On the influence of cold work on eddy current characterization of near-surface residual stress in shot-peened nickel-base superalloys

Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 107-122

  Yu, Feng ^a   Nagy, Peter B ^a  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

Author keywords

Cold work; Eddy current; Residual stress; Shot peening

Indexed keywords

COLD WORKING; COMPRESSIVE STRESS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; NICKEL ALLOYS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; RESIDUAL STRESSES; SHOT PEENING; SUPERALLOYS; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

APPARENT EDDY CURRENT CONDUCTIVITY; NONDESTRUCTIVE RESIDUAL STRESS ASSESSMENT; SHOT-PEENED NICKEL-BASE SUPERALLOYS;

EDDY CURRENT TESTING;

EID: 33750112511     PISSN: 01959298     EISSN: 15734862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-006-0009-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N. Goldfine, Real-time, quantitative materials characterization using quasistatic spatial mode sensing, 41st Army Sagamore Conference (August, 1994).
2. N. Goldfine, D. Clark, and T. Lovett, Materials characterization using model based meandering winding eddy current testing (MW-ET), EPRI Topical Workshop: Electromagnetic NDE Applications in the Electric Power Industry (Charlotte, NC, August 21-23, 1995).
3. F. C. Schoenig, Jr., J. A. Soules, H. Chang, and J. J. DiCillo, Eddy current measurement of residual stresses induced by shot peening in titanium Ti-6Al-4V, Mat. Eval. 53, pp. 22 (1995).
4. N. Goldfine and D. Clark, Near surface material property profiling for determination of SCC susceptibility, EPRI Balance-of Plant Heat Exchanger NDE Symposium (Jackson, WY, 1996).
5. H. Chang, F. C. Schoenig, Jr., and J. A. Soules, Eddy current offers a powerful tool for investigation of residual stress and other metallurgical properties, Mat. Eval. 57, pp. 1257 (1999).
6. A Primer on the Alternating Current Potential Difference Technique (Matelect Systems, Nepean, Ontario, 1999, pp. 18-21).
7. A. I. Lavrentyev, P. A. Stucky, and W. A. Veronesi, in Review of Progress in QNDE (AIP, Melville, Vol. 19, pp. 1621-1628, 2000).
8. J. M. Fisher, N. Goldfine, and V. Zilberstein, Cold work quality assessment and fatigue characterization using conformable MWM TM eddy current sensors, 49th Defense Working Group on NDT (October 31-November 2, 2000).
9. V. Zilberstein, Y. Sheiretov, A. Washabaugh, Y. Chen, and N.J. Goldfine, in Review of Progress in QNDE (AIP, Melville, Vol. 20, pp. 985-995, 2001).
10. M. P. Blodgett and P. B. Nagy, Eddy current assessment of near-surface residual stress in shot-peened nickel-base superalloys, J. Nondestr. Eval. 23, pp. 107 (2004).
11. F. Yu and P. B. Nagy, Simple analytical approximations for eddy current profiling of the near-surface residual stress in shot-peened metals, J. Appl. Phys. 96, pp. 1257 (2004).
12. F. Yu and P. B. Nagy, Dynamic piezoresistivity calibration for eddy current nondestructive residual stress measurements, J. Nondestr. Eval. 24, pp. 143 (2005).
13. F. Yu, M. P. Blodgett, and P. B. Nagy, Eddy current assessment of near-surface residual stress in shot-peened inhomogeneous nickel-base superalloys, J. Nondestr. Eval. 25, pp. 17 (2006).
14. N. M. White and J. D. Turner, Thick-film sensors: Past, present and future, Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, pp. 1 (1997).
15. S. U. Jen, T. C. Wu, and C. H. Liu, Piezoresistance characteristics of some magnetic and non-magnetic metal films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 256, pp. 54 (2003).
16. S. S. Hecker, M. G. Stout, K. P. Staudhammer, and J. L. Smith, Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless-steel, 1. Magnetic measurements and mechanical-behavior, Metall. Trans. A 13, pp. 619 (1982).
17. A. I. Ivanenko, M. V. Fursa, and P. A. Shcherbakov, Fluxmeter for measuring the magnetic susceptibility of stainless steel samples, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 44, pp. 573 (2001).
18. D. O'Sullivan, M. Cotterell, and I. Meszaros, The characterisation of work-hardened austenitic stainless steel by NDT micro-magnetic techniques, NDT & E Int. 37, pp. 265 (2004).
19. K. Mumtaz, S. Takahashi, J. Echigoya, Y. Kamada, L. F. Zhang, H. Kikuchi, K. Ara, and M. Sato, Magnetic measurements of the reverse martensite to austenite transformation in a rolled austenitic stainless steel, J. Mat. Sci. 39, pp. 1997 (2004).
20. S. Nagarjuna, K. Balasubramanian, and D. S. Sarma, Effect of prior cold work on mechanical properties and structure of an age-hardened Cu-1.5wt Ti alloy, J. Mat. Sci. 32, 3375 (1997).
21. P. S. Prevéy, X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques, Metals Handbook, 9th ed. (ASM International, Metals Park, Vol. 10, pp. 380, 1986).
22. M. G. Moore and W. P. Evans, Mathematical correction for stress in removed layers in X-ray diffraction residual stress analysis, SAE Trans. 66, pp. 340 (1958).
23. D. L. Sikarskie, On a series form of correction to stresses measured using X-ray diffraction, AIME Trans. 239, pp. 577 (1967).
24. Y. F. Al-Obaid, Shot peening mechanics: Experimental and theoretical analysis, Mech. Mater. 19, pp. 251 (1995).
25. M. Kobayashi, T. Matsui, and Y. Murakami, Mechanism of creation of compressive residual stress by shot peening, Int. J. Fatigue 20, pp. 351 (1998).
26. G. H. Majzoobi, R. Azizi, and A. Alavi Nia, A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts, J. Mater. Process. Techn. 164, pp. 1226 (2005).
27. M. P. Blodgett, F. Yu, and P. B. Nagy, Review of Progress in QNDE (AIP, New York, Vol. 24, pp. 1347-1354, 2005).
28. F. Yu and P. B. Nagy, Review of Progress in QNDE (AIP, New York, Vol. 24, pp. 1371-1358, 2005).
29. J. Reekie and Y. L. Yao, Magnetic anisotropy and cold worked texture of titanium, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 69, pp. 417 (1956).
30. B. L. Morris and A. Wold, Faraday balance for measuring Magnetic susceptibility, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 39, pp. 1937 (1968).
31. G. J. Hill, The influence of positioning errors on susceptibility measurements, J. Sci. Instrum. 1, pp. 52 (1968).
32. A. Rais, Absolute method of calibration of a Faraday microbalance, Measurement 35, pp. 289 (2004).
33. M. S. Seehra and V. S. Babu, Low temperature magnetic transition and high temperature oxidation in Inconel alloy 718, J. Mater. Res. 11, pp. 1133 (1996); Erratum and Addendum J. Mater. Res. 20, pp. 1081 (2005).
34. M. P. Blodgett, C. V. Ukpabi, and P. B. Nagy, Surface roughness influence on eddy current electrical conductivity measurements, Mat. Eval. 61, pp. 765 (2003).
35. K. Kalyanasundaram and P. B. Nagy, A simple numerical model for calculating the apparent loss of eddy current conductivity due to surface roughness, NDT&E Int. 37, pp. 47 (2004).
36. F. Yu and P. B. Nagy, Numerical method for calculating the apparent eddy current conductivity loss on randomly rough surfaces, J. Appl. Phys. 95, pp. 8340 (2004).
37. G. T. Medan, Electrical Resistance of Metals, (Plenum Press, New York, pp. 122-123 1965).