Teaching cell and molecular biology for gender equity

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 227-238

  Sible, Jill C ^a   Wilhelm, Dayna E ^a   Lederman, Muriel ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TEACHING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PREJUDICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; TEACHING; WRITING;

EID: 33750124004     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.05-08-0096     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alberts, B., Bray, D., Hopkin, K., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P. (2004). Essential Cell Biology, New York: Garland Science.
2. Allen, G., and Baker, J. (2001). Biology: Scientific Progress and Social Issues, Bethesda, MD: Fitzgerald Science Press.
3. American Association of University Women (2000). Techsavvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age, Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
4. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential realism. In: Doing Science and Culture, ed. R. Reid and S. Traweek, New York: Routledge, 221-258.
5. Barman, C. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Sci. Child. 34, 30-33.
6. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., and Henry, J. (1996). Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Bolker, J. A., and Raff, R. A. (1997). Beyond worms, flies, and mice: it's time to widen the scope of developmental biology. J. NIH Res. 9, 35-39.
8. Bordo, S. (1999). Feminist Interpretations of Rene Descartes, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
9. Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: a feminist perspective on learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 38, 282-295.
10. Cooper, G. (2000). The Cell: A Molecular Approach, Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press.
11. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1991). Race, gender and science. Transformations 2, 4-12.
12. Fleck, L. (1935). The Genesis of a Scientific Fact, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Fort, D. C., and Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children 26, 8-13.
14. Gardner, A. L., Mason, C. L., and Matyas, M. L. (1989). Equity, excellence and just plain good teaching. Am. Biol. Teach. 51, 72-77.
15. Gilbert, S. F., and Fausto-Sterling, A. (2003). Educating for social responsibility: changing the syllabus of developmental biology. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 237-244.
16. Hanahan, D., and Weinberg, R. A. (2000). The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70.
17. Henrion, C. (1997). Women in Mathematics: The Addition of Difference, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
18. Hubbard, R. (1990). The Politics of Women's Biology, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Keller, E. F. (1992). Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death, New York: Routledge.
21. Kuhn, T. R. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Kyle, W. C., Jr. (2001). Toward a political philosophy of science education. In: Teaching Science in Diverse Settings: Marginalized Discourses and Classroom Practices, ed. A. C. Barton and M. D. Osborne, New York: Peter Lang.
23. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Lederman, M. (2001). Structuring feminist science. In: The Gender and Science Reader, Vol. 437-446, ed. M. Lederman and I. Bartsch, New York: Routledge.
25. Lederman, M. (2005). Teaching science with the social studies of science for equity. J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng. 11, 257-272.
26. Lederman, M., and Bartsch, I. (2001). The Gender and Science Reader, New York: Routledge.
27. Lee, S., and Roth, W.-M. (2002). Learning science in the community. In: Science Education for Sociopolitical Action, ed. W.-M. Roth and J. Desautels, New York: Peter Lang, 37-66.
28. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 38, 293-316.
29. Mayberry, M. (1999). Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: the comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education. In: Meeting the Challenge: Innovative Feminist Pedagogies in Action, ed. M. Mayberry and E. C. Rose, New York: Routledge, 1-22.
30. Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature, San Francisco: Harper & Row.
31. National Science Foundation (2004). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, Arlington, VA.
32. Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has Feminism Changed Science?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34. Shapin, S. (1996). The Scientific Revolution, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Taylor, P. C., Gilmer, P. J., and Tobin, K. (2002). Transforming Undergraduate Science Teaching: Social Constructivist Perspectives, New York: Peter Lang.
37. Vetter, B. (1984). The scientific and engineering talent pool. Joint Meeting of the Scientific Manpower Commission and the Engineering Manpower Commission, Washington, DC.
38. Watson, J. (1980). The Double Helix, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
39. Weaver, J. A., Morris, M., and Appelbaum, P. (2001). Post Modern Science Education, New York: Peter Lang.