Law and the Semantic Web, an introduction

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3369 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-17

  Benjamins, V Richard ^a   Casanovas, Pompeu ^b   Breuker, Joost ^c   Gangemi, Aldo ^d  

^a ISOCO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEGAL DOMAINS; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTION;

INFORMATION SERVICES; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 33750021245     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. Abel, R.L. (ed.): Lawyers: A Critical Reader. The New Press, New York (1997)
2. Gray, P. N.: Artificial Legal Intelligence. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1997)
3. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: Computer Representation of the Law, Proceedings of IJCAI-85. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (CA) (1985 )1269-1270
4. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.J.: The use of logical models in legal problem solving, Ratio Juris, Vol. 2 n. 3, (1990) 201-218
5. Alchourrón, C, Martino, A.: A Sketch of Logic without Truth. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL-89), ACM, New York (1999) 165-179
6. Sergot, A., Jones, M.: Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. Artificial Intelligence and Law Vol. 1 n.1 (1992): 45-6
7. Ashley, K and Rissland, E: A case based approach to modelling legal expertise. IEEE Expert, (1988) 70-77
8. Valente, A.: Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modelling Approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)
9. Rodrigo, L., Blázquez, M., Casanovas, P. Poblet, M.: D10.1.1. Before Analysis. Case Study-Intelligent integrated support for legal professionals. State of the Art. EU-IST, IST-2003-506826 SEKT: Semantically Enabled Knowledge Technologies
10. Fabri, M.; Contini, F. (eds.): .Justice and Technology in Europe : How ICT is changing the Judicial Business. The Hague, Kluwer Int. Law (2001)
11. Ayuso, M. et al.: 2003Jueces jóvenes en España, 2002. Análisis estadístico de las encuestas a los jueces en su primer destino (Promociones 48/49 y 50). Internal Report for the General Council of the Judiciary, within the framework of the Project "Observatory of Judicial Culture", SEC-2001-2581-C02-01/02
12. Hokkanen, J., Lauritsen, M.: Knowledge tools for legal knowledge tool makers. Artificial Intelligence and Law Vol. 10 (2002) 295-302
13. Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L.: Accessibility of Information on the Web. Nature, July 8, Vol. 400 (1999) 107-109
14. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 17, 2001
15. Studer, R.; Benjamins, V.R.; Fensel, D.: Knowledge Engineering, Principles and Methods. In: Data & Knowledge Engineering Vol. 25 n. 1-2, (1998) 161-197
16. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/
17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main-Page
18. http://dmoz.org/
19. See for example: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen-demos- rationale-report/hpapplications-survey.html, http://challenge.semanticweb.org/, and http://elcano.isoco.net
20. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O. Ontological Engineering, with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, London, Berlin (2003)
21. Davies, J.; Fensel, D.; van Harmelen, F. (eds). Towards the Semantic Web. Ontology-Driven knowledge Management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2003)
22. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic-web
23. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/03/07/buildingsw.html
24. http://www.esperonto.net
25. Cerf, V.G.: Internet and the Justice System. 79 Washington Law Review 25 (2004)
26. Endeshaw, A.: Web Services and the Law: A Scketch of the Potential Issues. 11 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 251 (2003)
27. Caral, J.M.E.A: Lessons from ICANN: Is Self-Regulation of the Internet Fundamentally Flawed? 12 International Journal of Law and Information Technology (2004)
28. Sylverman, G.M.: Rise of the Machines: Justice Information Systems and the Question of Public Access to Court Records Over the Internet. 79 Washington Law Review (2004)
29. Davies, N.J., Fensel, D., Richardson, M.: The future of Web Services. BT Technology Journal Vol. 22 n. 1 (2004) 118-130.
30. Susskind, R.: Transforming the Law. Essays on Technology, Justice and the Legal Marketplace. Oxford, Oxford University Press (2000)
31. Mountain, D.: XML E-Contracts: Documents That Describe Themselves. 11 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 274 (2003)
32. Benoliel, D.: Cyberspace Technological Standardization: An Institutional Theory Retrospective. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1259 (2003)
33. Benoliel, D.: Technological Standards, INC: Rethinking Cyberspace Regulatory Epistemology. 92 California Law Review 1069 (2004)
34. Biegel, S.: Beyond our control? Confronting the limits of our legal system in the age of cyberspace. MASS., The MIT Press (2002)
35. Dahm, A.L.: Database Protection vs. Deep Linking. 82 Texas Law Review 1053 (2004)
36. Lessig, L: The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York. Random House (2001)
37. http://www.creativecommons.org
38. Hunter, D.: Cyberspace as place and the tragedy of the digital anticommons. 91 California Law Review 439 (2003)
39. Schwartz, P.M: Property, Privacy, and Personal Data. 117 Harvard Law Review 2055 (2004)
40. Winkels, R., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R.: CLIME: Lessons Learned in Legal Information Serving. In: van Harmelen, F. (ed.): Proceedings of ECAI-2002. IOS Press: Amsterdam (2002) 230-234
41. Gruber, T.R. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 199-220
42. Hohfeld, W.N. (1919). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Cooke, W.W (ed.) New Haven,Yale University Press (1919)
43. Allen L.E, Saxon C.S.: Better Language, Better Thought, Better Communication: The AHOHFELD Language for Legal Analysis. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law,(ICAIL-95), ACM, New York (1995)
44. McCarty, L.T: A Language for Legal Discourse: I. Basic Features. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press (1989)
45. van Kralingen, R.W.: Frame-based Conceptual Models of Statute Law. Kluwer Law Intl., Amsterdam, (1995)
46. Visser , R.S.P. , Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Ontologies in the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Towards a Library of Legal Domain Ontologies. First International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, Melbourne Law School, Victoria (1997)
47. Visser, R.S. P., Bench-Capon , T.J.M.: A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1998) 27-57
48. Gangemi, A., Breuker J.: Section 5. Harmonizing Legal Ontologies. In: Deliverable 3.4. Harmonisation perspectives of some promising content standards. Ontoweb SIG on Content Standards Legal Ontologies Working Group, Project IST-2000-29243 (2002)
49. Breuker, J., Gangemi, A., Tiscornia, D., Winkels, R. (eds.): ICAIL03 Wks on Legal Ontologies, Edinburgh, http://lri.jur.uva.nl/~winkels/legontICAIL2003. html (2003)
50. Jarrar, M., Salaun, A. (eds.): First Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies, OTM Workshops, Springer (2003)
51. Jarrar, M., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Second Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies, OTM Workshops, Springer (2004)
52. http://ontology.ip.rm.cnr.it/onto/legontoweb.html.
53. Winkels, R., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R.: METAlex: An XML Standard for Legal Documents. In: Proceedings of the XML Europe Conference, London (UK) (2003)
54. Aikenhead, M.: Recycling law?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 4 (3) (1996)
55. A Fourth Framework European Project IST 25414, 1998-2001, see http://www.bmtech.co.uk/clime/index.html
56. Gangemi, A., Pisanelli D.M.; Steve, G. A.: Formal Ontology Framework to Represent Norm Dynamics. In: Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, University of Amsterdam (2001)
57. A Fifth Framewrok European Project IST 28199, 2000-2003. See http://www.intrasoftintl.com/ecourt
58. A Fifth Framework European Project IST 28125. See http://www.lri.jur.uva. nl/~epower
59. Boer, A., Engers T. van, Winkels. R.: Using Ontologies for Comparing and Harmonizing Legislation. In: Proceedings of ICAIL2003, ISBN 1-58113-747-8, ACM Press, New York (2003)
60. http://www.ittig.cnr.it/Ricerca/UnitaEng.php?Id=11&T=4
61. Finke, N.D.: TEI Extensions for Legal Text. In: Text Encoding Initiative Tenth Anniversary User Conference (1997)
62. http://www.normainrete.it
63. http://www.lexml.de/mission-english.htm
64. http://www.legalxml.org/
65. A Sixth Framework European Project IST-2003-506826. SEKT: Semantically Enabled Knowledge Technologies. http://www.sekt-project.com
66. th Annual Conference in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004. T.F. Gordon (Ed.) pp. 69-77
67. Amselek, P., MacCormick N.: Controversies about Law's Ontology. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press (1989)
68. Paliwala, A.: An Intellectual Celebration: A Review of the Jurix Legal Knowledge Based Systems Scholarship. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2001) 317-335
69. Boer, A.; Hoekstra, R. and Winkels R. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Proceedings of JURIX 2002, 1-10, Amsterdam, IOS Press (2002)
70. http://www.metalex.nl