Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 60-69

  Boer, Alexander ^a   Van Engers, Tom ^b   Winkels, Radboud ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Dutch Tax and Customs Administration   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODELING; DRAFT LEGISLATION; EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNION; MEMBER STATE; POWER PROJECTS; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; TAX AUTHORITIES; TAX LEGISLATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ONTOLOGY;

TAXATION;

EID: 77957766567     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1047788.1047798     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. T. Bench-Capon and G. Sartor. Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law. In J. Breuker, R. Leenes, and R. Winkels, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX-2000), Amsterdam, 2000. IOS Press. ISBN 1.58603.144.9.
2. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pages 37-45. ACM Press, 1989.
3. A. Boer. The Consultancy Game. In J. Breuker, R. Leenes, and R. Winkels, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX-2000), pages 99-112, Amsterdam, 2000. IOS Press.
4. A. Boer. MILE: Turning Legal Information into Legal Advice. In A. Tjoa and R. Wagner, editors, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pages 787-791, Los Alamitos (CA), 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
5. A. Boer, R. Hoekstra, and R. Winkels, METALex: Legislation in XML. In A. D. T. Bench-Capon and R. Winkels, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference., pages 1-10, Amsterdam, 2002. IOS Press.
6. D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. A framework for ontology integration. In Proceedings of the First Semantic Web Working Symposium, pages 303-316, 2001.
7. N. den Haan and J. Breuker. Constructing Normative Rules. In Proceedings of JURIX'96, pages 135-147, 1996.
8. J. Doyle and M. P. Wellman. Representing preference as ceteris paribus comparatives. In Decision-Theoretic Planning: Papers from the 1994 Spring AAAI Symposium, pages 69-75. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1994.
9. E. Engelen. Financialization, Pension Restructuring, and the Logic of Funding. In Proceeedings of SASE 2002, 2002.
10. A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, C. Masolo, A. Oltramari, and L. Schneider. Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In A. Gómez-Prez and V. R. Benjamins, editors, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, 13th International Conference, EKAW 2002, Siguenza, Spain, October 1-4, 2002, volume 2473 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 166-181. Springer, 2002.
11. A. Gangemi, D. M. Pisanelli, and G. Steve. A formal Ontology Framework to Represent Norm Dynamics. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies (LEGONT), 2001.
12. W. Hettich and S. L. Winer. Economic and political foundations of tax structure. American Economic Review, 78(4):701-712, 1988.
13. W. Hettich and S. L. Winer. Rules, Politics, and the Normative Analysis of Taxation. Carleton Economic Papers 00-12, Carleton University, 2000.
14. I. Horrocks and S. Tessaris. A conjunctive query language for description logic aboxes. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 399-404, 2000.
15. M. Kohen. Europe and the Standardization of the Law: Past and Present. In Proceedings of the Conference on Globalisation and International Relations in the 21st Century, 2002.
16. M. Muller. The RDF Dictionary and the standardisation process in the legal domain. In Proceedings of XML Europe, 2002.
17. L. Pallipoli, F. Pirri, and C. Pizzuti. Algorithms for Selective Enumeration of Prime Implicants. Artificial Intelligence,, 111:41-72, 1999.
18. H. Pinto, A. Prez, and J. Martins. Some issues on ontology integration. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5), 1999.
19. E. Rissland and T. Friedman. Detecting change in legal concepts. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-99) pages 127-136, New York (NY), 1995. ACM.
20. S. Spreeuwenberg, T. van Engers, and R. Gerrits. The Role of Verification in Improving the Quality of Legal Decisionmaking. In B. Verheij, A. Lodder, R. Loui, and A. Muntjewerff, editors, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX-2001), pages 1-16, Amsterdam, 2001. IOS Press. ISBN 1.58603.201.1.
21. J. Straach and K. Truemper. Learning to Ask Relevant Questions. Artificial Intelligence, 111:301-328, 1999.
22. A. Valente. Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modeling Approach. PhD thesis, Amsterdam, 1995.
23. A. Valente and J. Breuker. ON-LINE: An architecture for modelling legal information. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-1995), pages 307-315, 1995.
24. L. W. N. van der Torre and Y.-H. Tan. Contextual deontic logic. In P. Bonzon, M. Cavalcanti, and R. Nossum, editors, Formal Aspects of Context, pages 143-160. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000.
25. C. van Laer. The Applicability of Comparative Concepts. European Journal of Comparative Law, 2.2, 1998.
26. R. Winkels, D. Bosscher, A. Boer, and J. Breuker. Generating Exception Structures for Legal Information Serving. In T. Gordon, editor, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-99), pages 182-195, New York (NY), 1999. ACM.