The first cut is the deepest: Reflections on the state of animal dissection in biology education

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 583-600

  De Villiers, Rian ^a   Monk, Martin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Anatomy; Biology; Dissection; Laboratory animals; Laboratory procedures; Science instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749872165     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220270500041523     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Lord, T. R. (1990) The importance of animal dissection Journal of College Science Teaching, 19(6), pp. 330-331.
2. Bowd, A. D. (1993) Dissection as an instructional technique in secondary science: Choice and alternatives Society and Animals, 1(1), pp. 83-88.
3. Prentice, E. D. and Metcalf, W. K. and Quinn, T. H. and Sharp, J. G. and Jensen, R. H. and Holyoke, E. A. (1977) Stereoscopic anatomy: Evaluation of a new teaching system in human gross anatomy Journal of Medical Education, 52(9), pp. 758-763.
4. Quentin-Baxter, M. and Dewhurst, D. (1990) A computer-based atlas of a rat dissection Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation: A Notebook, 4, pp. 147-150.
5. Rowan, A. N. (1981) Perspectives: Animals in education The American Biology Teacher, 43(5), pp. 280-282.
6. Department of Education. (2002b) National Curriculum Statement Grades 10-12 (Schools) Life Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Education. Available online at: Http://education.pwv.gov.za/content/documents/ 110.pdf, visited 14 July 2004
7. Mccollum, T. L.(1988). The effect of animal dissections on student acquisition of knowledge of and attitudes toward the animals dissected. In [pp.]. ERIC ED 294 749
8. (1998) Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. In. London: School of Education, King's College, University of London. Available online at: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/publications/bey2000.pdf, visited 13 July 2004
9. Dewhurst, D. G. and Hardcastle, J. and Hardcastle, P. T. and Stuart, E. (1994) Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption Advances in Physiology Education, 267(6), pp. 95-104.
10. Diamond, M. C. and Scheibel, A. B. and Elson, L. M. (1985) The Human Brain Coloring Book. New York: HarperPerennial.
11. Greenfield, C. L. and Johnson, A. L. and Shaeffer, D. J. and Hungerford, L. L. (1995) Comparison of surgical skills of students trained using models or live animals Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 206(12), pp. 1840-1845.
12. Guerrini, A.(2003) Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Hodson, D. (2003) Time for action: Science education for an alternative future International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp. 645-670.
14. Kinzie, M. B. and Larsen, V. A. and Burch, J. B. and Boker, S. M. (1996) Frog dissection via the world-wide web: Implications for widespread delivery of instruction Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), pp. 59-69.
15. Kinzie, M. B. and Strauss, R. and Foss, J. (1993) The effects of an interactive dissection simulation on the performance and achievement of high school biology students Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), pp. 989-1000.
16. Kline, A. D. (1995) We should allow dissection of animals Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics;, 8(2), pp. 190-197.
17. Kohlberg, L. and Mayer, R. (1972) Development as the aim of education Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), pp. 449-496.
18. Langley, G. R. (1991) Animals in science education-ethics and alternatives Journal of Biological Education, 25(4), pp. 274-279.
19. Doster, E. C. and Jackson, D. F. and Oliver, J. S. and Crockett, D. K. and Emory, A. L. (1997) Values, dissection, and school science: An inquiry into students' construction of meaning. Available online at: http://www.ed.psu.edu/ci/Journals/97pap7.htm, visited 15 January 2003
20. Downie, R. and Meadows, J. (1995) Experience with a dissection opt-out scheme in university level biology Journal of Biological Education, 29(3), pp. 187-194.
21. Fowler, H. S. and Brosius, E. J. (1968) A research study on the values gained from dissection of animals in secondary school biology Science Education, 52(1), pp. 55-57.
22. Strauss, R. T. and Kinzie, M. B. (1991) High-tech alternatives to dissection The American Biology Teacher, 53(3), pp. 154-158.
23. Smith, W. (1990) Dissection and use of animals in schools The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(4), pp. 46-49.
24. Balcombe, J. (1997) Student/teacher conflict regarding animal dissection The American Biology Teacher, 59(1), pp. 22-25.
25. Nichols, J. R. (1995) Values & biology education The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), pp. 268-271.
26. Stanisstreet, M. and Spofforth, N. and Williams, T. (1993) Attitudes of children to the uses of animals International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), pp. 411-425.
27. Department of Education. (2002a) Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R-9 (Schools) Policy, Natural Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Education. Available online at: Http://education.pwv.gov.za/content/ documents/12.pdf, visited 14 July 2004
28. Welser, J. R. (1969) An evaluative investigation of silent loop films in the teaching of anatomy: Final report. In. Lafayette IN: Purdue University. ERIC ED 029 796
29. Wheeler, A. G. (1993) Justifying the dissection of animals in biology teaching The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(3), pp. 30-35.
30. Leonard, W. H. (1985). Biology instruction by interactive video-disc or conventional laboratory: A qualitative comparison. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching In [pp.]. ERIC ED 258 811
31. Leonard, W. H. (1989) A comparison of student reactions to biology instruction by interactive video-disc or conventional laboratory Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), pp. 95-104.
32. Orlans, F. B. (1988a) Debating dissection The Science Teacher, 55(8), pp. 36-40.
33. (1998) Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now?. London: Routledge.
34. Allchin, D. (1991) Dissecting classroom ethics The Science Teacher, 58(1), pp. 44-49.
35. Offner, S. (1993) The importance of dissection in biology teaching The American Biology Teacher, 55(3), pp. 147-149.
36. Lord, T. R. and Moses, R. (1994) College students' opinions about animal dissections Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), pp. 267-270.
37. Lock, R. (1993) Bovine eyeball dissection in schools and colleges Journal of Biological Education, 27(3), pp. 157.
38. Burkett, R. S. (2000) To dissect or not to dissect. Available online at:, visited 27 December 2004
39. Clarke, K. A. (1987) The use of microcomputer simulations in undergraduate neurophysiology experiments Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 14(3), pp. 134-140.
40. Davis, P. (1997) Dissection symposium: A meeting of minds? National Anti-vivisection Society Bulletin (Winter edition), pp. 22-29.
41. Yelverton, B. (1991) Reverse dissection The Science Teacher, 58(6), pp. 72-74.
42. Aikenhead, G. S.(1990) Scientific/technological literacy, critical reasoning, and classroom practice. In Foundations of Literacy Policy in Canada. (pp. 127-145). Calgary AB: Detselig.
43. Gilmore, D. R. (1991) Politics and prejudice: Dissection in biology education, Part 2 The American Biology Teacher, 53(5), pp. 272-274.
44. Kieffer, G. H. (1979) Can bioethics be taught? The American Biology Teacher, 41(3), pp. 176-180.
45. Miller, J. and Pelham, D.(1984) The Facts of Life: A Three-Dimensional Study. London: Jonathan Cape.
46. Jones, N. A. and Olafson, R. P. and Sutin, J. (1978) Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection Journal of Medical Education, 53(3), pp. 198-205.
47. Keiser, T. D. and Hamm, R. W. (1991) Dissection: The case for The Science Teacher, 58(1), pp. 13.
48. (1993) Biology Education and Animals: Opportunities and Issues: Summary Proceedings. North Grafton MA: Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University.
49. Sieber, J. E. (1986) Students' and scientists' attitudes on animal research The American Biology Teacher, 48(2), pp. 85-91.
50. Orlans, F. B. (1988b) Should students harm or destroy animal life? The American Biology Teacher, 50(1), pp. 6-12.
51. Orlans, F. B. (1991) Dissection: The case against The Science Teacher, 58(1), pp. 12.
52. Millett, K. and Lock, R. (1992) GCSE students' attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teachers Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), pp. 204-208.
53. Learning and Teaching (2004) Resources: Learning and Teaching Support Network subject centre for Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine, School of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Available online at:, visited 26 June 2004