Client-centered home care: Balancing between competing responsibilities

Clinical Nursing Research

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 231-254

  Schoot, Tineke ^a   Proot, Ireen ^b   Legius, Marja ^c   Ter Meulen, Ruud ^d   De Witte, Luc ^a  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c FONTYS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Awareness; Client centered care; Dialogue; Ethical reflection; Responsibility taking

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSERTIVENESS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CONFLICT; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MODEL; NETHERLANDS; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING ASSISTANT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ASSERTIVENESS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NURSING; NEGOTIATING; NETHERLANDS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSES' AIDES; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 33750018825     PISSN: 10547738     EISSN: 15523799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1054773806291845     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boeije, H. R. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391-409.
2. Burger, A. M., Erlen, J. A., & Tesone, L. (1992). Factors influencing ethical decision making in the home setting. Home Healthcare Nurse, 10(1), 16-20.
3. Cahill, J. (1998). Patient participation: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 119-128.
4. Chewning, B., & Sleath, B. (1996). Medication decision-making and management: A client-centred model. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 389-398.
5. Corley, M. C. (2002). Nurse moral distress: A proposed theory and research agenda. Nursing Ethics, 9, 636-650.
6. Council for Public Health. (1998). Naar een meer vraaggerichte zorg [Towards increased demand-orientedness]. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Author.
7. de Klaver, P. M., & Scholten, C. (2002). De vraag naar thuiszorg: Literaturstudie naar voorbeelden van (meer) vraaggestuurde thuiszorg [The demand for home care: A literature study concerning examples of (improved) client-centred home care]. Leiden, The Netherlands: SWOKA.
8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Elander, G., Dreschler, K., & Persson, W. K. (1993). Ethical dilemmas in long-term care settings: Interviews with nurses in Sweden and England. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 30, 91-97.
10. Elwyn, G. (2001). Shared decision making: Patient involvement in clinical practice. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
11. Foundation for Research and Development in Home Care. (2002). Thuiszorg op zoek naar de gunst van de klant [Home care looking for the client's favour]. Bunnik, the Netherlands: SWOKA/Research voor Beleid/Author.
12. Jameton, A. (1993). Dilemmas of moral distress: moral responsibility and nursing practice. Clinical Issues of Perinatal Womans Health Nursing, 4, 542-551.
13. Jewell, S. E. (1994). Patient participation: What does it mean to nurses? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 433-438.
14. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Lutzen, K., Cronqvist, A., Magnusson, A., & Andersson, L. (2003). Moral stress: Synthesis of a concept. Nursing Ethics, 10, 312-322.
16. May, C. (1990). Research on nurse-patient relationships: Problems of theory, problems of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 307-315.
17. National Council for Public Health. (1989). Discussienota thuiszorg [Discussion paper on home care]. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Author.
18. Peters, V. (2000). Kwalitan 5.0: Gebruikershandleiding [Kwalitan 5.0: User manual]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
19. Raines, M. L. (2000). Ethical decision making in nurses. Relationships among moral reasoning, coping style and ethics stress. JONA's Healthcare, Law, Ethics, and Regulation, 2, 29-41.
20. Sainio, C., Lauri, S., & Ericksson, E. (2001). Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nursing Ethics, 8, 97-113.
21. Schoot, T., Proot, I., ter Meulen, R., & de Witte, L. (2005a). Actual interaction and client-centredness in home-care. Clinical Nursing Research, 14(4), 370-393.
22. Schoot, T., Proot, I., ter Meulen, R., & de Witte, L. (2005b). Recognition of client values as a basis for tailored care: The view of Dutch expert patients and family caregivers. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 169-176.
23. Sim, J., & Sharp, K. (1998). A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, 23-31.
24. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. ten Have, H. A. M. J., ter Meulen, R. H. J., & van Leeuwen, E. (2003). Medische ethiek [Medical ethics]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
26. Terpstra, E. (1997). Beleidsmatige dilemma's bij de vormgeving van vraaggestuurde zorg. In L. Boon (Ed.), Vraaggestuurde zorg [Demand-driven care] (pp. 7-13). Amstelveen, The Netherlands: Stichting Sympoz.
27. Tonkens, E. (2003). Mondige burgers, getemde professionals. Marktwerking, vraagsturing en professionaliteit in de publieke sector [Empowered citizens and tamed professionals: The market, demand-driven care and professionalism in the public sector]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Care and Welfare (NIZW).
28. Tronto, J. C. (1994). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
29. Van den Bos, G. A. M., Frijling, B. W., Koster-Dreese, Y., Schnabel, P., & Spreeuwenberg, C. (Eds.). (1999). Chronisch-ziekenbeleid in de jaren negentig [Health care policy for the chronically ill in the nineties]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij SWP.
30. Van der Arend, A., & Remmers-van den Hurk, C. H. (1999). Moral problems among Dutch nurses: A survey. Nursing Ethics, 6(6), 468-482.
31. Van der Kraan, W. G. M. (2001). Vraaggericht en vraaggestuurd: Een literatuuronderzoek naar vraaggerichtheid en vraagsturing in de gezondheidszorg [Demand-oriented and demand-driven. A review of the literature into demand-oriented and demand-driven care in the health-care sector]. The Hague, The Netherlands: ZONMw en Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
32. Van der Lyke, S., & Proot, I. (2004). Kwalitatief onderzoek: Over stromingen, kwaliteit en praktische relevantie [Qualitative research: Trends, quality and practical relevance]. In K. Cox, D. de Louw, J. Verhoef, & C. Kuiper (Eds.), Evidence-based practice voor verpleegkundigen (pp. 81-100). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
33. Van Rooij, E., Droyan Kodner, L., Rijsemus, T., & Schrijvers, G. (Eds.). (2002). Health and health care in the Netherlands. A critical self-assessment of Dutch experts in medical and health sciences (2nd rev. ed.). Maarssen, The Netherlands: Esevier Gezondheidszorg.
34. Vocational Organization for Nursing and Care, National Centre for Nursing and Care (NU'91/LCVV). (1998). Beroepscode voor de verpleging [Professional code for nursing practice]. Maarssen, The Netherlands: Elsevier gezondheidszorg.
35. Vulto, M. E. (2002). Welzijn en waardigheid voor langdurige zorggebruikers [Wellness and dignity for long-term users of health care]. Leiden, The Netherlands: Health Management Forum (STG).