Leaf carbohydrate controls over Arabidopsis growth and response to elevated CO2: An experimentally based model

New Phytologist

Volumn 172, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 500-513

  Rasse, Daniel P ^a,b   Tocquin, Pierre ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b UPMC University Paris 06   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acclimation; Allocation model; Assimilate allocation; Elevated CO2; Leaf starch; Leaf sucrose

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON DIOXIDE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER; SEX1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; STARCH; SUCROSE;

ANGIOSPERM; CARBON DIOXIDE; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; GROWTH; GROWTH MODELING; LEAF; STARCH;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON DIOXIDE; MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; MUTATION; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; STARCH; SUCROSE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 33750029368     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01848.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bae H, Sicher R. 2004. Changes of soluble protein expression and leaf metabolite levels in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Field Crops Research 90: 61-73.
2. Bonato O, Schulthess F, Baumgartner J. 1999. Simulation model for maize crop growth based on acquisition and allocation processes for carbohydrate and nitrogen. Ecological Modelling 124: 11-28.
3. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange rates of leaves. Planta 153: 376-387.
4. Caspar T, Huber SC, Somerville C. 1985. Alterations in growth, photosynthesis and respiration in a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) deficient in chloroplast phosphoglucomutase activity. Plant Physiology 79: 11-17.
5. Caspar T, Lin T-P, Kakefuda G, Benbow L, Preiss J, Somerville C. 1991. Mutants of Arabidopsis with altered regulation of starch degradation. Plant Physiology 95: 1181-1188.
6. 2 on the expression of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase genes and carbohydrate accumulation in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Physiology 116: 715-723.
7. Coruzzi GM, Zhou L. 2001. Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants: emerging 'matrix effects'. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 247-253.
8. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313.
9. Dewar RC, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE. 1998. A mechanistic analysis of light and carbon use efficiencies. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 573-588.
10. 2 on plants: photosynthesis, transpiration, primary productivity and biodiversity. Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science 4: 53-59.
11. 2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609-639.
12. 2 uptake and electron transport rates in wild-type and a starchless mutant of Nicotiana sylvestris. Plant Physiology 106: 679-687.
13. Escobar-Gutiérrez AJ, Daudet FA, Gaudillere JP, Maillard P, Frossard JS. 1998. Modelling of allocation and balance of carbon in walnut ( Juglans regia L.) seedlings during heterotrophy-autotrophy transition. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194: 29-47.
14. 3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
15. Geiger M, Haake V, Ludewig F, Sonnewald U, Stitt M. 1999. The nitrate and ammonium nitrate supply have a major influence on the response of photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, nitrogen metabolism and growth to elevated carbon dioxide in tobacco. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1177-1199.
16. Geiger DR, Servaites JC, Fuchs MA. 2000. Role of starch in carbon translocation and partitioning at the plant level. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 571-582.
17. Gibeaut DM, Hulett J, Cramer GR, Seemann JR. 1997. Maximal biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana using a simple, low-maintenance hydroponic method and favorable environmental conditions. Plant Physiology 115: 317-319.
18. Gibeaut DM, Cramer GR, Seemann JR. 2001. Growth, cell walls, and UDP-Glc dehydrogenase activity of Arabidopsis thaliana grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Journal of Plant Physiology 158: 569-576.
19. Gibon Y, Blasing OE, Palacios-Rojas N, Pankovic D, Hendriks JHM, Fisahn J, Hohne M, Gunther M, Stitt M. 2004. Adjustment of diurnal starch turnover to short days: depletion of sugar during the night leads to a temporary inhibition of carbohydrate utilization, accumulation of sugars and post-translational activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in the following light period. Plant Journal 39: 847-862.
20. Grimmer C, Komor E. 1999. Assimilate export by leaves of Ricinus communis L. growing under normal and elevated carbon dioxide concentrations: the same rate during the day, a different rate at night. Planta 209: 275-281.
21. Hirai Y, Tsuda M, Enaida A. 2002. Efficient dry matter production at the vegetative stage because of low maintenance respiration rate among rice varieties. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 71: 110-115.
22. 2 concentration does not directly affect leaf respiration in bean or poplar. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 1139-1151.
23. Jang J-C, Leon P, Sheen J. 1997. Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9: 5-19.
24. Jones MGK. 1979. An enzymic microassay for starch. Plant, Cell & Environment 2: 227-234.
25. Koch KE. 1996. Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47: 509-540.
26. Kofler H, Häusler RE, Schulz B, Gröner F, Flügge UI, Weber A. 2000. Molecular characterisation of a new mutant allele of the plastid phosphoglucomutase in Arabidopsis, and complementation of the mutant with the wild-type cDNA. Molecular and General Genetics 263: 978-986.
27. Krapp A, Hofmann B, Schafer C, Stitt M. 1993. Regulation of the expression of rbcS and other photosynthetic genes by carbohydrates: a mechanism for the 'sink regulation' of photosynthesis? Plant Journal 3: 817-828.
28. Lloyd JR, Kossmann J, Ritte G. 2005. Leaf starch degradation comes out of the shadows. Trends in Plant Science 10: 1360-1385.
29. 2. FEBS Letters 429: 147-151.
30. 2. Plant and Cell Physiology 40: 999-1006.
31. 2. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 905-915.
32. 2. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 567-582.
33. 2 - do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist 162: 253-280.
34. Ogren E. 2000. Maintenance respiration correlates with sugar but not nitrogen concentration in dormant plants. Physiologia Plantarum 108: 295-299.
35. Parsons R, Weyers JDB, Lawson T, Godber IM. 1997. Rapid and straightforward estimates of photosynthetic characteristics using a portable gas exchange system. Photosynthetica 34: 265-279.
36. Paul MJ, Foyer CH. 2001. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 1383-1400.
37. 2 differentially affects needle chloroplast ultrastructure and phloem anatomy in Pinus palustris: Interactions with soil resource availability. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 461-471.
38. dePury DGG, Farquhar GD. 1997. Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 537-557.
39. 2 fluxes and long-term tree growth in temperate forests with ASPECTS. Ecological Modelling 141: 35-52.
40. 2 uptake. Global Change Biology 11: 369-377.
41. Ryan MG. 1991. Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecological Applications 1: 157-167.
42. Ryan MG, Hubbard RM, Pongracic S, Raison RJ, McMurtrie RE. 1996. Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiata in relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiology 16: 333-343.
43. 2 enrichment. Plant and Cell Physiology 42: 1093-1102.
44. Schulze W, Stitt M, Schulze E-D, Neuhaus HE, Fichtner K. 1991. A quantification of the significance of assimilatory starch for growth of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Plant Physiology 95: 890-895.
45. 2: a relationship between starch degradation and sugar sensing. Plant Biology 6: 280-288.
46. 2 environment for photosynthetic acclimation. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 1189-1196.
47. 2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant, Cell & Environment 14: 741-762.
48. Stitt M. 1996. Metabolic regulation of photosynthesis. In: Baker NR, ed. Photosynthesis and the Environment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 635-640.
49. 2 sensitivity in Arabidopsis plants with low ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity. Plant Physiology 119: 267-276.
50. 2 enrichment on growth, carbohydrates, and rubisco in Arabidopsis starch mutants. Significance of starch and hexose. Plant Physiology 130: 1573-1583.
51. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, Selbig J, Muller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M. 2004. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant Journal 37: 914-939.
52. Tocquin P, Périlleux C. 2004. Design of a versatile device for measuring whole plant gas exchanges in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 162: 223-230.
53. Tocquin P, Corbesier L, Havelange A, Pieltain A, Kurtem E, Bernier G, Périlleux C. 2003. A novel high efficiency, low maintenance, hydroponic system for synchronous growth and flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology 3: 2.
54. 2 enrichment and nitrogen supply is basically a matter of growth rate adjustment. Physiologia Plantarum. (In press.)
55. Trethewey RN, ap Rees T. 1994. A mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana lacking the ability to transport glucose across the chloroplast envelope. Biochemical Journal 301: 449-454.
56. -1. Plant Biology 1: 482-486.
57. 2 on growth and development of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Phyton - Annales Rei Botanicae 36: 173-184.
58. 10 alter ecosystem carbon balance. Global Change Biology 11: 435-449.
59. Yang ZJ, Midmore DJ. 2005. Modelling plant resource allocation and growth partitioning in response to environmental heterogeneity. Ecological Modelling 181: 59-77.
60. Yu TS, Kofler H, Hausler RE, Hille D, Flugge UI, Zeeman SC, Smith AM, Kossmann J, Lloyd J, Ritte G, Steup M, Lue WL, Chen JC, Weber A. 2001. The Arabidopsis sex1 mutant is defective in the R1 protein, a general regulator of starch degradation in plants, and not in the chloroplast hexose transporter. Plant Cell 13: 1907-1918.
61. Zeeman SC, ap Rees T. 1999. Changes in carbohydrate metabolism and assimilate export in starch-excess mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1445-1453.
62. Zeeman SC, Northrop F, Smith AM, ap Rees T. 1998. A starch-accumulating mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in a chloroplastic starch-hydrolysing enzyme. Plant Journal 15: 357-365.
63. Zeeman SC, Smith SM, Smith AM. 2004. The breakdown of starch in leaves. New Phytologist 163: 247-261.
64. 2 concentration and UV-B radiation. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 581-590.