Model-based condition monitoring of PEM fuel cell using Hotelling T2 control limit

Journal of Power Sources

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 388-399

  Xue, X ^a   Tang, J ^a   Sammes, N ^a   Ding, Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition monitoring; Dynamic model; Measurement noise; PEM fuel cell; Statistical analysis; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; MEASUREMENT NOISE; PEM FUEL CELLS; UNCERTAINTY;

CONDITION MONITORING; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; POLYELECTROLYTES; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; STATISTICAL METHODS; VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT;

FUEL CELLS;

EID: 33749992572     PISSN: 03787753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Nguyen T.V., and White R.E. A water and heat management model for proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) 2178-2186
2. Springer T.E., Zawodzinski T.A., and Gottesfeld S. polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (1991) 2334-2342
3. Springer T.E., Wilson M.S., and Gottesfeld S. Modeling and experimental diagnostics in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) 3513-3526
4. Rodatz P., Buchi F., Onder C., and Guzzella L. Operational aspects of a large PEFC stack under practical conditions. J. Power Sources 128 (2004) 208-217
5. Voss H.H., Wilkinson D.P., Pickup P.G., Johnson M.C., and Basura V. Anode water removal: a water management and diagnostic technique for solid polymer fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 40 (1995) 321-328
6. Wood III D.L., Yi J.S., and Nguyen T.V. Effect of direct liquid water injection and interdigitated flow field on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998) 3795-3809
7. Nguyen T.V., and Knobbe M.W. A liquid water management strategy for PEM fuel cell stacks. J. Power Sources 114 (2003) 70-79
8. Schumacher J.O., Gemmar P., Denne M., Zedda M., and Stueber M. Control of miniature proton exchange membrane fuel cells based on fuzzy logic. J. Power Sources 129 (2004) 143-151
9. Hissel D., Pera M.C., and Kauffmann J.M. Diagnosis of automotive fuel cell power generators. J. Power Sources 128 (2004) 239-246
10. Seber G.A.F. Multivariate Observations (1984), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
11. 2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. J. Qual. Technol. 27 (1995) 99-108
12. Jin J., and Shi J. Automatic feature extraction of waveform signals for in-process diagnostic performance improvement. J. Intell. Manuf. 12 (2001) 257-268
13. Amphlett J.C., Mann R.F., Peppley B.A., Roberge P.R., and Rodrigues A. A model predicting transient response of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 61 (1996) 183-188
14. Xue X., and Tang J. PEM fuel cell dynamic model with phase change effect. ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2 (2005) 213-294
15. Um S., and Wang C.Y. Three-dimensional analysis of transport and electrochemical reactions in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 125 (2004) 40-51
16. Pukrushpan J.T., Peng H., and Stefanopoulou A.G. Control-oriented modeling and analysis for automotive fuel cell systems. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 126 (2004) 14-25
17. Liu H., Zhou T., and Cheng P. Transport phenomena analysis in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ASME J. Heat Transfer 127 (2005) 1363-1379
18. Wang Z.H., Wang C.Y., and Chen K.S. Two-phase flow and transport in the air cathode of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 90 (2001) 40-50
19. You L., and Liu H. A two-phase flow and transport model for the cathode of PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 2277-2287
20. Dutta S., Shimpalee S., and Van Zee J.W. Numerical predication of mass-exchange between cathode and anode channels in a PEM fuel cell. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 44 (2001) 2029-2042
21. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York
22. Bressanini D., and Morosi G. Robust wave function optimization procedures in quantum Monte Carlo methods. J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 5345-5350
23. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., and Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 (1979) 239-245
24. Pebesma E.J., and Heuvelink G.B.M. Latin hypercube sampling of Gaussian random fields. Technometrics 41 (1999) 303-312
25. Kalagnanam J., and Diwekar U. An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control. Technometrics 39 (1997) 308-319