Off-pump coronary bypass surgery: Pros and cons;Chirurgia coronarica a cuore battente: Stato attuale delle evidenze

Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 445-453

  Parolari, Alessandro ^a   Alamanni, Francesco ^a   Polvani, Gianluca ^a   Agrifoglio, Marco ^a   Zanobini, Marco ^a   Porqueddu, Massimo ^a   Roberto, Maurizio ^a   Naliato, Moreno ^a   Dainese, Luca ^a   Fusari, Melissa ^a   Tremoli, Elena ^a   Biglioli, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass surgery; Off pump coronary artery bypass

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; META ANALYSIS; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSFUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DRUG CONTRAINDICATION; LENGTH OF STAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; META-ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 33750094389     PISSN: 18276806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Lytle BW, Sabik JF. On-pump and off-pump bypass surgery: tools for revascularization. Circulation 2004; 109: 810-2.
2. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001; 323: 334-6.
3. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Isom OW, et al. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 557-64.
4. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary by-pass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 167-73.
5. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, Houghtaling PL, Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM. Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 142-8.
6. Williams ML, Muhlbaier LH, Schroder JN, et al. Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2005; 112 (Suppl): I366-I370.
7. Parolari A, Biglioli P, Alamanni F. Improved early outcomes after OPCAB: when will the final answer come? Circulation 2004; 109: e181.
8. Jones RH. The year in cardiovascular surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1517-28.
9. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 1194-9.
10. Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 789-93.
11. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 797-808.
12. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1841-9.
13. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation 2005; 111: 2858-64.
14. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 21-8.
15. Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1791-3.
16. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al, for the OCTOPUS Study Group. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 394-402.
17. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Cannata A, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis of currently available randomized trials. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 37-40.
18. van der Heijden GJ, Nathoe HM, Jansen EW, Grobbee DE. Meta-analysis on the effect of off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 81-4.
19. Reston JT, Tregear SJ, Turkelson CM. Meta-analysis of short-term and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1510-5.
20. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ, for the Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 188-203.
21. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity. Meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 872-82.
22. Jones RH. Intraoperative crossover: the well-kept surgical secret to apparent surgical success. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1529-31.
23. Legare JF, Buth KJ, Hirsch GM. Conversion to on-pump from OPCAB is associated with increased mortality: results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 296-301.
24. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Polvani G, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with on-pump coronary bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 2121-5.
25. Lingaas PS, Hol PK, Lundblad R, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. A prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 2004; 7: 37-41.
26. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al, for the Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) Study group. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation 2004; 110: 3418-23.
27. Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, et al. Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation 2005; 112 (Suppl): I338-I343
28. Biglioli P, Cannata A, Alamanni F, et al. Biological effects of off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery surgery: focus on inflammation, hemostasis and oxidative stress. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24: 260-9.
29. Parolari A, Mussoni L, Frigerio M, et al. Increased prothrombotic state lasting as long as one month after on-pump and off-pump coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 303-8.
30. Franke A, Lante W, Fackeldey V, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines after different kinds of cardio-thoracic surgical procedures: is what we see what we know? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 569-75.
31. Prondzinsky R, Knupfer A, Loppnow H, et al. Surgical trauma affects the proinflammatory status after cardiac surgery to a higher degree than cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 760-6.
32. Stamou SC, Jablonski KA, Hill PC, Bafi AS, Boyce SW, Corso PJ. Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass versus the conventional approach in high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 552-7.
33. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, et al. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1387-93.
34. Sharony R, Bizekis CS, Kanchuger M, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and stroke in patients with atheromatous aortas: a case control study. Circulation 2003; 108 (Suppl 1): II15-II20.
35. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 406-13.
36. Wolman RL, Nussmeier NA, Aggarwal A, et al. Cerebral injury after cardiac surgery: identification of a group at extraordinary risk. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group (McSPI) and the Ischemia Research Education Foundation (IREF) Investigators. Stroke 1999; 30: 514-22.
37. Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, et al. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke 2001; 32: 2874-81.
38. van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Hijman R, et al. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002; 287: 1405-12.
39. van Dijk D, Moons KG, Keizer AM, et al. Association between early and three month cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Heart 2004; 90: 431-4.
40. Selnes OA, McKhann GM. Neurocognitive complications after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Neurol 2005; 57: 615-21.
41. Loef BG, Epema AH, Navis G, Ebels T, van Oeveren W, Henning RH. Off-pump coronary revascularization attenuates transient renal damage compared with on-pump coronary revascularization. Chest 2002; 121: 1190-4.
42. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 493-8.
43. Anderson RE, Brismar K, Barr G, Ivert T. Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on glucose homeostasis after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 425-30.