants. ”. In Floral biology:studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, Edited by:Lloyd, DG, and Barrett, SCH. 140–190. New York, NY, USA:Chapman & Hall.
23. Harder, LD, Barrett, SCH, and Cole, WW. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 267:315–320.
24. Herlihy, CR, and Eckert, CG. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature, 416:320–323.
25. Herlihy, CR, and Eckert, CG. 2004. Experimental dissection of inbreeding and its adaptive significance in a flowering plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Evolution, 58:2693–2703.
26. Husband, BC, and Schemske, DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50:54–70.
27. Ihaka, R, and Gentleman, R. 1996. R:a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5:299–314.
28. Jain, SK. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 7:69–95.
29. Kalisz, S, and Vogler, DW. 2003. Benefits of autonomous self-ing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology, 84:2928–2942.
30. Kalisz, S, Vogler, DW, Fails, B, Finer, M, Shepard, E, Herman, T, and Gonzales, R. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany, 86:1239–1247.
31. Kalisz, S, Vogler, DW, and Hanley, KM. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature, 430:884–887.
32. Levin, DA. 1996. The evolutionary significance of pseudo self fertility. American Naturalist, 148:321–332.
33. Lloyd, DG. 1980. “ Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. ”. In Demography and evolution in plant populations, Edited by:Solbrig, OT. 67–88. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
34. Lloyd, DG. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153:370–380.
35. Lloyd, DG, and Schoen, DJ. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153:358–369.
36. Lloyd, DG, and Webb, CJ. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in Angiosperms. 1. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 24:135–162.
37. Morgan, MT, Wilson, WG, and Knight, TM. 2005. Plant population dynamics, pollinator foraging, and the selection of self-fertilization. American Naturalist, 166:169–183.
38. Müller, H. 1883. The fertilization of flowers, London, UK:Macmillan.
39. Pannell, JR, and Barrett, SCH. 1998. Baker's law revisited:reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution, 52:657–668.
40. Reusch, TBH. 2000. Pollination in the marine realm:microsatellites reveal high outcrossing rates and multiple paternity in eelgrass Zostera marina. Heredity, 85:459–464.
41. Ritland, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity, 81:235–237.
42. Schoen, DJ, and Brown, AHD. 1991. Whole- and part-flower self-pollination in Glycine clandestina and G. argyrea and the evolution of autogamy. Evolution, 45:1651–1664.
43. Snow, AA. 1982. Pollination intensity and potential seed set in Passiflora vitifolia. Oecologia, 55:231–237.
44. Snow, AA, Spira, TP, Simpson, R, and Klips, RA. 1996. “ The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. ”. In Floral biology. Studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, Edited by:Lloyd, DG, and Barrett, SCH. 191–216. New York, NY, USA:Chapman and Hall.
45. Thomson, JD, and Thomson, BA. 1989. Dispersal of Erythronium grandiflorum pollen by bumblebees:implications for gene flow and reproductive success. Evolution, 43:657–661.
46. Thomson, JD, Price, MV, Waser, NM, and Stratton, DA. 1986. Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visiting Erythronium grandiflorum. Oecologia, 69:561–566.
47. Tisch, PA. 1996. “ Masting:a test of pollination efficiency and predator satiation hypotheses ”. Christchurch, New Zealand:University of Canterbury. Unpublished MSc thesis
48. Venables, WN, and Ripley, BD. 1994. Modern applied statistics with S-plus, New York, NY, USA:Springer-Verlag.
49. Vogler, DW, and Kalisz, S. 2001. Sex among the flowers:the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution, 55:202–204.
50. Waser, NM, and Price, MV. 1983. “ Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. ”. In Handbook of experimental pollination biology, Edited by:Jones, CE, and Little, RJ. 341–359. New York:Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
51. Waser, NM, and Price, MV. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata:are ovules usurped?. American Journal of Botany, 78:1036–1043.
52. Webb, CJ, and Lloyd, DG. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 34:164–178.
53. Weller, SG, and Ornduff, R. 1977. Cryptic self-incompatibility in Amsinckia grandiflora. Evolution, 31:47–51.