Self-definition of women experiencing a nontraditional graduate fellowship program

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 852-873

  Buck, Gayle A ^a   Leslie Pelecky, Diandra L ^a   Lu, Yun ^a   Plano Clark, Vicki L ^a   Creswell, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRADUATE STUDENTS; GRADUATE TEACHING FELLOWS; RESEARCH UNIVERSITY; SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM);

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 33750152201     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20126     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Bass, H. (2003). The Carnegie Initiative on the doctorate: The case of mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 50, 767-776.
3. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1997). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind (2nd ed.) New York: Basic Books.
4. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
6. Creswell, J.W., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130.
7. Dresselhaus, M. (1986). Women graduate students. Physics Today, 38, 74-75.
8. Dresselhaus, M., Franz, J., & Clark, B. (1995). Update on the chilly climate for women in physics. The American Physical Society Committee on the Status of Women in Physics Gazette, 14, 4-9.
9. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
10. Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology (Vol. 19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In L. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 17-35). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
12. Ferreira, M. (2003). Gender issues related to graduate student attrition in two science departments. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 969-989.
13. Fox, M. (2000). Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28, 47-61.
14. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Gilligan, C. (1977). Woman's place in man's life cycle. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 431-446.
16. Gilligan, C. (1979). Woman's place in man's life cycle. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 431-436.
17. Girves, J., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 163-189.
18. Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status of Education of Women. Association of American Colleges.
19. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Herzig, A. (2002). Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 177-212.
21. Herzig, A. (2004), Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74, 171-214.
22. Hirt, J., & Muffo, J. (1998). Graduate students: Institutional climates and discipline cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research, 25, 17-33.
23. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
24. Hodgson, B., Scanlon, E., & Whitelegg, E. (2000). Barriers and constraints: Women physicists' perceptions of career progress. Physics Education, 35, 454-459.
25. Hollenshead, C., Soellner-Younce, P., & Wenzel, S. (1994). Women graduate students in mathematics and physics: Reflections on success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 63-88.
26. Hollenshead, C., Wenzel, S., Lazarus, B., & Nair, I. (1996). The graduate experience in the sciences and engineering: Rethinking gendered institutions. In C. Davis, A. Ginorio, C. Hollenshead, B. Lazarus, & P. Raymon (Eds.), The equity equation (pp. 122-162), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Houghton Mifflin Company. (2000). The American heritage dictionary of the English language (4th ed.) [Online]. Available: http://www.yourdictionary.com
28. Kahle, J. (Ed.). (1985). Women in science: A report from the field. New York: Falmer.
29. Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Lovitts, G. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: A sociological analysis of the causes of departure from doctoral studies. College Park: University of Maryland.
33. Lyons, N. (1988). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. In C. Gilligan, J. Ward, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain (pp. 21-48). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Moyer, A., Salovey, P., & Casey-Cannon. S. (1999). Challenges facing female doctoral students and recent graduates. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 607-630.
36. National Research Council. (2001). From scarcity to visibility. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
38. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1992-2001, NSF 04-318. Project Officers Susan T. Hill and Jean M. Johnson (Arlington, VA, 2004).
39. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Studies. (1998). Summary of workshop on graduate student attrition (NSF Publication No. 99-314). Arlington, VA: Author.
40. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
41. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools shortchange girls. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
42. Scholer, A. (1998). Issues of gender and personal life for women in academic biology. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 69-89.
43. Sonnert, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Steffe, L., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558-564.
48. Thoits, P. (1986). Multiple identities: Examining gender and marital status difference in distress. American Sociological Review, 51, 259-272.
49. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.