Recognition of client values as a basis for tailored care: The view of Dutch expert patients and family caregivers

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 169-176

  Schoot, Tineke ^a,b,c   Proot, Ireen ^d   Ter Meulen, Ruud ^d   De Witte, Luc ^a,b,c,e  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b Business Unit Wellness and Health   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Physical Therapy   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Client perspective; Client centred care; Demand driven care; Expert patients; Grounded theory; Nurse client interaction; Recognition; Tailored care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATIENT CARE; RECOGNITION; SELF ESTEEM; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARD;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CAREGIVERS; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FAMILY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NETHERLANDS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PATIENTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 21844456926     PISSN: 02839318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00327.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Goudriaan G, Vaalburg AM. De vraag als maat (Using Demand as a Yardstick). 1998, Nederlandse Patienten/Consumentenfederatie (NP/CF) and Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn (NIZW), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
2. VWS Mv. Zicht op Zorg: Plan van Aanpak Modernisenng AWBZ (Care within Sight: Plan to Reform the General Law on Special Medical Expenses). 1999, Ministerie van VWS, The Hague, the Netherlands.
3. Cahill J. Patient participation: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 1998; 7: 119-28.
4. Watersworth S, Luker KA. Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care? J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 971-6.
5. Sainio C, Lauri S, Ericksson E. Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nurs Ethics 2001; 8: 97-113.
6. Latvala E. Developing and testing methods for improving patient-oriented mental health care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2002; 9: 41-47.
7. Donaldson LM. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. 2001, Department of Health, London, UK.
8. Rijckmans MJM, Garretsen HFI, Bongers IMB, van de Goor LAM. Vraaggerichtheid en vraagsturing. Een poging tot conceptuele verheldering (Demand-oriented and demand-driven care: an attempt at conceptual transparency). Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsz 2002; 80: 388-92.
9. van der Kraan WGM. Vraaggericht en Vraaggestuurd (Demand-oriented and Demand-driven). 2001, ZonMw, The Hague, the Netherlands.
10. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 1998, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
11. Ashbury JE. Overview of focus group research. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 414-20.
12. Webb C, Kevern J. Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 798-805.
13. Stevens PE. Focus groups: collecting aggregate data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nurs 1996; 12: 170-6.
14. Beachamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Agich GJ. Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age: An Ethical Framework for Long-term Care. 2003, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
16. Moody HR. Ethics in an Aging Society. 1992, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA/London, UK.
17. Proot IM, Crebolder HFJM, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Macor THGM, ter Meulen RHJ. Stroke patient's needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 41: 275-83.
18. Tronto JC. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. 1994, Routledge, New York, USA.
19. Tonkens B. Mondige burgers, getemde professionals: Marktwerking, vraagsturing en professionaliteit in de publieke sector (Empowered Citizens and Tamed Professionals: the Market, Demand-driven Care and Professionalism in the Public Sector). 2003, NIZW, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
20. Emmanuel J, Emmanuel L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2221-6.