Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy: Or, learning how to intra-act responsibly within the world

Doing Science + Culture

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 221-258

  Barad, Karen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071826323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming(a). Cultural Studies of Twentieth Century Physics. Book manuscript.
2. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. Forthcoming(b). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Book manuscript.
3. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 2000. “Feminist Dislocations and Reconfigurations of Space, Time, and Matter at the End of the Twentieth-Century,�? In Feminist Locations: GlobaliLocaliTheorylPractice, edited by Marianne DeKoven. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
4. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 1998a. “Agential Realism: Feminist Interventions in Understanding Scientific Practices�? In The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli. New York: Routledge.
5. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 1998b. “Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality�?. In differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10, no. 2 (summer).
6. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 1997. “Towards a Diffractive Reading of Diffraction: On Donna Haraway’s Modest_ Witness.�? Paper presented at The Society for the Social Studies annual conference, Tucson, October 24.
7. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 1996. “Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism Without Contradiction.�? In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, edited by Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson, 161-94. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Barad, Karen. Forthcoming. 1995. “A Feminist Approach to Teaching Quantum Physics.�? In Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by Sue V. Rosser, 42-75. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Bohr, Niels. 1963a. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr. Vol. 1: Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press.
10. Bohr, Niels. 1963b. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. 2: Essays, 1932-1951, on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press.
11. Bohr, Niels. 1963C. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. 3: Essays, 1958-1962, on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press.
12. Buchwald, Jed. 1989. The Rise of the Wave Theory of Optics: Optical Theory and Experiment in the Early Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Daston, Lorraine. 1992. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective.�? In Social Studies of Science 22:597-618.
14. Davis, James B. 1951. “For the Ladies, Kitchen Physics.�? In Science Teacher 18 (October).
15. Fernandes, Leela. 1997. Producing Workers: The Politics of Gender, Class, and Culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16. Folse, Henry. 1985. The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity. New York: North Holland Physics Publishing.
17. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
18. Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modesc Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse ™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
20. Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
21. Heldke, Lisa. Forthcoming. “Responsible Agents: Connections between Objectivity as Responsibility and Agential Realism.�? In enGendering Rationalities, edited by Sandi Morgan and Nancy Tuana.
22. Heldke, Lisa. Forthcoming. 1998. “Responsible Agents: Objectivity as Responsibility and Agential Realism,�? Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, August 13.
23. Hennessy, Rosemary. 1993. Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse. New York: Routledge.
24. Irwin, Alan, and Brian Wynne, eds. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kevles, Daniel J. 1971. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26. Kipnis, Nahum. 1991. History of the Principle of Interference of Light. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag.
27. Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
28. Montgomery, Scott L. 1994. Minds for the Making: The Role of Science in American Education, 1750-1990. New York: Guilford Press.
29. Noble, David. 1998. “Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education.�? In Monthly Review 49, no. 9 (February):38-52.
30. Noble, David. “Wag the Dog: Will Private Companies Reshape Higher Education in Their Image?" Manuscript.
31. Noble, David. “The Bloom is off the Rose.�? Manuscript.
32. Pagels, Heinz. 1982. The Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics as the Language of Nature. New York: Bantam Books.
33. Pais, Abraham. 1991. Niels Bohr’s Times In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34. Petersen, Aage. 1985. “The Philosophy of Niels Bohr.�? In Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume, edited by A. P. French and P. J. Kennedy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
35. Rouse, Joseph. 1999. “Feminism and the Two Poles of Naturalism.�? Paper presented at Feminism and Naturalism Conference, St. Louis, September, 25.
36. Rouse, Joseph. 1996a. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
37. Rouse, Joseph. 1996b. “Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.�? In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, edited by Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson, 195-215. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
38. Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
39. Ruchlis, Hyman. 1953. “New Approaches Needed in Physics.�? Science Teacher 20 (February).
40. Rutherford, James F., and Andrew Ahlgren. 1990. Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Shamos, Morris H. 1995. The Myth of Scientific Literacy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
42. Traweek, Sharon. 1998. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
43. Worrall, John. 1976. “Thomas Young and the ‘Refutation’ of Newtonian Optics: A Casestudy in the Interaction of Philosophy of Science and History of Science.�? In Method and Appraisal in Physical Sciences, edited by C. Howson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.