Detecting group differences in sequential association using sampled permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 446-457

  Bakeman, Roger ^a   Mcarthur, Duncan ^a   Quera, Vicenç ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000844803     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200524     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ALLISON, P. D., & LIKER, J. K. (1982). Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 393-403.
2. BAKEMAN, R., & GOTTMAN, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. BAKEMAN, R., & QUERA, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 554-559.
4. BAKEMAN, R., & QUERA, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. BAKEMAN, R., & QUERA, V. (1995b). Log-linear approaches to lagsequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 272-284.
6. BAKEMAN, R., ROBINSON, B. F., & QUERA, V. (1996). Testing sequential association: Estimating exact p; values using sampled permutations. Psychological Methods, 1, 4-15.
7. BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. R., & HOLLAND, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. BRADLEY, J. V. (1968). Distribution-free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. BUDESCU, D. V. (1984). Tests of lagged dominance in sequential dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 402-414.
10. CAMILLI, G. (1990). The test of homogeneity for 2 × 2 contingency tables: A review of and some personal opinions on the controversy. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 135-145.
11. CASTELLAN, N. J., JR. (1979). The analysis of behavior sequences. In R. B. Cairns (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues, and illustrations (pp. 81-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. CASTELLAN, N. J., JR. (1992). Shuffling arrays: Appearances may be deceiving. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 72-77.
13. COHEN, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
14. COHEN, J., & COHEN, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. CONGER, A. J., & WARD, D. G. (1984). Agreement among 2 × 2 agreement indices. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 44, 301-314.
16. DUMAS, J. E. (1986). Controlling for autocorrelation in social interaction analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 125-127.
17. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1987). Randomization tests (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
18. FAGEN, R. M., & MANKOVICH, N. J. (1980). Two-act transitions, partitioned contingency tables, and the 'significant cells' problem. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1017-1023.
19. FARAONE, S. V., & DORFMAN, D. D. (1987). Lag sequential analysis: Robust statistical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 312-323.
20. GART, J. J., & ZWEIFEL, J. R. (1967). On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantile bioassay. Biometrika, 54, 181-187.
21. HAYS, W. L. (1963). Statistics (1st ed.). NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
22. IACOBUCCI, D., & WASSERMAN, S. (1988). A general framework for the statistical analysis of sequential dyadic interaction data. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 119-390.
23. LYNCH, J. C., LANDIS, J. R., & LOCALIO, A. R. (1991). StatXact. American Statistician, 45, 151-154.
24. MEHTA, C., & PATEL, N. (1992). StatXact: Statistical software for exact nonparametric inference. Cambridge, MA: Cytel Software Corporation.
25. MORLEY, D. D. (1987). Revised lag sequential analysis. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 172-182). Beverly Hills: Sage.
26. REYNOLDS, H. T. (1984). Analysis of nominal data. Beverly Hills: Sage.
27. TAVARÉ, S., & ALTHAM, P. M. E. (1983). Serial dependence of observations leading to contingency tables, and corrections to chisquared statistics. Biometrika, 70, 139-144.
28. WAMPOLD, B. E. (1989). Kappa as a measure of pattern in sequential data. Quality & Quantity, 23, 171-187.
29. WAMPOLD, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93-131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. WICKENS, T. D. (1993). Analysis of contingency tables with between subjects variability. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 191-204.