Factors influencing territorial occupancy and reproductive output in the Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus

Ibis

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 807-819

  Martínez, José E ^a   Pagán, Iluminada ^a   Calvo, José F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FLEDGING; FOREST; HABITAT TYPE; RAPTOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; TERRITORY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

ACCIPITER GENTILIS; BUTEO BUTEO; HIERAAETUS PENNATUS;

EID: 33750163507     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: 1474919X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00586.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adams, E.S. 2001. Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 277-303.
2. Boughton, D.A. 2000. The dispersal system of a butterfly: a test of source-sink theory suggests the intermediate-scale hypothesis. Am. Nat. 156: 131-144.
3. Bourski, O.V. & Forstmeier, W. 2000. Does interspecific competition affect territorial distribution of birds? A long-term study on Siberian Phylloscopus warblers. Oikos 88: 341-350.
4. Bried, J. & Jouventin, P. 1999. Influence of breeding success on fidelity in long-lived birds: an experimental study. J. Avian Biol. 20: 392-398.
5. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
6. Cerasoli, M. & Penteriani, V. 1996. Nest-site and aerial meeting point selection by Common Buzzards (Buteo buteo) in central Italy. J. Raptor Res. 30: 130-135.
7. Donázar, J.A., Blanco, G., Hiraldo, F., Soto-Largo, E. & Oria, J. 2002. Effects of forestry and other land-use practices on the conservation of Cinereous Vultures. Ecol. Appl. 12: 1445-1456.
8. Donázar, J.A., Hiraldo, F. & Bustamante, J. 1993. Factors influencing nest sites selection, breeding density and breeding success in the bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus). J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 504-514.
9. Espie, R.H.M., James, P.C., Oliphant, L.W., Warkentin, I.J. & Lieske, D.J. 2004. Influence of nest-site and individual quality on breeding performance in Merlins Falco columbarius. Ibis 146: 623-631.
10. Espie, R.H.M., Oliphant, L.W., James, P.C., Warkentin, I.J. & Lieske, D.J. 2000. Age-dependent breeding performance in Merlins (Falco columbarius). Ecology 81: 3404-3415.
11. Fargallo, J.A., Blanco, G. & Soto-Largo, E. 1998. Forest management effects on nesting habitat selected by Eurasian Black Vultures (Aegypius monachus) in central Spain. J. Raptor Res. 32: 202-207.
12. Ferrer, M. & Bisson, I. 2003. Age and territory-quality effects on fecundity in the Spanish Imperial Eagle (Aquila adalberti ). Auk 120: 180-186.
13. Flynn, L., Nol, E. & Zharikov, Y. 1999. Philopatry, nest-site tenacity, and mate fidelity of Semipalmated Plovers. J. Avian Biol. 30: 47-55.
14. Forero, M.G., Donázar, J.A., Blas, J. & Hiraldo, F. 1999. Causes and consequences of territory change and breeding dispersal distance in the Black Kite. Ecology 80: 1298-1310.
15. Forslund, P. & Pärt, T. 1995. Age and reproduction in birds - hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 374-378.
16. Franklin, A.B., Anderson, D.R., Gutiérrez, R.J. & Burnham, K.P. 2000. Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in Northern Spotted Owl populations in northwestern California. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 539-590.
17. Fretwell, S.D. & Lucas, H.L. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19: 16-36.
18. Fuller, M.R. & Mosher, J.A. 1987. Raptor survey techniques. In Giron Pendleton, B.A., Millsap, B.A., Cline, K.W. & Bird, D.M. (eds) Raptor Management Techniques Manual: 37-65. Baltimore: National Wildlife Federation.
19. García-Dios, I. & Viñuela, J. 2000. Efectos de la gestión forestal sobre el éxito reproductor del Aguililla Calzada (Hieraaetus pennatus) en el valle del Tiétar. Ardeola 47: 183-190.
20. Gordon, D.M. 1997. The population consequences of territorial behaviour. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 63-66.
21. Greenwood, P.J. & Harvey, P.H. 1982. The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 1-21.
22. Hakkarainen, H., Mykrä, S., Kurki, S., Tornberg, R. & Jungell, S. 2004. Competitive interactions among raptors in boreal forests. Oecologia 141: 420-424.
23. Heath, M., Borggreve, C. & Peet, N. 2000. European Bird Populations. Estimates and Trends. Cambridge: BirdLife International.
24. Hoover, J.P. 2003. Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the Prothonotary Warbler. Ecology 84: 416-430.
25. del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 2. New World Vultures to Guinea-fowl. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
26. Johnson, J.B. & Omland, K.S. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 101-108.
27. Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118: 557-562.
28. Kostrzewa, A. 1991. Interspecific interference competition in three European raptor species. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3: 127-143.
29. Kostrzewa, A. 1996. A comparative study of nest-site occupancy and breeding performance as indicators for nesting habitat quality in three European raptor species. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8: 1-18.
30. Krüger, O. 2002. Analysis of nest occupancy and nest reproduction in two sympatric raptors: Common Buzzard Buteo buteo and Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis. Ecography 25: 523-532.
31. Krüger, O. 2004. The importance of competition, food, habitat, weather and phenotype for the reproduction of Buzzard Buteo buteo. Bird Study 51: 125-132.
32. Krüger, O. & Lindström, J. 2001a. Habitat heterogeneity affects population growth in northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 173-181.
33. Krüger, O. & Lindström, J. 2001b. Lifetime reproductive success in Common Buzzard Buteo buteo: from individual variation to population demography. Oikos 93: 260-273.
34. Maindonald, J. & Braun, J. 2002. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Martin, T.E. 1993. Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. Bioscience 43: 523-532.
36. Martin, T.E. 1998. Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79: 656-670.
37. Martínez, J.E. 2002. Ecología del Águila Calzada (Hieraaetus pennatus) en ambientes mediterráneos. Ph.D. Thesis. Murcia, Spain: University of Murcia.
38. Martínez, J.E. & Calvo, J.F. 2005. Prey partitioning between mates in breeding Booted Eagles (Hieraaetus pennatus). J. Raptor Res. 39: 159-163.
39. Martínez, J.E., Cremades, M., Pagán, I. & Calvo, J.F. 2004. Diet of Booted Eagles in southeastern Spain. In Chancellor, R.D. & Meyburg, B.-U. (eds) Raptors Worldwide: 593-599. Budapest: World Working Group on Birds of Prey & MMD/BirdLife Hungary.
40. McClaren, E.L., Kennedy, P.L. & Dewey, S.R. 2002. Do some Northern Goshawk nest areas consistently fledge more young than others? Condor 104: 343-352.
41. McCulloch, C.E. & Searle, S.R. 2000. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
42. Misenhelter, M.D. & Rotenberry, J.T. 2000. Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in Sage Sparrows. Ecology 81: 2892-2901.
43. Neteler, M. & Mitasova, H. 2002. Open Source GIS: a GRASS GIS Approach. Boston: Kluwer.
44. Newton, I. 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. Berkhamsted, UK: T. & A.D. Poyser.
45. Newton, I. & Marquiss, M. 1982. Fidelity to breeding area and mate in sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 327-341.
46. Nielsen, J.T. & Drachmann, J. 2003. Age-dependent reproductive performance in Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Ibis 145: 1-8.
47. Nilsson, I., Nilsson, S.G. & Sylvén, M. 1982. Diet choice, resource depression, and the regular nest spacing of birds of prey. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 18: 1-9.
48. Pagán, I., Martínez, J.E., Carrete, M. & Calvo, J.F. 2004. Nest occupancy patterns of Booted Eagles Hieraaetus pennatus in southeastern Spain. In Chancellor, R.D. & Meyburg, B.-U. (eds) Raptors Worldwide: 645-652. Budapest: World Working Group on Birds of Prey & MMD/BirdLife Hungary.
49. Penteriani, V. 2002. Northern Goshawk nesting habitat in Europe and North America: a review. Ornis Fenn. 79: 149-163.
50. Penteriani, V., Gallardo, M. & Roche, P. 2002. Landscape structure and food supply affect eagle owl (Bubo bubo) density and breeding performance: a case of intra-population heterogeneity. J. Zool., Lond. 257: 365-372.
51. Petit, L.J. & Petit, D.R. 1996. Factors governing habitat selection by Prothonotary Warblers: field tests of the Fretwell-Lucas models. Ecol. Monogr. 66: 367-387.
52. Petty, S.J. 1998. Ecology and Conservation of Raptors in Forests. London: Forestry Commission Bulletin 118, Stationery Office Books.
53. Rottenborn, S.C. 2000. Nest-site selection and reproductive success of urban Red-shouldered Hawks in central California. J. Raptor Res. 34: 18-25.
54. Roulin, A., Ducret, B., Ravussin, P.-A. & Altwegg, R. 2003. Female colour polymorphism covaries with reproductive strategies in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco. J. Avian Biol. 34: 393-401.
55. Sánchez-Zapata, J.A. & Calvo, J.F. 1999. Raptor distribution in relation to landscape composition in semi-arid Mediterranean habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 254-262.
56. Schmidt, K.A. 2004. Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence. Ecol. Lett. 7: 176-184.
57. Selås, V. 1997. Nest-site selection by four sympatric forest raptors in southern Norway. J. Raptor Res. 31: 16-25.
58. Sergio, F. & Bogliani, G. 2000. Hobby nest-site selection and productivity in relation to intensive agriculture and forestry. J. Wildl. Manage. 64: 637-646.
59. Sergio, F., Marchesi, L. & Pedrini, P. 2003a. Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 232-245.
60. Sergio, F., Marchesi, L. & Pedrini, P. 2004a. Integrating individual habitat choices and regional distribution of a biodiversity indicator and top predator. J. Biogeogr. 31: 619-628.
61. Sergio, F. & Newton, I. 2003. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 857-865.
62. Sergio, F., Pedrini, P. & Marchesi, L. 2003b. Adaptive selection of foraging and nesting habitat by black kites (Milvus migrans) and its implications for conservation: a multi-scale approach. Biol. Conserv. 112: 351-362.
63. Sergio, F., Rizolli, F., Marchesi, L. & Pedrini, P. 2004b. The importance of interspecific interactions for breeding-site selection: peregrine falcons seek proximity to raven nests. Ecography 27: 818-826.
64. Serrano, D., Tella, J.L., Forero, M.G. & Donázar, J.A. 2001. Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 568-578.
65. Solonen, T. 1993. Spacing of birds of prey in southern Finland. Ornis Fenn. 70: 129-143.
66. Suárez, S., Balbontín, J. & Ferrer, M. 2000. Nesting habitat selection by booted eagles Hieraaetus pennatus and implications for management. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 215-223.
67. Switzer, P.V. 1997. Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 307-312.
68. Venables, B.D. & Ripley, W.N. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer.
69. Wiens, J.A., Rotenberry, J.T. & Van Horne, B. 1987. Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale. Oikos 48: 132-147.
70. Wiklund, C.G. 1996. Determinants of dispersal in breeding Merlins (Falco columbarius). Ecology 77: 1920-1927.
71. Wolfinger, R. 1993. The GLIMMIX SAS Macro. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.