The economic implications of carbon cycle uncertainty

Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 586-590

  Smith, Steven J ^a   Edmonds, James A ^a  

^a Joint Global Change Research Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON CYCLE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; UNCERTAINTY ROLE;

EID: 33750073476     PISSN: 02806509     EISSN: 16000889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00217.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Stouffer, R. J., Dix, M. and co-authors 2001. Chapter 9. Projections of Future Climate Change. In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. (eds J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden and D. Xiaosu). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 239-287.
2. Edmonds, J. and Reilly, J. 1985. Global Energy: Assessing the Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
3. Edmonds, J. A. and Smith, S. J. 2006. The Technology of Two Degrees. In: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. (eds H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley and G. Yohe). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. 2 in a B2 world: Insights on the roles of carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and transportation technologies, Energy Econ. 26, 517-537.
5. Edmonds, J. A., Pitcher, H. M. and Sands, R. D. 2004b. Second Generation Model 2004: An Overview. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-14916.
6. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J. and co-authors. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 239-287.
7. Houghton, R. A. 2003. Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Global Change Biol. 9 (4), 500-509.
8. bj ECTS) Framework and Hybrid Modeling of Transportation. Energy J., in press.
9. Metz, B. Davidson, O. Swart, R. Pan J. (eds) 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. The Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds). 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
11. Raper, S. C. B., Wigley, T. M. L. and Warrick, R. A. 1996. In: Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Subsidence: Causes, Consequences and Strategies (eds J. D. Milliman and B. U. Haq). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 11-45.
12. Richels, R., Edmonds, J., Gruenspecht, H. and Wigley, T. 1996. The Berlin Mandate: The Design of Cost-Effective Mitigation Strategies. In: Climate Change: Integrating Science, Economics and Policy, CP-96-1:29-48. (eds N. Nakicenovic, W. D. Nordhaus, R. Richels and F. L. Toth). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 20 pp.
13. Smith, S. J. and Wigley, T. M. L. 2006. Multi-Gas Forcing Stabilization with the MiniCAM. Energy J., in press.
14. Smith, S. J., Pitcher, H. and Wigley, T. M. L. 2005. Future Sulfur Dioxide Emissions. Climatic Change 73 (3), pp. 267-318.
15. Weyant, J. P. (ed) 2004. EMF 19 Alternative Technology Strategies for Climate Change Policy. Energy Econ. 26 (4), 501-755.
16. Wigley, T. M. L. 1993. Balancing the carbon budget - implications for projections of future carbon-dioxide concentration changes. Tellus 45B, 409-425.
17. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. 1992. implications for climate and sea-level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature 357, 293-300.
18. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. 2001. Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science 293 (5529), 451-454.
19. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. 2002. Reasons for larger warming projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report. J. Climate 15, 2945-2952.
20. 2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240-243.