A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli

Journal of Vision

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2006, Pages

  Pan, Fei ^a   Swanson, William H ^a,b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Color vision; Contrast sensitivity; Glaucoma; Perimetry; Spatial summation; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GANGLION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PROCESS MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL SUMMATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COLOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ARTIFACTS; COLOR; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750116429     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/6.11.2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, R. S. (2006). The psychophysics of glaucoma: Improving the structure/function relationship. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 25, 79-97 [PubMed]
2. Anderson, S. J., Mullen, K. T., & Hess, R. F. (1991). Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: Limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. The Journal of Physiology, 442, 47-64. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Dannheim, F., & Drance, S. M. (1971). Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 6, 311-319. [PubMed]
4. DeMarco, P., Pokorny, J., & Smith, V. C. (1992). Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 9, 1465-1476. [PubMed]
5. Gardiner, S. K., Demirel, S., & Johnson, C. A. (2006). Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry. Vision Research, 46, 1732-1745. [PubMed]
6. Garway-Heath, D. F., Caprioli, J., Fitzke, F. W., & Hitchings, R. A. (2000). Scaling the hill of vision: The physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 41, 1774-1782. [PubMed] [Article]
7. Glezer, V. D. (1965). The receptive fields of the retina. Vision Research, 5, 497-525. [PubMed]
8. Goldmann, H. (1999). Fundamentals of exact perimetry. 1945. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 599-604. [PubMed]
9. Graham, N. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Harwerth, R. S., Carter-Dawson, L., Smith, E. L., III, Bames, G., Holt, W. F., & Crawford, M. L. (2004). Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45, 3152-3160. [PubMed] [Article]
11. Inui, T., Mimura, O., & Kani, K. (1981). Retinal sensitivity and spatial summation in the foveal and parafoveal regions. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 151-163. [PubMed]
12. Johnson, C. A., Keltner, J. L., & Balestrery, F. (1978). Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution. Vision Research, 18, 1217-1222. [PubMed]
13. Kasai, N., Takahashi, G., Koyama, N., & Kitahara, K. (1993). An analysis of spatial summation using a Humphrey Field Analyzer. In R. P. Mills (Ed.), Perimetry update (pp. 557-565). Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications.
14. Kelly, D. H. (1983). Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 13, 142-150. [Pubmed]
15. Latham, K., Whitaker, D., Wild, J. M., & Elliott, D. B. (1993). Magnification perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 1691-1701. [PubMed]
16. Legge, G. E., & Foley, J. M. (1980). Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 1458-1471. [PubMed]
17. Losada, M. A., & Mullen, K. T. (1994). The spatial tuning of chromatic mechanisms identified by simultaneous masking. Vision Research, 34, 331-341. [PubMed]
18. Meese, T. S., & Hess, R. F. (2004). Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. Journal of Vision, 4(10), 843-859, http://journalofvision.org/4/10/2/, doi:10.1167/4/10/2. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Meese, T. S., & Williams, C. B. (2000). Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation. Vision Research, 40, 2101-2113. [PubMed]
20. Pan, F., Swanson, W. H., & Dul, M. W. (2006). Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: An approach to reduce test-retest variability. Optometry and Vision Science, 83, 499-511. [PubMed]
21. Petrov, Y., Carandini, M., & McKee, S. (2005). Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8704-8707. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Quick, R. F., Jr. (1974). A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik, 16, 65-67. [PubMed]
23. Robson, J. G., & Graham, N. (1981). Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 21, 409-418. [PubMed]
24. Sloan, L. L. (1961). Area and luminance of test object as variables in examination of thes visual field by projection perimetry. Vision Research, 1, 121-138.
25. Smith, V. C., & Pokorny, J. (1996). The design and use of a cone chromaticity space: A tutorial. Color Research and Application, 21, 375-383.
26. Smith, V. C., & Pokorny, J. (1975). Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Research, 15, 161-171. [PubMed]
27. Spry, P. G., Johnson, C. A., McKendrick, A. M., & Turpin, A. (20Q1). Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42, 1404-1410. [PubMed] [Article]
28. Sun. H.. Dul. M. W.. & Swanson. W. H. (2006). Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula. Optometry and Vision Science, 83, 455-465. [PubMed]
29. Swanson, W. H., & Birch, E. E. (1992). Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical. data. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 409-422. [PubMed]
30. Swanson, W. H., Felius, J., & Pan, F. (2004). Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: Interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45, 466-472. [PubMed] [Article]
31. Swanson, W. H., Wilson, H. R., & Giese, S. C. (1984). Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds. Vision Research, 24, 63-75. [PubMed]
32. Tyler, C. W., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: Attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation. Vision Research, 40, 3121-3144. [PubMed]
33. Watson, A. B. (1987). Estimation of local spatial scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 4, 1579-1582. [PubMed]
34. Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J., Jr. (2005). A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. Journal of Vision, 5(9), 717-740, http://journalofvision.org/5/9/6/, doi:10.1167/5.9.6. [PubMed] [Article]
35. Wetherill, G. B., & Levitt, H. (1965). Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 1-10. [PubMed]
36. Wilson, M. E. (1970). Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field. The Journal of Physiology, 207, 611-622. [PubMed] [Article]